Article Sidebar

Submitted
Dec 31, 2025
Accepted
Jan 27, 2026
Published
Jan 30, 2026
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the patterns of handling online fraud crimes through digital evidence at the Surakarta Police and to assess their conformity from the perspectives of Indonesia’s positive law and Islamic criminal law. This research employs field research complemented by library research, using a qualitative approach with a juridical-empirical and normative-comparative method. The findings indicate that the use of digital evidence in investigative practices has largely complied with the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, although it remains constrained by technical verification issues and the maintenance of the chain of custody. From the perspective of Islamic criminal law, digital evidence may be positioned as qarinah that possesses evidentiary value insofar as it fulfills the principles of al-bayyinah. This study demonstrates the normative convergence between positive law and Islamic law in strengthening a substantively just model of criminal proof in the digital era.


 

Keywords

Online Fraud Digital Evidence Positive Law

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Berlian Nurjanah, D., & Masrukhin, M. (2026). Penanganan Tindak Pidana Penipuan Online melalui Alat Bukti Digital di Kepolisian Surakarta: Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam. Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 11(1), 36-52. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v11i1.13733

References

  1. Alias, Mohamad Aniq Aiman, Wan Abdul Fattah Wan Ismail, Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin, Hasnizam Hashim, and Tuan Muhammad Faris Hamzi Tuan Ibrahim. “Digital Forensics and the Authentication of Electronic Evidence: Enhancing Integrity, Admissibility, and Legal Reform in Malaysian Syariah Courts.” Syariah and Law Discourse 6, no. 1 (2025): 7–14.
  2. Alias, Muhammad Nazir, Muhammad Najib Abdullah, Mohd Farihal Osman, Nor Faizah Ismail, and Mohd Sham Kamis. “The Position of Maqasid Al-Shariah within Islamic Legal Sources: A Comprehensive Analysis.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam 9, no. 2 (2025): 937–964. https://doi.org/10.22373/q4byre51.
  3. Ananta, Klarisa Desi, Triyo Ambodo, and Agus Tohawi. “Pengaruh Media Sosial terhadap Peningkatan Kejahatan Siber di Indonesia.” Islamic Law: Jurnal Siyasah 9, no. 2 (2024): 118–131. https://doi.org/10.53429/iljs.v9i2.858.
  4. Beltran, Pablo Lopez-Aguilar. “LOCARD: Lawful Evidence Collecting and Continuity Platform Development.” Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications 1, no. 1 (2020): 51–55. https://doi.org/10.26220/iisa.3319.
  5. Cotrina, Lisseth Katherine Chuquitucto, Pedro Manuel Silva Leon, Carla Angelica Reyes Reyes, et al. “Cyber Crimes: A Systematic Review of Evolution, Trends, and Research Approaches.” Journal of Educational and Social Research 14, no. 5 (2024): 96. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0124.
  6. Dewi, Ni Made Trisna, and Reido Lardiza Fahrial. “Suatu Kajian Yuridis terhadap Penggunaan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Kejahatan Siber dalam Sistem Penegakan Hukum.” Jurnal Hukum Saraswati (JHS) 3, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.36733/jhshs.v3i2.2949.
  7. Haetami, Enden. “The Strength of Electronic Evidence in the View of Islamic Law.” International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC) 4, no. 4 (2022): 666–675. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v4i4.615.
  8. Hasnawati, Hasnawati, and Mohammad Safrin. “Kedudukan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana.” Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam 5, no. 2 (2023): 1207–1214. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.2878.
  9. Ibrahim, Tuan Muhammad Faris Hamzi Tuan, Mohamad Aniq Aiman Alias, Nasrul Hisyam Nor Muhamad, and Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin. “Digital Forensics in the Syariah Court: Framework of Evidentiary Admissibility and Integrity in Syariah Criminal Law.” Journal of Muwafaqat 8, no. 2 (2025): 78–100. https://doi.org/10.53840/muwafaqat.v8i2.197.
  10. Ibrahim, Tuan Muhammad Faris Hamzi Tuan, Nasrul Hisyam Nor Muhamad, and Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin. “Maqasid Al-Shariah and Digital Forensics: Towards a Fiqh-Based Evidentiary Model in Syariah Criminal Justice.” Al-Adalah 22, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v22i2.27886.
  11. Kipngetich, Amos. “A Review of Online Scams and Financial Frauds in the Digital Age.” GSC Advanced Research and Reviews 22, no. 1 (2025): 302–329. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2025.22.1.0025.
  12. Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman, Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi, and Mulyarto. Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber tentang Metode-Metode Baru. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press), 1992.
  13. Moussa, Ahmad Fekry. “Electronic Evidence and Its Authenticity in Forensic Evidence.” Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences 11, no. 1 (2021): 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-021-00234-6.
  14. Nelson, Rivan. “Analisis Yuridis mengenai Pembuktian Informasi Elektronik (Digital Evidence) sebagai Alat Bukti yang Sah dalam Hukum Acara Pidana.” Lex Privatum 10, no. 5 (2022). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/42831.
  15. Priyana, Puti, Singgih Hasanul Baluqia, and Wahyu Darmawan. “Alat Bukti Informasi Elektronik Tindak Pidana Penipuan Online dalam Perspektif Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 9, no. 1 (2021): 183–198. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v9i1.848.
  16. Sari, Erlina Permata, Deyana Annisa Febrianti, and Riska Hikmah Fauziah. “Fenomena Penipuan Transaksi Jual Beli Online melalui Media Baru Berdasarkan Kajian Space Transition Theory.” Deviance: Jurnal Kriminologi 6, no. 2 (2022): 153–168. https://doi.org/10.36080/djk.1882.
  17. Siregar, Zulkifli Anwar, Rafiqi Rafiqi, and Nanang Tomi Sitorus. “Tinjauan Yuridis Pembuktian Elektronik dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Penipuan Online.” Arbiter: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum 6, no. 2 (2024): 219–231. https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v6i2.5343.
  18. Sudawirawan, I. Komang, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi, and Putu Suwantara. “Kekuatan Alat Bukti dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Teknologi Informasi (Cybercrime).” Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum 4, no. 2 (2023): 184–189. https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.4.2.6798.184-189.
  19. Sujatmiko, Bambang, and Bambang Soesatyo. “The Urgency of Using Electronic Evidence in Trials as an Effort to Answer the Challenges of Law Enforcement in the Digital Era and Social Media Dynamics.” Asian Journal of Social and Humanities 3, no. 9 (2025): 1604–1613. https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v3i9.567.
  20. Sunariyo, Sunariyo, Elviandri Elviandri, Uut Rahayuningsih, and Bayu Prasetyo. “Sosialisasi Pembuktian Cyber Crime dalam KUHAP dan UU ITE.” Jurnal Masyarakat Madani Indonesia 4, no. 3 (2025): 649–658. https://doi.org/10.59025/s6yw8h91.