Article Sidebar

Submitted
Dec 14, 2025
Accepted
Dec 26, 2025
Published
Dec 31, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 22 Download : 8

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to examine the juridical application of Article 49 KUHP through an analysis of Decision Number 115/Pid.B/2021/PN Stb, with particular attention to the judicial assessment of the elements of self-defense. This research employs normative legal research (doctrinal legal research) using a qualitative approach, supported by the statute approach, case approach, and conceptual approach. The primary legal materials consist of statutory regulations and court decisions, while secondary materials include legal doctrines and scholarly publications in criminal law. The findings reveal that the court’s legal reasoning has not fully accommodated the principles of proportionality and contextual interpretation, resulting in an emphasis on formal legal requirements rather than the protective function of self-defense as a justification ground (rechtvaardigingsgrond). This study concludes that a more contextual and proportional interpretation of Article 49 KUHP is necessary to ensure legal certainty, justice, and legal utility in the application of self-defense provisions.

Keywords

Noodweer Self-Defense Judicial Reasoning

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Ulyatin Zumaroh, S. N., & Rusdiana, E. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Pasal 49 KUHP terkait Pembelaan Terpaksa dalam Studi Putusan Nomor 115/Pid.B/2021/PN Stb. Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 10(2), 106-124. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v10i2.13401

References

  1. Alfathan, M. Hafidz Faqih, Mirza Taufiqurrahman, and Azi Fernando Putra. “Analisis Hukum Unsur Pembelaan Terpaksa Atau Membela Diri Dalam Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Akademik 2, no. 3 (2025): 118–30. https://doi.org/10.61722/jmia.v2i3.4562.
  2. Bahri, Saiful. “Problema Dan Solusi Peradilan Pidana Yang Berkeadilan Dalam Perkara Pembelaan Terpaksa.” Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika 5, no. 1 (2021): 131–47. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v5i1.415.
  3. Fadhilah, Anintya Putri. “Analisi Kasus Pembelaan Terpaksa oleh Amaq Sinta Sebagai Alasan Pembenar (Noodware).” Recidive: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan 14, no. 2 (2025): 155–64. https://doi.org/10.20961/recidive.v14i2.98960.
  4. Fadhlullah, Rouf, Diah Gustiniati Maulani, Dona Raisa Monica, and Eko Raharjo. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Perlindungan Hukum Korban Yang Melakukan Pembelaan Terpaksa.” Journal of Contemporary Law Studies 2, no. 3 (2025): 261–74. https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i3.4011.
  5. Himim, Aldora Ananda Putra, Deny Guntara, and Muhamad Abas. “Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan (Studi Putusan Nomor: 311/Pid.B/2022/Pn. Kwg.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik 6, no. 1 (2025): 502–10. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v6i1.6234.
  6. Idayu, Maria, and Itok Dwi Kurniawan. “Pertimbangan Hakim atas Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan yang Menyebabkan Kematian dalam Keadaan Noodweer Exces.” Verstek 12, no. 1 (2024): 167–76. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v12i1.80691.
  7. Jap, Clayment Claudio, and R. Rahaditya. “Implementasi Pembelaan Terpaksa (Noodweer) Sebagai Alasan Penghapus Pidana Dalam Kasus Penganiayaan.” Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development 7, no. 1 (2024): 657–66. https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v7i1.1301.
  8. Kusuma, Ni Putu Kristin Ningtyas, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi, and I. Made Minggu Widyantara. “Pembelaan Terpaksa (Noodweer) Sebagai Penghapus Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Yang Menyebabkan Kematian (Studi Putusan Perkara Pidana Nomor 115/Pid.B/2021/PN Stb).” Jurnal Analogi Hukum 5, no. 1 (2023): 21–27. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.5.1.2023.21-27.
  9. Labibah, Balqis Salma. “Analisis Yuridis Pembelaan Terpaksa Yang Melampaui Batas (Noodweer Exces) Pada Pasal 49 Ayat (2) KUHP Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan (Putusan Nomor 33/Pid.B/2024/PN Bir).” Indonesian Journal of Contemporary Law 1, no. 04 (2024). https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/ijcl/article/view/43663.
  10. Lakoy, Revani Engeli Kania. “Syarat Proporsionalitas Dan Subsidiaritas Dalam Pembelaan Terpaksa Menurut Pasal 49 Ayat (1) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.” Lex Crimen 9, no. 2 (2020). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/28551.
  11. Malasai, Landi. “Asas Culpa in Causa (Penyebab Kesalahan) Sebagai Pengecualian Terhadap Pembelaan Terpaksa Menurut Pasal 49 Ayat (1) KUHP.” Lex Crimen 8, no. 8 (2019). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/26797.
  12. Prochorus, Louisa Audyna, and Arman Tjoneng. “Penerapan Pasal 49 KUHP Terkait Dengan Pembelaan Terpaksa Dalam Kasus Kejahatan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik 5, no. 4 (2025): 3287–99. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i4.4450.
  13. Raras, Niwang Pambayun Purbo, Bambang Sugiri, and Alfons Zakaria. “Pembelaan Terpaksa (Noodweer) Bukan Sebagai Dasar Penghentian Penyidikan.” RechtJiva, March 4, 2024, 149–66. https://doi.org/10.21776/rechtjiva.v1n1.9.
  14. Saputra, Ekky, Maryano Maryano, and Hedwig Adianto Mau. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Noodweer Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan.” Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge 4, no. 10 (2025): 7493–504. https://doi.org/10.53625/jirk.v4i10.9856.
  15. Sidik, Zulfikri, Arif Dian Santoso Dian Santoso, and Diah Widhi Annisa. “Tinjauan Fiqh Jinayat dan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pembelaan Terpaksa yang Melampaui Batas dalam Tindak Kejahatan.” Journal of Indonesian Comparative of Syari’ah Law 3, no. 2 (2020): 207–18. https://doi.org/10.21111/jicl.v3i2.5386.
  16. Sonia, Shoifatus. “Analisis Pembelaan Terpaksa Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak (Berdasarkan Putusan Nomor: 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN Kpn).” Journal of Law and Administrative Science 3, no. 2 (2025): 15–29. https://doi.org/10.33478/jlas.v3i2.41.
  17. Wafi, Auzan, and Hery Firmansyah. “Self-Defense in Criminal Law: Examining Limitations and Implications for Criminal Liability.” Jurnal USM Law Review 8, no. 2 (2025): 787–96. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i2.12072.
  18. Yusuf, Ines Adania. “Analysis of Excessive Self-Defense (Noodweerexces) in the Crime of Persecution.” Indonesian Research Journal in Legal Studies 4, no. 1 (2025): 9–20. https://doi.org/10.31934/irjils.v4i1.8620.