Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jan 27, 2025
Accepted
Apr 17, 2025
Published
Apr 21, 2025
Download
Pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 82 Download : 159

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Knowledge is a fundamental human necessity that enables individuals to navigate various challenges in life. However, throughout history, a dichotomy has often been drawn between religious knowledge and secular knowledge, leading to a conceptual division of science. This dichotomy has had a detrimental impact on the intellectual and scientific development of the Muslim world, contributing to its decline in science and technology in comparison to the West. This stands in stark contrast to the Islamic Golden Age, during which Islamic civilization served as a center of knowledge and a beacon for Europe, which was then in a period of intellectual stagnation. This study aims to critically examine the dichotomy of knowledge within Islamic thought and to explore integrative solutions for Islamic education in the modern era. Employing a qualitative method through library research, this study reveals that for Islamic education to meet the demands of an increasingly dynamic and globalized world, a balanced integration of religious and secular knowledge is essential. Thus, in addition to understanding religious principles, learners must also acquire practical knowledge and skills applicable to everyday life and relevant to the global labor market.

Keywords

Islamic Education Integration of Sciences Modern Challenges Knowledge Dichotomy

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Damayanti, D., & Sodiman, S. (2025). Kritik terhadap Dikotomi Ilmu dalam Islam: Upaya Menyelaraskan Pengetahuan Agama dan Umum di Era Modern. Lentera, 6(2), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.32505/lentera.v6i2.10863

References

  1. Adriaman, M. (2024). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Yayasan Tri Edukasi Ilmiah.
  2. Amalia, N., Mukhlis, M., & Yusrizal, Y. (2018). Model Penyelesaian Sengketa dan Peradilan Adat di Aceh. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 25(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss1.art8
  3. Amdani, Y. (2014). Proses Pelaksanaan Penyelesaian Perselisihan Di Lembaga Peradilan Adat Aceh Tingkat Gampong (Desa). Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum, 48(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v48i1.86
  4. Anshari, N., & Aminah, A. (2022). Kewenangan Peradilan Adat di Aceh Menurut Qanun No. 10 Tahun 2008 Tentang Lembaga Adat. MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 93–103. https://doi.org/10.47498/maqasidi.vi.1356
  5. Arief, H., & Ambarsari, N. (2018). Penerapan Prinsip Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum, 10(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v10i2.1362
  6. Herlina, A. (2004). Restorative Justice. Indonesian Journal of Criminology, 3(3), 4244.
  7. Imbrogno, A. R., & Imbrogno, S. (2000). Mediation in Court Cases of Domestic Violence. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 81(4), 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.1035
  8. Iqbal, M., Yahya, A., & Kamal, H. (2020). Pola Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Rumah Tangga Melalui Peradilan Adat Gampong Di Aceh. Jurnal Geuthèë: Penelitian Multidisiplin, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.52626/jg.v3i1.72
  9. Kadriah, A., & Sumarna, D. (2024). Analisis Epistemologi Kritis Terhadap Metode Penelitian Hukum Perdata. Jurnal Supermacy Of Law (Ilmu Hukum), 1(1), Article 1.
  10. Kaganas, F., & Piper, C. (1994). Domestic violence and divorce mediation. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 16(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069408413612
  11. Kawengian, O. B., & Larissa, T. Q. A. (2024). Analisis PTSD dalam Kitab Hakim-Hakim 19:22-30 dan Relevansi Misi Perdamaian bagi Gereja Lokal: Berdasarkan Teori Judith Hermann. Tepian : Jurnal Misiologi Dan Komunikasi Kristen, 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.51667/tjmkk.v4i1.1878
  12. Krisnawati, E. (2016). Perilaku Konsumsi Media oleh Kalangan Remaja Dalam Pencarian Informasi (Studi Kasus Perilaku Remaja di Kota Salatiga dalam Penggunaan Media Dalam Perspektif Teori Ketergantungan Media). KOMUNIKATIF : Jurnal Ilmiah Komunikasi, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.33508/jk.v5i1.923
  13. Mawar, S. (2021). Development of Aceh’s Adat Judicial System. Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum, 10(1), 150–170. https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v10i1.10522
  14. Muammar, M., & Taufik, I. (2024). Quo Vadis Penelitian Hukum: Sebuah Jalan Meluruskan Miskonsepsi Kecenderungan Arah Penelitian Hukum. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 7(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i2.7917
  15. Muhazir, M. (2021). Islam, Fatwa dan Negara: Meretas Pluralisme Hukum Perceraian di Aceh. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 15(2), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v15i2.5150
  16. Muhazir, M., Azwir, A., & Zubir, Z. (2024). Legal Institutions in Resolving Divorce Cases in Aceh. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v9i1.8529
  17. Muksalmina, M., & Sari, E. (2023). Kekuatan Putusan Peradilan Adat Di Aceh. Suloh:Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 11(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.29103/sjp.v11i2.6583
  18. Nurdin, M. (2018). Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Peradilan Adat Aceh. Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 3(II), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v3iII.1108
  19. Nybergh, L., Enander, V., & Krantz, G. (2016). Theoretical Considerations on Men’s Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence: An Interview-Based Study. Journal of Family Violence, 31(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9785-8
  20. Rahmawati, C., & Mansur, T. M. (2022). Efektivitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Melalui Peradilan Adat Di Kecamatan Seruway Kabupaten Aceh Tamiang. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Keperdataan, 6(1), Article 1.
  21. Rosidi, A., Zainuddin, M., & Arifiana, I. (2024). Metode Dalam Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Sosiologis (Field Research). Journal Law and Government, 2(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.31764/jlag.v2i1.21606
  22. Susiani, D. (2024). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Tahta Media Group.
  23. Syahputra, M. R. (2024). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dalam Menyelesaikan Problematika Hukum Kontemporer. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.70193/jurisprudensi.v1i02.08
  24. Syam, M., Fitri, D., Ulfanora, U., & Oetama, N. (2023). Pembuktian Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pada Peradilan Adat. Unes Journal of Swara Justisia, 6(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v6i4.303
  25. Syarif, M., & Musfira. (2023). Menyinergikan Peradilan Adat Dalam Penguatan Syariat Islam Di Aceh. Kalam: Jurnal Agama Dan Sosial Humaniora, 11(1), Article 1.
  26. Warini, S., Hidayat, Y. N., & Ilmi, D. (2023). Teori Belajar Sosial Dalam Pembelajaran. ANTHOR: Education and Learning Journal, 2(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.31004/anthor.v2i4.181
  27. Wibowo, G. A., Chairuddin, C., Rahman, A., & Riyadi, R. (2022). Kesetaraan Gender: Sebuah Tijauan Teori Feminisme. SEUNEUBOK LADA: Jurnal ilmu-ilmu Sejarah, Sosial, Budaya dan Kependidikan, 9(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.33059/jsnbl.v10i2.6360