Article Sidebar

Submitted
Dec 13, 2025
Accepted
Dec 31, 2025
Published
Dec 31, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 32 Download : 3

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of smart contracts in digital business practices and to assess their legal certainty from a civil law perspective. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches, focusing on the Indonesian Civil Code, the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions, and the Law on Financial Sector Development and Strengthening. The findings indicate that smart contracts can be legally recognized as valid agreements provided they fulfill the essential requirements of contract validity, namely consent, legal capacity, a specific object, and a lawful cause. However, the automated and code-based nature of smart contracts poses challenges in interpreting the parties’ intent, verifying legal capacity, and determining lawful cause. Therefore, stronger regulatory frameworks and hybrid contract models are necessary to ensure legal certainty for smart contracts in Indonesia.

Keywords

Smart Contract Digital Business Civil Law

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Masrofah, M., Suroso, T., & Wardani, S. (2025). Implementasi Smart Contract dalam Bisnis Digital Berdasarkan Hukum Perdata. Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 10(2), 208-226. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v10i2.13370

References

  1. Azmi, M. U., & Azwar, T. K. D. (2023). Risiko hukum penggunaan smart contract pada Ethereum di Indonesia. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 2(3), 176–188.
  2. Corrales, M., Fenwick, M., & Haapio, H. (2019). Legal tech, smart contracts and blockchain. Springer.
  3. Fahlevi, F. S., & Fitriana, Z. M. (2024). Keabsahan smart contract sebagai solusi praktik manipulasi kontrak di Indonesia. Journal of Social Community, 9(2), 112–125.
  4. Hayatuddin, K., & Rani, F. (2019). Efforts to realize a sustainable city of Palembang by implementing ideal green open space regulations and constraints. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 317, 245–250.
  5. Hayatuddin, K., & Rani, F. H. (2022). The legal effort of e-commerce fraud’s victim according to the Indonesian consumer protection law. Proceedings of the International Conference on Public Organization, 209, 312–318.
  6. Hidayatul, D., et al. (2020). Aplikasi smart contract dalam e-commerce perspektif hukum perjanjian syariah. Jurnal Qolamuna, 6(1), 45–60.
  7. Khan, N., Loukil, F., Ghedira-Guegan, C., Benkhelifa, E., & Bani-Hani, A. (2021). Blockchain smart contracts: Applications, challenges, and future trends. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 14(5), 2903–2925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-021-01127-0
  8. Komariah. (2002). Hukum perdata. Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.
  9. Oktaviani, S. (2021). Implementasi smart contract pada teknologi blockchain dalam kaitannya dengan notaris sebagai pejabat umum. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 9(11), 2154–2166.
  10. Rahman, I., Sudarmanto, H. L., & Widayati, S. C. (2020). Kajian yuridis jaminan kebendaan pada digital aset sebagai objek jaminan. Jurnal Transparansi Hukum, 3(2), 135–149.
  11. Roring, E. B. (2024). Analisis implementasi kontrak pintar sebagai inovasi hukum dalam kerangka hukum positif. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 1–14.
  12. Sinaga, N. A. (2018). Peranan asas-asas hukum perjanjian mewujudkan tujuan perjanjian. Binamulia Hukum, 2(2), 123–135.
  13. Tulsidas, T. U. (2018). Smart contracts from a legal perspective (Master’s thesis). Universitat d’Alacant.
  14. Widyastuti, I. D. (2021). Smart contract dan tantangannya dalam perspektif hukum perdata Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De Jure, 21(1), 85–98.