Article Sidebar

Submitted
Dec 19, 2025
Accepted
Jan 8, 2026
Published
Jan 10, 2026
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 33 Download : 14

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the position, probative value, and relevance of testimonium de auditu within the framework of Islamic criminal law, while also examining it in comparison with positive criminal law. This research employs a qualitative library-based methodology using a normative juridical approach, enriched by conceptual and comparative approaches. Data are analyzed through content analysis and critical discourse analysis of fiqh jinayah literature, usul al-fiqh, and contemporary scholarly works. The findings indicate that testimonium de auditu does not possess the authority of a primary evidentiary instrument in Islamic criminal law; nevertheless, it may be conditionally accepted as supporting information through the concepts of istifadah and maslahah. These findings underscore the normative flexibility of Islamic criminal law in responding to the complexities of modern evidentiary practices while maintaining principles of prudence and substantive justice.

Keywords

Testimonium de Auditu Shahadah Criminal Evidence

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Sihab Siregar, A., & Lubis, Z. (2026). Kesaksian Testimonium de Auditu dalam Kajian Hukum Pidana Islam. Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 11(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v11i1.13519

References

  1. Afrini, Irfa, Yuli Safarin, and Raihana Fadhila. “Internalisasi Nilai Kerahmatan dalam Surat Al-Anbiya Ayat 107 pada Pendidikan Berbasis Komunitas.” Al Kareem Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir 1, no. 2 (2024): 89–106.
  2. Agusta, M. Amry, and Nanda Sahputra Umara. “Konstruksi Pembuktian Keterangan Saksi Testimonium de Auditu sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Analisis Putusan Nomor 93/Pid.B/2013/PN.TK).” Al-Qisth Law Review 6, no. 1 (2022): 130–155.
  3. Arafat, Muhammad, and Asmuni. “Implementation of Maqashid Al-Syariah in Islamic Criminal Law in Muslim Countries: A Comparative Study in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Malaysia, and Indonesia.” Al-Sulthaniyah 14, no. 1 (2025): 45–68. https://doi.org/10.37567/al-sulthaniyah.v14i1.3577.
  4. Asmuni, Asmuni. “Testimonium de Auditu: Telaah Perspektif Hukum Acara Perdata dan Fiqh.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 3, no. 2 (2014): 191–202.
  5. Bustamam, Amrullah. “Repudiation of Witness of Testimonium de Auditu as Evidence in the Verdict of the Aceh Sharia Court Number 7/JN/2021/MS Aceh [Penolakan Saksi Testimonium de Auditu sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Putusan Mahkamah Syariah Aceh Nomor 7/JN/2021/MS Aceh].” Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum 10, no. 1 (2021): 85–108. https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v10i1.10519.
  6. Darojat, Muhammad Ardian Imam. Kekuatan Saksi Testimonium de Auditu dalam Perkara Wakaf Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif (Studi terhadap Putusan PA Cilegon Nomor 281/Pdt.P/2011/PA.CLG). IAIN Kediri, 2024.
  7. Fathony, Alvan. “Maqasid Al-Syariah sebagai Konsep Dasar dalam Teori Pembentukan Hukum Islam di Indonesia.” Jurnal Islam Nusantara 2, no. 2 (2018): 269–281. https://doi.org/10.33852/jurnalin.v2i2.103.
  8. Kristanto, Respati Bayu, and Hervina Puspitosari. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Saksi Testimonium de Auditu dalam Tindak Pidana Kejahatan terhadap Kesusilaan (Tinjauan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor 1361/Pid.B/2022/PN.Sby).” UNES Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 6653–6664.
  9. Massofia, Fitrah Dinanti, and Rahmawati. “Konsep Rahmatan Lil Alamin pada QS Al-Anbiya Ayat 107 (Kajian Tafsir Al-Quran).” Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Tafsir 2, no. 2 (2023): 143–150. https://doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v2i2.84.
  10. Mubarrak, Husni, Bukhari Ali, and Sindi Rahmadani. “Istifadah Witness (Testimonium de Auditu) for Marriage Authentication (Analysis of Kuala Simpang Religious Court Ruling Number 10/Pdt.P/2021/MS.Ksg).” Media Syariah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial 25, no. 2 (2023): 204–218. https://doi.org/10.22373/jms.v25i2.17009.
  11. Muntalib, Dita Wardhani. Testimonium de Auditu Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam (Studi Putusan MK No. 65/PUU-VIII/2010). Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2018.
  12. Nanis, Volkes. “Kesaksian Testimonium de Auditu dalam Upaya Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif.” EKOMA: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi 3, no. 2 (2024): 957–965.
  13. Nofiardi, Nofiardi. “Testimonium de Auditu Witness: Comparison of Maslahah in the Settlement of Syiqaq in the Religious Courts of the Border Regions.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam 7, no. 2 (2023): 1016–1036. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i2.11493.
  14. Novitasari, Yeni. Studi tentang Kekuatan Pembuktian Saksi Testimonium de Auditu dalam Perkara Gugatan Perceraian. Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2023.
  15. Nur, Muh Tahmid. “Maslahah dalam Hukum Pidana Islam.” Jurnal Diskursus Islam 1, no. 2 (2013): 289–314. https://doi.org/10.24252/jdi.v1i2.6633.
  16. Permatasari, Siti Rahmaayu Dwi, Riska Amalia Ramadani, Muhammad Imam Sejati, and Kurniati Kurniati. “Sejarah Perkembangan Ushul Fiqih, Tokoh-Tokoh Ushuliyah, dan Kitab-Kitab Ushul Fiqih.” Akhlak: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Filsafat 2, no. 2 (2025): 126–136. https://doi.org/10.61132/akhlak.v2i2.649.
  17. Pratama, Aditya Putra Arif. Testimonium de Auditu dalam Perkara Cerai Gugat Perspektif Hukum Islam. UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, 2024.
  18. Rifai, Nurul Inayah. “Analisis Yuridis Kekuatan Alat Bukti Circumstantial Evidence atau Indirect Evidence dalam Proses Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian.” Lex Privatum 13, no. 1 (2024).
  19. Rofii, Ahmad. “Kepastian Epistemologi Hukum Islam: Kritik Al-Syatibi terhadap Konsep Qati dan Zanni.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (2013): 15–26. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v7i1.573.
  20. Rosyid, Muhammad Aenur, and Hoirun Nisa. “Kualitas Kesaksian Testimonium de Auditu pada Putusan Mahkamah Syariyah Aceh terhadap Tindak Pidana Perkosaan Anak.” Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam 9, no. 1 (2023): 76–91.
  21. Sebayang, Dea Chrysta. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Keterangan Saksi Testimonium de Auditu dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana KDRT.” Skripsi, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2022.
  22. Siti, Salwa, Hamdani Hamdani, and Yulia Yulia. “Penerapan Saksi Testimonium de Auditu dalam Perkara Itsbat Nikah di Mahkamah Syariah Bireuen.” Suloh: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh 7, no. 1 (2019): 1–28.
  23. Situmorang, Nedi Gunawan. “Kedudukan Hukum Keterangan Saksi Testimonium de Auditu sebagai Alat Bukti yang Sah Pra dan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 65/PUU-VIII/2010.” Pakuan Law Review 6, no. 2 (2020).
  24. Syihan, Nufair Ahmad. “Tabayyun as a Mechanism for Verifying Criminal Cases in Islamic Criminal Law: An Analysis of QS Al-Hujurat Verse 6.” SHISHYA: Studies and Perspectives on Law and Justice 1, no. 2 (2025): 80–89. https://doi.org/10.63306/qfgy2g95.
  25. Zulfiqri, Muhammad, Budi Bahreisy, and Romi Asmara. “Kekuatan Hukum Pembuktian terhadap Keterangan Saksi de Auditu dalam Hukum Acara Pidana.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh 8, no. 2 (2025): 131–151.