Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 27, 2024
Accepted
Jun 25, 2024
Published
Jun 27, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 207 Download : 255

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The police, as an institution that should provide a sense of security to the community, are often involved in violations of the law themselves. One such case of legal violation involving members of the police occurred at the Banyumas City Police Station (Polresta Banyumas). Eleven members of Polresta Banyumas and ten detainees were involved in the criminal act of assault against a detainee in a theft case, which resulted in the detainee's death. Seven of the eleven members of Polresta Banyumas have been sanctioned for violating the code of ethics by failing to supervise the detainee, leading to the assault. Based on this, it is necessary to examine the legal consequences for detainees who commit acts of assault within the detention facility under orders from police officers. This research employs a normative juridical method, where the study is conducted by examining literature or secondary data using a case approach, a statute approach, and a conceptual approach. The results of this research explain that the defendants were merely following orders from the Banyumas City Police officers, who are the authorized authorities. Therefore, the detainees should be acquitted of all charges because they committed the assault not of their own volition but under the orders of the police officers as the authorized authorities.

Keywords

Orders of Office Excuses Criminal Acts

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Basyaruloh Yahya, A. Z. (2024). Studi Putusan Pengadilan dalam Kasus Penganiayaan oleh Tahanan di Bawah Arahan Kepolisian: Sebuah Kajian Hukum. Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 9(1), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v9i1.8514

References

  1. Aldanta, R. Rivaldi, and Frans Simangunsong. “Tanggungjawab Pidana Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian: Putusan Perkara Nomor 590/Pid.B/2019/PN Sim.” Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance 3, no. 1 (January 1, 2023): 897–920. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i1.223.
  2. Anshar, Ryanto Ulil, and Joko Setiyono. “Tugas dan Fungsi Polisi Sebagai Penegak Hukum dalam Perspektif Pancasila.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 2, no. 3 (August 28, 2020): 359–72. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i3.359-372.
  3. Elvira, Elvira. “Birokrasi Dan Korupsi Dalam Penggunaan Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) Pada Pemerintahan Daerah Kabupaten Donggala Sulawesi Tengah Pada Tahun 2013-2015.” Iqra: Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan Dan Keislaman 16, no. 1 (July 7, 2021): 22–27. https://doi.org/10.56338/iqra.v16i1.1588.
  4. Fardha, Katrin Valencia. “Perkembangan Teori-Teori Hukum Pidana.” Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research 3, no. 5 (October 20, 2023): 3982–91. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v3i5.5103.
  5. Fathanah, Putri, Sukmareni, and Yenny Fitri Z. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelanggaran Standar Operasional Prosedur Pada Proses Penangkapan.” Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam 8, no. 2 (December 25, 2023): 132–51. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v8i2.6848.
  6. Fauziah, Nur Laeli. “Penghapusan Pidana Bagi Pejabat Negara Penerima Gratifikasi.” Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam 1, no. 1 (June 1, 2015): 29–60. https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2015.1.1.29-60.
  7. Hasbullah, Hasbullah. “Perintah Atasan Atau Jabatan (Ambtelijk Bevel) Sebagai Penyebab Korupsi Di Lingkungan Birokrasi.” Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, Dan Seni 1, no. 1 (May 10, 2017): 84–94. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmishumsen.v1i1.338.
  8. Lubis, Fitria, and Syawal Amry Siregar. “Analisis Penghapusan Pidana Terhadap Perbuatan Menghilangkan Nyawa Orang Lain Karena Alasan Adanya Daya Paksa (Overmacht).” Jurnal Retentum 2, no. 1 (March 20, 2020): 9–16. https://doi.org/10.46930/retentum.v2i1.425.
  9. Marthauli, Theresia, Maria Heny Pratiknjo, and Jetty E. T. Mawara. “Orientasi Nilai Tugas Polisi Dalam Melayani Masyarakat Di Polresta Manado.” Holistik; Journal of Social and Culture 15, no. 1 (2022): 1–18.
  10. Maysarah, Andi. “Perubahan Dan Perkembangan Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia.” Warta Dharmawangsa, no. 52 (2017): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v0i52.252.
  11. Muksin, Muchlas Rastra Samara. “Tujuan Pemidanaan Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Sapientia Et Virtus 8, no. 1 (July 10, 2023): 225–47. https://doi.org/10.37477/sev.v8i1.465.
  12. Naibaho, Samuel Fernando Bofrianda, Alpi Sahari, and Agusta Ridha Minin. “Penjatuhan Putusan Bebas Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Secara Bersama-Sama Dalam Perspektif Teori Pembuktian (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 711/K.Pid/2022).” Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum 5, no. 1 (March 13, 2024): 29–42. https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v5i1.478.
  13. Nazifah, Nabila. “Hak Narapidana Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Di Lembaga Permasyarakatan Kelas II A Samarinda.” Nomos: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 3 (May 28, 2021): 98–105. https://doi.org/10.56393/nomos.v1i3.574.
  14. Paradiaz, Rosania, and Eko Soponyono. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Pelecehan Seksual.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 4, no. 1 (January 31, 2022): 61–72. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i1.61-72.
  15. Prasad, Gowinda, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi, and I. Made Minggu Widyantara. “Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Tindak Pidana Daya Paksa dan Pembelaan Terpaksa.” Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum 2, no. 3 (September 1, 2021): 483–88. https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.2.3.3621.483-488.
  16. Pratiwi, Siswantari. “Delik Penyertaan Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP).” Binamulia Hukum 11, no. 1 (2022): 69–80. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v11i1.307.
  17. Rosadi, Reski Viranda, and Ida Keumala Jeumpa. “Studi Kasus Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Siak Nomor 05/PID.SUS.ANAK/2014/PN.SIAK Tentang Tindak Pidana Membantu Pembunuhan Berencana.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Pidana 3, no. 3 (August 30, 2019): 478–86.
  18. Silalahi, Reni, Ira Malau, Rani Nainggolan, Mhd Rastami, Parlaungan Siahaan, and Dewi Lumbanbatu. “The Role of Witnesses in Prosecuting Cases of Fatal Assault: Legal and Sociological Perspectives.” Jurnal Hukum Sehasen 9, no. 2 (October 27, 2023): 429–38. https://doi.org/10.37676/jhs.v9i2.5053.
  19. Simamora, Timothy Sutanto, and Ade Adhari. “Batasan Pelaksanaan Perintah Jabatan Sebagai Alasan Pembenar Dalam Syarat Pemidanaan.” Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial 10, no. 2 (April 3, 2023): 506–19. https://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v10i2.2023.506-519.
  20. Sumadi, Ahmad Fadlil. “Hukum Dan Keadilan Sosial Dalam Perspektif Hukum Ketatanegaraan.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 4 (2015): 849–71. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1249.
  21. Zaenal, A Nurfakhriyah. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penganiayaan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Atasan Kepada Bawahan Dalam Lingkup Tni Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian (Studi Kasus Putusan No.156-K/PM.II-09/AD/IX/2021).” Skripsi, Universtas Hasanuddin Makassar, 2022.