Article Sidebar

Submitted
Apr 20, 2023
Accepted
Jun 9, 2023
Published
Jun 13, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 245 Download : 461

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Decision Number 6/JN/2023/MS.Lsk sentenced perpetrators of sexual abuse of children to be whipped 35 times. This sentence is different from the Supreme Court Circular and the Attorney General Circular which require prison sentences for perpetrators if the victim is a child in cases of sexual abuse and rape. The research aims to analyze why the panel of judges sentenced them to caning and how to protect children. The research method used is normative juridical research method. The primary legal material is in the form of decision Number 6/JN/2023/MS.Lsk, Jinayat Law Qanun and Jinayat Procedural Law Qanun. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively by providing an interpretation of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The results of the study show that the imposition of caning punishment on perpetrators of sexual harassment whose victims are children has not been in favor of child protection. The imposition of caning was in accordance with the QHJ and QHAJ, because the judge was given the authority to impose a sentence according to the prosecutor's demands or differently. However, this does not pay attention to SEMA Number 10 of 2020 which wants prison sentences for perpetrators of sexual abuse of children.

Keywords

Canning Sexual Harassment SEMA SEJA

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Zainuddin, M. (2023). Penjatuhan Hukuman Cambuk Terhadap Pelaku Pelecehan Seksual Terhadap Anak. Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 8(1), 58-74. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v8i1.5960

References

  1. Arto, Mukti. Praktek Perkara Perdata Pada Pengadilan Agam. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2004.
  2. Azharuddin, Azharuddin. “Implementasi Pasal 67 Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hukum Jinayat.” Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam 6, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v6i1.2921.
  3. Istriani, Istriani, and Laila Marotus Khoiriyah. “Penerapan Asas Kepentingan Terbaik Bagi Anak Berdasarkan Perpektif Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.” LITERATUS 4, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.37010/lit.v4i2.871.
  4. Khairida, Khairida, Syahrizal Syahrizal, and Mohd. Din. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pelecehan Seksual Pada Anak Dalam Sistem Peradilan Jinayat.” Syiah Kuala Law Journal 1, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v1i1.12282.
  5. Krisna, Liza Agnesta, and Rini Fitriani. “Dualisme Kewenangan Mengadili Perkara Anak Sebagai Pelaku Kejahatan Pelecehan Seksual Di Kota Langsa-Aceh.” Jurnal Yuridis 5, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.35586/.v5i2.771.
  6. Mansari, Mansari, and Muslim Zainuddin. "Independensi Hakim Mahkamah Syar'iyah dalam Menjatuhkan'Uqubat bagi Pelaku Pelanggaran Jarimah Qanun Jinayat." (2023): 159-179.
  7. Mansari, Hasnul Arifin Melayu. “Pembatalan Hukuman Cambuk Bagi Pelaku Jarimah Pencabulan Anak Dalam Putusan Nomor 07/JN/2016/MS.Aceh.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 7, no. 07 (2018): 425–40.
  8. Oslami, Ahmad Fikri, and Zahrul Fatahillah. "‘Uqubat Terhadap Jarimah Zina Yang Melibatkan Anak." Jurnal Yudisial 14, no. 3 (2022): 375-393.
  9. Muhammad, Rosmawardani. “Analysis Of Absolute Competence Of District Courts And Syari’ah Courts In Adjudicating Jarimah Of Child Sexual Abuse In Aceh.” Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah 5, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v5i2.103.
  10. Muthalib, Salman Abdul. “Analisis Kepentingan Terbaik Bagi Anak Dalam Hukum Jinayat.” Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 2021.
  11. Prakoso, Abintoro. Pembaharuan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak,. Surabaya: Laksbang Grafika, 2013.
  12. R. Fakhrurrazi. “Jarimah Zina Dan Pemerkosaan Dalam Qanun Jinayat Aceh: Analisis Perumusan Metode Istinbath.” Islam Universalia: International Journal of Islamic Studies and Social Sciences 1, no. 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.56613/islam-universalia.v1i3.137.
  13. Rachmad, Andi, Yusi Amdani, and Zaki Ulya. “Kontradiksi Pengaturan Hukuman Pelaku Pelecehan Seksual Terhadap Anak Di Aceh.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 10, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.10.2.2021.315-336.
  14. Samsul Bahri, and Mansari. “Model Pengawasan Anak Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Pelecehan Seksual Di Lingkungan Pesantren.” Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam 6, no. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v6i2.3518.