Main Article Content
Abstract
If the authenticity of a hadith is uncertain and contradicts reason, then the hadith is considered weak. However, if a hadith is considered authentic by hadith scholars, two different theories emerge among the scholars. The first theory argues that true hadith never contradict reason. According to this view, common sense and clarity will never conflict with authentic hadith. On the other hand, the second theory argues that the Prophet's hadith are considered weak if they conflict with reason. This research uses analytical and library research methods, which utilize various scientific works including books, articles and writings by Muslim scholars. The findings of this research show that when a hadith, which is narrated through a strong chain of narrators and its sanad goes back to the Prophet, cannot contradict reason. However, if a hadith goes against common sense, then that can be a valid reason to question its authenticity and consider it weak. Through comprehensive scientific discourse analysis, this research provides a deeper understanding of the complex relationship between hadith and reason and how Islam values reason. This underscores the importance of a rigorous authentication process, emphasizing the need to consider the reliability of hadith sanads and principles of intellectual reasoning when assessing the strength or weakness of a Prophetic hadith
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Idris Siregar, & Alwi Padly Harahap. (2024). The Relevance of Hadith and Reason in Demonstrating The Status of Hadith. Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 7(1), 16-33. https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v7i1.8237
References
- AbÅ« al-Ḥusain Muslim bin al-ḤajjÄj al-QusyairÄ« al-NaisÄbÅ«rÄ«. á¹¢aḥīḥ Muslim. Edited by Muḥammad Fu’Äd ‘Abd al-BÄqÄ«. Vol. 2. Kairo: Maá¹ba’ah ‘ĪsÄ al-BÄbÄ« al-ḤalabÄ«, 1955.
- Al-‘AsqalÄnÄ«, AbÅ« al-Faá¸l Aḥmad bin ‘AlÄ« bin Muḥammad bin Aḥmad bin Ḥajar. Nukhbah Al-Fikr. Kairo: DÄr al-Ḥadīṡ, 1997.
- Al-Aḥdab, KhladÅ«n Muḥammad Sulaim. Aṡar ‘Ilm Uṣūl Al-Ḥadīṡ FÄ« TasykÄ«l Al-‘Aql Al-Muslim. Damaskus: DÄr al-MinhÄj al-QawÄ«m, 2021.
- Al-BaihaqÄ«, Aḥmad bin al-Ḥusain bin ‘AlÄ« bin MÅ«sa al-KhusraujirdÄ« al-KharÄsÄnÄ« AbÅ« Bakr. Al-Sunan Al-á¹¢agÄ«r Li Al-BaihaqÄ«. Vol. 2. Fakistan: JÄmi’ah al-DirÄsÄt al-IslÄmiyah, 1989.
- Al-BukhÄrÄ«, AbÅ« ‘AbdillÄh Muḥammad bin IsmÄ’īl. á¹¢aḥīḥ Al-BukhÄrÄ«. Vol. 6. Damaskus: DÄr Ibnu Kaṡīr, 1993.
- Al-DausarÄ«, Muḥammad bin Aḥmad. “AsÄlÄ«b Al-ḤadiṡiyÄ«n FÄ« Al-Ṭa’n FÄ« Al-Sunnah Al-Nabawiyyah,†2022.
- Al-Jauziyah, AbÅ« ‘AbdillÄh Muḥammad bin AbÅ« Bakr bin AyyÅ«b Ibnu Qayyim. Al-á¹¢awÄ’iq Al-Mursalah ‘AlÄ Al-Jahmiyah Wa Al-Mu’Ṭalah. Vol. 2. BeirÅ«t: DÄr Ibnu Ḥazm, 2020.
- Al-SibÄ’ī, Muá¹£á¹afÄ. Sunnah Dan Peranannya Dalam Penetapan Hukum Islam, Terj. Nurcholis Madjid. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 1993.
- Al-SijistÄnÄ«, AbÅ« DÄwud SulaimÄn bin al-Asy’aṡ bin IsḥÄq bin BasyÄ«r bin SyaddÄd bin ‘Amr al-AzdÄ«. Sunan AbÅ« DÄwud. Vol. 3. BeirÅ«t: al-Maktabah al-Iá¹£riyah, n.d.
- Al-SyarÄ«f, Aḥmad & AḥlÄm Muá¹alqah. “Al-‘AlÄqah Bayn Al-‘Aql Wa Al-Wahy Wa An’Akasatuha Al-Fikriyah Wa Al-Tarbawiyah.†Majallat Al-Manarah Lil-Buhuth Wal-Dirasat 20, no. 1 (2013): 241–63.
- Al-ṬaḥḥÄn, MaḥmÅ«d. Metode TakhrÄ«j Al-Ḥadith Dan Penelitian Sanad Hadis, Terj. HM. Ridlwan Nasir. Surabaya: IMTIYAZ, 2015.
- Al-ṬayÄlisÄ«, AbÅ« DÄwud. Musnad AbÄ« DÄwud Al-ṬayÄlisÄ«. Vol. 4. Mesir: DÄr al-Ḥijr, 1999.
- Al-Tirmiżī, Muḥammad bin ‘Īsa bin SÅ«rah MÅ«sa bin al-ḌaḥḥÄk AbÅ« ‘Īsa. Sunan Al-Tirmiżī. Mesir: Muá¹£á¹afÄ al-BÄbÄ« al-ḤalabÄ«, 1975.
- Arifin, Zainul. “Al-Ghazali’s Thought of Islamic Education And It’s Relevance with the Modern Education.†Khalifa: Journal of Islamic Education 2, no. 1 (2018): 1.
- Azhari, Raihanah HJ. Mohamad Salfiyudin Mohd Pandi, Asmak AB Rahman. “Wealth Planning Parameters Based on Maqaṣid Al-Shariʻah According to Ibn ʻAshur’s View: A Preliminary Study.†International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies 7, no. 1 (2021): 31–46.
- BarakÄt, RasyÄ«d. “ḤattÄ Al-ImÄm Ibnu Taimiyyah Yuqaddimu Al-‘Aql ‘alÄ Al-Naql,†2018.
- Cros, Karim Douglas. “The Intellect in Islamic Thought : Mind and Heart.†The Official Journal of the Centre for Civilisational Dialogue 2, no. 1 (2006): 1–16.
- Fadl, Khaled Abou El. “The Epistemology of the Truth in Modern Islam.†Philosophy & Social Criticism 41, no. 4–5 (2015): 473–86.
- Farida, Ummu. “Muḥammad Naṣr Al-Din Al-Albani and His Method of Correcting and Weakening the Hadith: A Critical Reading.†Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis 21, no. 2 (2020): 411.
- Floridi, Luciano. Josh Cowls, Monica Baltrametti, Raja Chatila, Patrice Chazerand, Virginia Dignum, Chirstoph Luetge, Robert Madelin, Ugo Pagallo, Francesca Rossi, Burkhard Schafer, Peggy Valcke & Effy Vayena. “An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations.†Ethics, Governance, and Policies in Artificial Intelligence 144 (2021): 19–39.
- Gonibala, Rosalinda. “Manajemen Akal Dan Orientasi Studi Al-Quran Dan Al-Hadits.†Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam 3, no. 2 (2019): 283–94.
- Haltinner, Kristin & Dilshani Sarathchandra. “The Nature and Nuance of Climate Change Skepticism in the United States.†Rural Sociology 86, no. 4 (2021): 673–702.
- Huda, Khoirul. Ilmu Matan Hadis. Ciputat: Yayasan Pengkajian Hadits el-Bukhari, 2019.
- Ismail, M. Syuhudi. Kaidah Kesahihan Sanad Hadis: Telaah Kritis Dan Tinjauan Dengan Pendekatan Ilmu Sejarah. Jakarta: PT Bulan Bintang, 2014.
- ———. Metodologi Penelitian Hadis Nabi. Jakarta: PT Bulan Bintang, 2007.
- Jafari, Aliakbar. “Islamic Marketing: Insights from a Critical Perspective.†Journal of Islamic Marketing 3, no. 1 (2022): 22–34.
- Karagözoǧlu, Mustafa Macit. “Contested Avenues in Post-Classical Sunni Hadīth Criticism: A Reading through the Lens of Al-Mughni ’an Al-Hifz Wal-Kitab.†Journal of Islamic Studies 29, no. 1 (2018): 149–80.
- KhaldÅ«n, ‘AbdurraḥmÄn bin Ibnu. TÄrÄ«kh Ibnu KhaldÅ«n. Vol. 1. BeirÅ«t: DÄr al-Fikr, 1981.
- Mufliḥ, SyamsuddÄ«n Ibnu. Al-AdÄb Al-Syar’iyyah. Madinah: DÄr al-IrsyÄd, 2007.
- Padela, Aasim I. & Omar Qureshi. “Islamic Perspectives on Clinical Intervention Near the End of Life: We Can but Must We? .†Death and Dying: An Exercise in Comparative Philosophy of Religion, 2019, 201–25.
- Qodratullah, Waway. “Konsep Ulul Albab Dalam Al Quran Dan Implikasinya Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Di Perguruan Tinggi.†Jurnal Difusi 8, no. 1 (2016): 17–24.
- Rizapoor, Habiburrahman. Aminullah Poya & Zaifullah Athari. “The Relationship Between Prophetic Hadith and Intellect: A Critical Examination of the Scholarly Discourse.†International Journal of Islamic Studies Higher Education 2, no. 2 (2023): 134–51.
- Rizapoor, Habiburrahman & Mohammad Anwar Zafari. “A Critical Analysis Of The Existence Of Da’if Ḥadith (Weak Ḥadith) Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhari.†Jurnal Ushuluddin 29, no. 1 (2021): 1–17.
- Rozak, Abdul & Rosihon Anwar. Ilmu Kalam. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia, 2016.
- RuwÄn, ‘AzaddÄ«n. “Majal Al-‘Aql Fi Al-Naqd Al-Hadithi ‘Ind Al-Muhaddithin.†Majallat Al-BuhÅ«á¹ Al-‘Ilmiyyah Wa Al-DirÄsat Al-IslÄmiyyah 14, no. 5 (2022): 11–44.
- Saeed, Abdeljabbar. “The Role of Reason in Dealing with the Prophetic Sunna in Relation to the Chain of Narrators, Text and Indication.†AlBayan 18, no. 1 (2020): 74–106.
- Soetari, Endang. Ilmu Hadis: Kajian RiwÄyah & DirÄyah. Bandung: CV. Mimbar Pustaka, 2018.
- Syaiful, Muhammad. “Pemahaman Hadis Mengenai Anjuran Membunuh Cicak.†IKLILA: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial 5, no. 1 (2022): 68–92.
- Taimiyyah, TaqÄ« al-DÄ«n AbÅ« al-‘AbbÄs Aḥmad bin ‘Abd al-ḤalÄ«m bin ‘Abd al-SalÄm bin ‘AbdullÄh bin AbÄ« al-QÄsim bin Muḥammad Ibnu. Dar’ Ta’ÄruḠAl-‘Aql Wa Al-Naql. Vol. 1. Saudi Arabia: al-Mumlikah al-‘Arabiyyah al-Su’ūdiyyah, 1991.
- Yaqub, Ali Mustafa. Cara Benar Memahami Hadis. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2020.