Article Sidebar

Submitted
Mar 12, 2024
Accepted
Jun 29, 2024
Published
Jun 29, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 196 Download : 155

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the verdict of the Lubuk Pakam District Court Case Number 1300/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Lbp related to a sexual abuse case by the defendant Hasanuddin, who used deception and lies. The focus of the research is the role of the medical report (visum) as evidence in the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP) and the judge's consideration of using visum in sentencing. This article is classified as a literature study with a qualitative approach. The methodology used is normative legal study. The research findings indicate that the status of the visum in sexual abuse cases is considered valid and has high evidentiary value. The judge considered the visum along with witness testimony and assessed their correlation in supporting the criminal act, resulting in Hasanuddin being found guilty in accordance with the charges brought by the Public Prosecutor.

Keywords

Sexual Abuse Medical Report Evidence

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Ambarita, N., Batubara, S. A., Wijaya, W., Hasibuan, B., & Fitriani. (2024). Visum Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Anak: Studi Putusan No.1300/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn.Lbp. Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 9(1), 41-52. Retrieved from http://journal.iainlangsa.ac.id/index.php/legalite/article/view/8188

References

  1. Ahmad U, Nur, Kasjim Salenda, and A. Ummu Fauziyyah Syafruddin. “Peranan Visum Et Repertum dalam Mengungkap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Perspektif Hukum Islam di Pengadilan Negeri Sungguminasa.” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab 2, no. 3 (September 13, 2021): 629–41. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v2i3.21462.
  2. Ali, Ismail, Junardi, and Andi Sulfiati. “Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan.” Legal Journal of Law 2, no. 1 (May 15, 2023): 43–55.
  3. Ariyadi, Ariyadi. “Tindak Pidana Pelaku Eksploitasi Seksual Pada Anak Di Tinjau Dari Hukum Positif.” Jurnal Hadratul Madaniyah 5, no. 2 (December 3, 2018): 73–88. https://doi.org/10.33084/jhm.v5i2.888.
  4. Dhammananda, Dwi Ratna Kamala Sari Lukman, and Ni Nyoman Ernita Ratnadewi. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Visum Et Repertum Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan: (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 221/Pid.B/2022/PN.Mtr.).” Metta: Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin 3, no. 2 (July 18, 2023): 127–32. https://doi.org/10.37329/metta.v3i2.2640.
  5. Fernando, Youngky. “Ketika Kejahatan Berdaulat Dalam Jubah Penegakan Hukum Maka Hukumpun Tak Dapat Menyentuhnya.” Jurnal Ilmiah Cahaya Hukum 2, no. 1 (October 28, 2022): 82–82.
  6. Jovita, Ayu Welly, and Anggraeni Endah Kusumaningrum. “Tanggung Jawab Hukum Dokter Di Bidang Pelayanan Forensik Dalam Pembuatan Visum Et Repertum Perkara Pidana Asusila.” JURNAL HUKUM KESEHATAN INDONESIA 2, no. 02 (October 31, 2022): 121–31. https://doi.org/10.53337/jhki.v2i02.82.
  7. Monita, Yulia, and Dheny Wahyudhi. “Peranan Dokter Forensik Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Pidana.” INOVATIF | Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 7 (2013): 127–41.
  8. Paramita, Acintya. “Kendala Pembuatan Visum Et Repertum Pada Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Anak Atau Infanticide: Studi Instalansi Kedokteran Forensik Di Rumah Sakit Saiful Anwar Malang.” Sarjana, Universitas Brawijaya, 2009. http://repository.ub.ac.id/id/eprint/110344/.
  9. Prasad, Gowinda, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi, and I. Made Minggu Widyantara. “Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Tindak Pidana Daya Paksa dan Pembelaan Terpaksa.” Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum 2, no. 3 (September 1, 2021): 483–88. https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.2.3.3621.483-488.
  10. Putri, Athaya Novita Andryanto, and Ahmad Sholikhin Ruslie. “Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga.” Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance 3, no. 2 (January 20, 2023): 1433–47. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i2.257.
  11. Ramadhina, Maghfira, and Aryo Fadlian. “Visum Et Repertum Dalam Mengungkap Kasus Pembunuhan Berencana.” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan 8, no. 9 (June 10, 2022): 92–98. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6631345.
  12. Siadari, Hamidah, Nur Rochaeti, and Bambang Dwi Baskoro. “Arti Penting Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Perkosaan.” Diponegoro Law Journal 5, no. 3 (July 13, 2016): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2016.12573.
  13. Sitompul, Ariman. “The Use of Forensic Physician Expertise In View of Health Law Against Murder Cases.” SASI 29, no. 1 (March 11, 2023): 112–23. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v29i1.1281.
  14. Sugiarto, Totok. “Peranan Visum Et Repertum Dalam Mengungkap Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan.” IUS: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum 6, no. 2 (2018): 43–62. https://doi.org/10.51747/ius.v6i2.656.
  15. Sujadi. “Visum Et Repertum Pada Tahap Penyidikan Dalammengungkap Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan.” Jurnal Legalitas 5, no. 01 (February 1, 2012): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v5i01.880.