THE TEACHERS’ TECHNIQUES IN PROVIDING CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON STUDENTS’ PRONUNCIATION ERROR

  • Khairil Razali Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry
  • Nurul Husna Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Abstract

This research aimed to analyse the teachers’ implementation of corrective feedback and to identify the types of corrective feedback provided by teachers on students’ pronunciation errors in the classroom. The writer conducted the research at MAS Darul Ulum Banda Aceh. The participants of the research were 1st and 2nd year teachers. The data was collected by doing observations in X and XII classes. The writer found that each of both teachers only used 3 kinds of corrective feedback. The first teacher used recast and  metalinguistic while the second teacher used elicitation and clarification request. However, both  teachers shared  the type of explicit feedback. There are 6 types of corrective feedback proposed by Lyster and Ranta (1997): recast, metalinguistic, clarification request, elicitation, explicit and repetition. The use of each types was different in percentage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
Dec 31, 2018
How to Cite
RAZALI, Khairil; HUSNA, Nurul. THE TEACHERS’ TECHNIQUES IN PROVIDING CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON STUDENTS’ PRONUNCIATION ERROR. JL3T ( Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching), [S.l.], v. 4, n. 2, p. 1-16, dec. 2018. ISSN 2580-2348. Available at: <http://journal.iainlangsa.ac.id/index.php/jl3t/article/view/752>. Date accessed: 18 mar. 2019.
Abstract viewed = 0 times
pdf downloaded = 0 times