Article Sidebar

Submitted
Aug 28, 2025
Published
Oct 23, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 21 Download : 17

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Ideally, the methodology of philosophical research serves as a foundation for rational and critical thinking in unraveling life’s problems; however, in reality, philosophy is often regarded as abstract and distant from actual issues. This study aims to affirm the role of philosophical methodology as a conceptual instrument in understanding and providing direction for contemporary problems. The methodology employed is library research with an analytical-critical qualitative approach, utilizing primary sources from classical and modern philosophical works, as well as secondary sources from recent academic studies. The findings indicate that the methodology of philosophical research, through systematic steps such as concept clarification, argument analysis, and critical reflection, can make a tangible contribution in bridging the gap between the ideality of philosophy and social reality, while also offering conceptual solutions relevant to contemporary dynamics.

Keywords

Philosophical Methodology Qualitative Research Contemporary Issues Critical Analysis

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with JUIP: Journal of Ushuluddin and Islamic Philosophy  agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC 4.0, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the authors' work non-commercially, and although the others' new works must also acknowledge the authors and be non-commercial, they do not have to license their derivative works on the same terms.
  2. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). In other words, authors can archive pre-print (submitted version),  post-print (accepted version), and publisher's version/PDF.

References

  1. Afriandi, B., Bumi, H. R., Kamal, T., Hakim, R., Hanafi, H., & Julhadi, J. (2024). Objek-objek kajian filsafat ilmu (ontologi, epistemologi, aksiologi) dan urgensinya dalam kajian keislaman. Jurnal Kajian dan Pengembangan Umat, 7(1), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.31869/jkpu.v7i1.5524
  2. Annur, A. Shifa, & Rijal, S. (2025). Dimensi-dimensi aksiologis dan implementasinya dalam pendidikan Islam. Ameena Journal, 3(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.63732/aij.v3i2.166
  3. Anwar, K. (2013). Sejarah dan perkembangan filsafat ilmu. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v7no2.138
  4. Dongoran, R., Hasibuan, A. R., Sibuea, N. M., Pratama, M. F., & Raihan, M. (2024a). Kontribusi filsafat ilmu dalam penelitian ilmiah dan kehidupan sosial. Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia, 1(3), 332–349. https://doi.org/10.62383/amandemen.v1i3.414
  5. Dongoran, R., Hasibuan, A. R., Sibuea, N. M., Pratama, M. F., & Raihan, M. (2024b). Kontribusi filsafat ilmu dalam penelitian ilmiah dan kehidupan sosial. Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia, 1(3), 332–349. https://doi.org/10.62383/amandemen.v1i3.414
  6. Hadi, P. H. (2007). Kebenaran dan metodologi penelitian filsafat: Sebuah tinjauan epistemologis. Jurnal Filsafat, 1(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.31480
  7. Hapidin, A., Natsir, N. F., & Haryanti, E. (2022). Epistemologi pendidikan Islam di Indonesia sebagai solusi menjawab tantangan ilmu pengetahuan dan metode ilmiah di era 4.0. Tarbawiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 6(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.32332/tarbawiyah.v6i1.4387
  8. Haris, M. H., & Mariani, R. (2024). Perbedaan pengetahuan ilmu, filsafat, dan agama. Pendis: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 3(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.61721/pendis.v3i1.82
  9. Maulida, R. S., Fauziah, S. S., Muiz, R. N., Fauzi, A., & Hidayat, W. (2024). Metode penelitian ilmiah berbasis filsafat ilmu. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 9(3), 296–304. https://doi.org/10.34125/jmp.v9i3.349
  10. Milasari, M., Syukri, A., Badarussyamsi, B., & Rizki, A. F. (2021). Filsafat ilmu dan pengembangan metode ilmiah. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 4(3), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v4i3.35499
  11. Nisa, K., Yusuf, A., Zulfa, I. D., & Mozamb, G. Z. A. (2023). Implikasi filsafat pendidikan aliran idealisme pada pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Transformasi Humaniora, 6(12). https://humaniora.ojs.co.id/index.php/jth/article/view/33
  12. Rahardja, U. (2022). Masalah etis dalam penerapan sistem kecerdasan buatan. Technomedia Journal, 7(2), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.33050/tmj.v7i2.1895
  13. Ranubaya, F. A. (2023). Refleksi kritis terhadap artificial intelligence sebagai teknologi baru yang manusiawi menurut dokumen Rome Call for AI Ethics. Akademika: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 23(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.31385/jakad.v23i1.7
  14. Sholahudin, U. (2020). Membedah teori kritis mazhab Frankfurt: Sejarah, asumsi, dan kontribusinya terhadap perkembangan teori ilmu sosial. Journal of Urban Sociology, 3(2), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.30742/jus.v3i2.1246
  15. Subekti, I., Syukri, A., Badarussyamsi, B., & Rizki, A. F. (2021). Kontribusi filsafat ilmu dalam penelitian ilmiah dan kehidupan sosial. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 4(3), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v4i3.37304
  16. Yuanatz, N. R. (2024). Analisis filsafat dalam proses berpikir manusia: Peran berpikir kritis dalam kehidupan. Antropocene: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Humaniora, 4(2), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.56393/antropocene.v4i2.2442