Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jun 28, 2024
Accepted
Jul 12, 2024
Published
Jul 18, 2024
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 253 Download : 285

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The formalization of Islamic criminal law in Aceh until now is still reaping debates, one of the debates that arises regarding the proposed stoning penalty for adultery offenders. The debate arises because the Qanun Jinayat that regulates adultery is not like what is regulated in Islamic law. This led to various arguments that the qanun was made not serious and full of ruling interests. This research departs from the important question of why the specific legal sanctions for adultery offenders in Qanun Jinayat do not differentiate between muhsan and ghairu muhsan adulterers. Doctrinal method is used in this research to see the legal aspects of adultery regulated in Qanun Jinayat, the approach used is legislation and legal politics. This paper argues that the application of stoning law for muhsan adulterers can be enforced depending on the government agreement. When viewed from a legal aspect, stoning punishment cannot be applied in Aceh, because Aceh is part of the Indonesian government which has legal norms and values in law enforcement. Stoning is a form of death penalty that involves pain for the perpetrator which is considered by human rights as torture. In the Indonesian criminal law context, the death penalty is a severe criminal legal sanction that can be applied to the perpetrator if his actions are classified as serious crimes. In Islam, the death penalty can be applied to those who take the lives of others. This shows that legally and politically, stoning is difficult to enforce in Aceh. However, stoning punishment can be enforced by being equated to castration punishment as a form of law enforcement or exiled in a remote place as a form of providing a deterrent effect for the perpetrator.

Keywords

Stoning flogging Zina Fiqh Qanun

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Nairazi, N., Akmal, A., Ferizal, I., & Manoppo, F. R. (2024). Fiqh dan Negara: Dinamika Penerapan Sanksi Hukuman Zina di Aceh . Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 9(1), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v9i1.8929

References

  1. Adawiah, Rabiatul, and Ihsan Kamaludin. “Dynamics of Law Enforcement of the Islamic Criminal Law in Aceh in the Indonesian Democratic System.” Islam Transformatif : Journal of Islamic Studies 5, no. 2 (December 31, 2021): 97–111. https://doi.org/10.30983/it.v5i1.4721.
  2. Bates, Thomas R. “Gramsci and the Theory of Hegemony.” Journal of the History of Ideas 36, no. 2 (April 1975): 351. https://doi.org/10.2307/2708933.
  3. Brown, Valerie J. Atkinson. Legal Research via The Internet. Albany, NY: West Thomson Learning, 2001.
  4. Bustamam-Ahmad, Kamaruzzaman. “The Aplication of Islamic Law in Indonesia: The Case Study in Aceh.” JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN ISLAM 1, no. 1 (June 1, 2007): 130–80. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2007.1.1.135-180.
  5. Fadlia, Faradilla, Novi Susilawati, Ismar Ramadani, and Novita Sari. “Deterring or Entertaining? Can the Caning Punishment Execution in Aceh Meet Its Objective?” Mazahib, no. 1 (June 25, 2020): 41–78. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v19i1.2055.
  6. Fahmi, Mutiara, Nurhayati Ali Hasan, Iskandar Usman, Amiruddin Abdullah, and Muhibuddin Hanafiyah. “Punishment for Zina Muḥṣān Offenders in Aceh Qanun No. 6 of 2014 in the Perspective of Fiqh al-Siyāsah.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 6, no. 1 (June 27, 2022): 346–68. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i1.13363.
  7. Fakhrurrazi, R. “Jarimah Zina Dan Pemerkosaan Dalam Qanun Jinayat Aceh: Analisis Perumusan Metode Istinbath:” Islam Universalia: International Journal of Islamic Studies and Social Sciences 1, no. 3 (January 29, 2020): 400–433. https://doi.org/10.56613/islam-universalia.v1i3.137.
  8. Hakim, Hary Abdul, Ming Hsi Sung, Chrisna Bagus Edhita Praja, Mutia Qori Dewi Masithoh, and Salsabila Rahadatul’ Aisy. “The Islamic Law within the ‎Indonesian Legal System ‎(A Case Study of Islamic Sharia Law ‎in Aceh)‎.” TSAQAFAH 17, no. 2 (2021): 349–62. https://doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v17i2.6213.
  9. Hasni, Khairul. “English Sharia Police: Gender Discrimination, and Elite Politics in Aceh.” Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education 4, no. 1 (June 26, 2020): 30. https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v4i1.57.
  10. Joseph, Jonathan. “A Realist Theory of Hegemony.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 30, no. 2 (June 2000): 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00125.
  11. Li, Xin, Rob Law, Gang Xie, and Shouyang Wang. “Review of Tourism Forecasting Research with Internet Data.” Tourism Management 83 (April 1, 2021): 104245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104245.
  12. Magfiroh, Ririn Isna, and Ashif Az Zafi. “Eksistensi Fikih Dalam Penerapan Hukum Zina Di Indonesia.” DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 18, no. 1 (July 21, 2020): 102–17. https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v18i1.1314.
  13. McConville, Mike. Research Methods for Law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017.
  14. Mudhoffir, Abdil Mughis. “Teori Kekuasaan Michel Foucault: Tantangan Bagi Sosiologi Politik.” MASYARAKAT: Jurnal Sosiologi 18, no. 1 (January 3, 2013): 75–100. https://doi.org/10.7454/mjs.v18i1.3734.
  15. Mudrika, Syarifah. “Implementasi Jarimah Zina Di Aceh Dalam Perspektif Hadis.” Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam 8, no. 1 (May 2, 2023): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v8i1.5918.
  16. Nasrullah, Nasrullah. “Hukum Syariat Di Aceh.” At-Tafkir 10, no. 2 (December 8, 2017): 1–18.
  17. Saby, Yusny. “The Ulama in Aceh: A Brief Historical Survey.” Studia Islamika 8, no. 1 (2001): 12. https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v8i1.694.
  18. Salim, Arskal. “Adat and Islamic Law in Contemporary Aceh, Indonesia: Unequal Coexistence and Asymmetric Contestation.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 5, no. 2 (December 25, 2021): 529. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.11082.
  19. ———. “Dynamic Legal Pluralism in Indonesia: Contested Legal Orders in Contemporary Aceh.” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 42, no. 61 (January 2010): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2010.10756640.
  20. Santoso, Topo. “Implementation of Islamic Criminal Law in Indonesia: Ta’zir Punishment as a Solution?” IIUM Law Journal 19 (2011): 123.
  21. Surbakti, Natangsa. “Pidana Cambuk Dalam Perspektif Keadilan Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Di Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 17, no. 3 (July 20, 2010): 456–74. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol17.iss3.art6.
  22. Syarbaini, Ahmad. “Konsep Ta’zir Menurut Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam.” Jurnal Tahqiqa : Jurnal Ilmiah Pemikiran Hukum Islam 17, no. 2 (July 31, 2023): 37–48. https://doi.org/10.61393/tahqiqa.v17i2.167.
  23. ———. “Teori Ta’zir Dalam Hukum Pidana Islam.” Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan 2, no. 2 (April 25, 2019). https://doi.org/10.35308/jic.v2i2.967.
  24. Tamam, Khoirul, and Tajul Arifin. “Hukuman Cambuk Di Aceh Dalam Prespektif Hadits Riwayat Muslim Dan Undang Undang 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang HAM.” Doktrin:Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik 2, no. 4 (June 23, 2024): 36–48. https://doi.org/10.59581/doktrin.v2i4.3670.
  25. Toriquddin, Moh. “Teori Maqâshid Syarî’ah Perspektif Al-Syatibi.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah 6, no. 1 (June 30, 2014): 33–47. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v6i1.3190.
  26. Tumbol, Ananda A. “Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Pidana Cambuk Di Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia.” LEX CRIMEN 10, no. 9 (October 21, 2021). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/36559.
  27. Ulya, Zaki. “Dinamika Penerapan Hukum Jinayat Sebagai Wujud Rekonstruksi Syariâ’at Islam Di Aceh.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 5, no. 1 (April 30, 2016): 135–48. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v5i1.9.
  28. Zulkarnain, Zulkarnain. “Dinamika Mazhab Shafi’i dengan Cara Aceh: Studi Tentang Praktik Mazhab di Kalangan Tokoh Agama.” Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan 15, no. 2 (2015): 169. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v15i2.159-176.