Main Article Content

Abstract

Eigenrichting itself is a crime that can cause harm to the offender as a result of his own actions, this action arises due to mistrust and distrust of law enforcement and the law itself is confronted by the public. On the other hand, as a result of these actions resulted in the emergence of victims, herein lies the problem to be investigated in this study of how eigenrichting acts which initially as a form of public response from crime turn themselves into criminals. This type of research is the Library Research, with the nature of analytic-comparative research with a juridical-normative approach. From the results of the study it was concluded that in positive law perpetrators of eigenrichting crimes can be charged under article 170 of the Criminal Code, regulating legal sanctions for perpetrators of violence against people or goods in public while in fiqh the jinayah is known as al-tawfuq where several people who commit a crime together without prior agreement because of the psychological influence and thoughts that come suddenly and the given uqubat will also be dropped according to their respective roles.

Article Details

How to Cite
Efendi, S. (2020). Kejahatan Main Hakim Sendiri (Eigenrichting) Menurut Hukum Positif Dan Fiqh Jinayah. Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 5(1), 53-71. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v5i1.1819

References

  1. Abidin, Zainal. Dan Supriyadi Widodo Eddyono. 2017. Degradasi Extraordinary Crimes Problematika Perumusan Kejahatan Genosida, dan Kejahatan Terhadap Kemanusiaan dalam RKUHP. Jakarta: Institute for Criminal Justice Reform.
  2. Ath-Thabari, Abu Ja’far Muhammad bin Jarir. 2008. Tafsir ath-Thabari, terj. Akhmad Affandi. Jakarta: Pustaka Azzam.
  3. Cassese,Antonio 1993. Hak-hak Asasi Manusia di Dunia yang Berubah, terj. A. Rahman. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  4. Davies, Peter. 1994. Hak-hak Asasi Manusia: Sebuah Bunga Rampai. Terj. A. Rahman Zainuddin. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  5. Effendi, A. Masyhur. Dan Taufani S. Evandri. 2010. HAM dalam Dimensi/Dinamika Yuridis, Sosial, Politik: dan Proses Penyusunan/Aplikasi Ha-Kham (Hukum Hak Asasi Dalam Masyarakat. Bogor: Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia.
  6. Hakiem, Mohammad Luqman. 1992. Deklarasi Islam tentang HAM. Surabaya: Risalah Gusti.
  7. Hiariej, Eddy O.S. 2010. Pengadilan atas Beberapa Kejahatan Serius terhadap Hak Asasi manusia. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
  8. https://international.sindonews.com/read/1380455/45/kasus-kasus-genosida- terbesar-yang-tercatat-dalam-sejarah-1550656869.
  9. https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deklarasi_Kairo_tentang_Hak_Asasi_Manusia_dalam islam,
  10. Hussain, Syekh Syaukat. 1996. Hak-hak Manusia dalam Islam. Terj. Abdul Rochim. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press.
  11. Maulana, Makhrur Adam. 2015. Konsepsi HAM dalam Islam: Antara Universalitas dan Partikularitas. Yogyakarta: CV. Pustaka Ilmu Group.
  12. Putrawan, Agus Dedi. 2016. “Membumikan Deklarasi Kairo di Indonesia: Perlindungan terhadap Hak Anak dan Keluarga”. Tasamuh. Vol. 14. No. 2. Juni. Dalam https://journal.uinmataram.ac.id.
  13. Sadri, Matinus. “Mengenal Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Islam Berdasarkan Deklarasi Kairo”. Makalah. Dalam https://repository.umy.ac.id.
  14. Shihab, M. Quraish. 2002. Tafsir al-Mishbah: Pesan, Kesan, dan Keserasian al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Lentera Hati. Vol. 15.
  15. Suny, Ismail. “Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia”. Hukum dan Pembangunan, Juni 1992. Dalam https://jhp.ui.ac.
  16. Washil, Izzudin dan Ahmad Khoirul Fata. “HAM Islam dan DUHAM PBB:Sebuah Ikhtiar Mencari Titik Temu”. Miqot. Vol. XLI. No. 2. Juli-Desember. Dalam https://media.neliti.com.
  17. Zein, Yahya Ahmad. “Konsep Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Islam (Mengungkapkan Korelasi antara Islam dengan HAM)”. Makalah. Dalam https://journal.unpar.ac.id.
  18. Zulfa, Eva Achjani. 2015. “Menelaah Arti Hak untuk Hidup sebagai Hak Asasi Manusia”. Lex Jurnalica, Vol. 3 / No. 1 / April. Dalam https://media.neliti.com.