Article Sidebar

Submitted
Dec 10, 2023
Accepted
Jan 11, 2024
Published
Jan 12, 2024
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 265 Download : 199

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This article deals with the search for the recognition and legality of customary marriages on believers of the Suku Asli Anak Rawa in Siak, Riau. The article argued that although the Constitutional Court ordered the writing of identity credentials on the residence documents of citizens of trust holders, it could not be realized because they did not have a trust organizations or holders of trusts. This resulted in a number of Suku Asli Anak Rawa convert to one of the state-recognized religions in order to obtain a document of identity. Ethnographic data was collected through in-depth interviews, semi-structured observations as well as document studies. First, the author explores the indigenous population of the Anak Rawa who still embrace their beliefs and compares them to citizens who have converted to one of the official religions. Second, the researchers explored patterns of strengthening the external social networks of Suku Asli Anak Rawa, both government agencies and relevant social organizations as part of identity strengthening and search for recognition over indigenous marriages. Third, the researchers explored the efforts made by the Suku Asli Rawa in filing a registered status application to have the legality of issuing a marriage certificate. In conclusion, this paper indicates that policy on religious minority groups cannot be implemented immediately because of the limited capacity of citizens to meet administrative demands and bureaucratic processes in government.

Keywords

Indigenous community registration of marriage Suku Asli Anak Rawa

Article Details

How to Cite
Ansor, M., Alwi, R., Zulfikar, I., Masyhur, L. S., & Alit, A. (2024). Pencarian Rekognisi dan Legalitas Perkawinan Secara Adat Pada Suku Asli Anak Rawa di Siak Provinsi Riau. Lentera, 5(2), 151-169. https://doi.org/10.32505/lentera.v5i2.7544

References

  1. Amrifo, Viktor, Arya H. Dharmawan, Satyawan Sunito, dan Endriatmo Soetarto. 2014. “Sejarah Sosiologis Budaya Bernafkah Komunitas Adat Suku Duano.” Paramita: Historical Studies Journal 24(2): 186–99. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/paramita/article/view/3122.
  2. Ansor, Muhammad, dan Laila Sari Masyhur. 2013. “Religion, Marginality and Power Relations: Religious Conversion and Religiosity of the Indigenous People in Penyengat.” Al-Albab 2(2): 169–86. http://jurnaliainpontianak.or.id/index.php/alalbab/article/view/34.
  3. ———. 2023. “Satu kampung enam iman: Penguatan integrasi sosial melalui perayaan Tujuh Liku pada suku asli Anak Rawa di Siak, Riau.” Connection: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 3(1): 1–16. https://journal.iainlangsa.ac.id/index.php/connection/article/view/6242.
  4. Azhar, Al et al. 2008. Suara Pribumi: Respon Orang Sakai, Talang Mamak dan Duano terhadap Program Pemerintah. Pekanbaru: The Riau Institute.
  5. Barnard, Timothy P. 1998. “Multiple centers of authority: Society and environment in Siak and Eastern Sumatra, 1674-1827.” The University of Hawaii.
  6. ———. 2001. “Rules for Rulers: Obscure Texts, Authority, and Policing in Two Malay States.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 32(2): 211–25. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022463401000108/type/journal_article.
  7. Butt, Simon. 2020. “Constitutional Recognition of ‘Beliefs’ in Indonesia.” Journal of Law and Religion 35(3): 450–73. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0748081420000399/type/journal_article.
  8. Charin, Rizky Octa Putri, dan Arief Hidayat. 2019. “The Efforts of Talang Mamak Indigenous People to Maintain Their Existence in Customary Forest Resources Battle.” Society 7(1): 21–36. https://society.fisip.ubb.ac.id/index.php/society/article/view/78.
  9. Cholil, Suhadi. 2009. “The Politico-Religious Contestation: Hardening of the Islamic Law.” In Muslim-Non-Muslim Marriage, Singapore: ISEAS Publishing, 139–58. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1355/9789812308221-008/html.
  10. Faisal, G, dan R Amanati. 2018. “Akit’s house: identification of vernacular coastal architecture in Meranti Island.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 126: 012011. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/126/1/012011.
  11. Fatmawati, Siti Mahmudah Noorhayati, dan Kalsum Minangsih. 2018. “Jihad Penista Agama Jihad NKRI: Antonio Gramsci’s Hegemony Theory Analysis of Radical Da’wah Phenomena in Online Media.” Al-Albab 7(2): 199–220.
  12. Fraser, Nancy. 2001. “Recognition without Ethics?” Theory, Culture & Society 18(2): 21–42.
  13. ———. 2003. “Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation.” In Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, ed. Joel Golb, James Ingram, dan Christian Wilke. London and New York: Verso, 7–109.
  14. Garrett, P. M. 2010. “Recognizing the Limitations of the Political Theory of Recognition: Axel Honneth, Nancy Fraser and Social Work.” British Journal of Social Work 40(5): 1517–33. https://academic.oup.com/bjsw/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcp044.
  15. Gramsci, Antonio. 1996. Selection from the Prison Notebooks. ed. Quintin Hoare dan Nowell Smith. India.
  16. Habermas, Jurgen. 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, Massachussets, and London: The MIT Press.
  17. ———. 1994. “Struggles for Recognition in the Democratic Constitutional State.” In Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, ed. Amy Gutmann. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 107–48.
  18. Hasbullah. 2018. “Kehidupan Keberagamaan Masyarakat Suku Akit di Desa Sonde Kabupaten Kepulauan Meranti.” Sosial Budaya 15(1): 1–10.
  19. Honneth, Axel. 1995. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  20. Honneth, Axel, dan Nancy Fraser. 2003. Redistribution or Recognition: A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso.
  21. Indiyanto, Agus. 2013. Agama di Indonesia dalam Angka: Dinamika Demografis Berdasarkan Sensus Penduduk Tahun 2000 dan 2010. Jogyakarta: CRCS Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  22. Ku, Kun-hui. 2005a. “Rights to Recognition: Minority/Indigenous Politics in the Emerging Taiwanese Nationalism.” Social Analysis 49(2): 99–121. http://berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/social-analysis/49/2/sa490206.xml.
  23. ———. 2005b. “Rights to Recognition: Minority/Indigenous Politics in the Emerging Taiwanese Nationalism.” Social Analysis 49(2): 99–121.
  24. Laegaard, Sune. 2012. “Unequal Recognition, Misrecognition and Injustice The Case of Religious Minorities in Denmark.” Ethnicities 12(2): 197–214.
  25. Leng, Chee Heng, Gavin W. Jones, dan Maznah Mohamad. 2009. “Muslim-Non-Muslim Marriage, Rights and the State in Southeast Asia.” In Muslim-Non-Muslim Marriage, Singapore: ISEAS Publishing, 1–30. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1355/9789812308221-004/html.
  26. Lukito, Ratno. 2008. “The enigma of legal pluralism in Indonesian Islam: the case of interfaith marriage.” Journal of Islamic Law and Culture 10(2): 179–91. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15288170802236457.
  27. Maarif, Samsul. 2015. “Being a Muslim in Animistic Ways.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 52(1): 149–74. http://aljamiah.or.id/index.php/AJIS/article/view/29.
  28. ———. 2018. CRCS Pasang Surut Rekognisi Agama Leluhur dalam Politik Agama di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: CRCS Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  29. Madjid, Abd, Santoso, dan M. Ridwan. 2021. “Pengalaman Beragama; Keharmonisan dan Minoritas dalam Masyarakat Suku Muslim Akit Siak Riau-Indonesia.” Al-Ulum 21(1): 222–43. http://journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/au/article/view/1924.
  30. Mayliza, Mayliza, dan Adianto Adianto. 2019. “STRATEGI PEMBERDAYAAN KOMUNITASADAT TERPENCIL (KAT) SUKU BONAI.” Jurnal Kebijakan Publik 10(1): 41–46. https://jkp.ejournal.unri.ac.id/index.php/JKP/article/view/7429.
  31. McNay, Lois. 2008. Against Recognition. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  32. Mujiburrahman. 2001. “Religious Conversion in Indonesia: The Karo Batak and the Tengger Javanese.” 12(1): 23–38.
  33. Muntaza, Muntaza. 2022. “The Interconnectedness of Indigenous Religion and Indigenous Territory: A Case Study of Talang Mamak, Riau.” Umbara 7(2): 16–26. http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/umbara/article/view/35934.
  34. Nisa, Eva F. 2018. “The Bureaucratization of Muslim Marriage in Indonesia.” Journal of Law and Religion 33(2): 291–309. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0748081418000280/type/journal_article.
  35. Phillips, Anne. 2003. “Recognition and the Struggle for Political Voice.” In Recognition Struggles and Social Movements: Contested Identities, Agency and Power, ed. Barbara Hobson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 263–73.
  36. Piromalli, Eleonora. 2015. “Authority and the Struggle for Recognition.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23(2): 205–22.
  37. Porath, Nathan. 2013. “Freud among the Orang Sakai. The Father Archetype, the Talking Cure, and the Transference in a Sumatran Shamanic Healing Complex.” Anthropos 108(1): 1–18. https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/index.php?doi=10.5771/0257-9774-2013-1-1.
  38. ———. 2018. “The Orang Batin/Orang Sakai in the Malay Kingdom of Siak Sri Indrapura.” Asian Ethnology 77(1/2): 285–306.
  39. Prasojo, Zaenuddin Hudi. 2015. “Indigenous Community, Customary Law and Multiculturalisme in Indonesia.” Al-Albab 2(1): 99–110. http://jurnaliainpontianak.or.id/index.php/alalbab/article/view/26.
  40. Rab, Tabrani. 2002. Nasib Suku Asli di Riau. Pekanbaru: Riau Cultural Institute.
  41. Reed, Jean-Pierre. 2013. “Theorist of Subaltern Subjectivity: Antonio Gramsci, Popular Beliefs, Political Passion, and Reciprocal Learning.” Critical Sociology 39(4): 561–91. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0896920512437391.
  42. Rosaliza, Mita. 2018. “Akit Tribe and Existence of Mangrove Forest in Berancah Village, Bengkalis, Indonesia.” In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, , 012060.
  43. Santoso. 2018. “Motivasi Belajar Agama Islam pada Kaum Mualaf Suku Akit Desa Penyengat Kecamatan Sungai Apit Kabupaten Siak.” Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.
  44. Santoso, Afdal, dan Putri Febriana Niko. 2019. Dinamika Konversi Agama pada Masyarakat Adat Akit. Semarang: SINT Publishing.
  45. Schweiger, Gottfried. 2019. “Recognition, misrecognition and justice.” Ethics & Global Politics 12(4): 1693870. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16544951.2019.1693870.
  46. Seo, Myengkyo. 2013. “Falling in Love and Changing Gods: Inter-religious Marriage and Religious Conversion in Java, Indonesia.” Indonesia and the Malay World 41(119): 76–96.
  47. Stark, Hannah. 2014. “Judith Butler’s Post-Hegelian Ethics and the Problem with Recognition.” Feminist Theory 15(1): 89–100.
  48. Suhasti, Ermi, Siti Djazimah, dan Hartini Hartini. 2019. “Polemics on Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia between Rules and Practices.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 56(2): 367–94. http://www.aljamiah.or.id/index.php/AJIS/article/view/56205.
  49. Suparlan, Parsudi. 1993. Orang Sakai Di Riau: Masyarakat Terasing dalam Masyarakat Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  50. Szalai, Julia. 2003. “Conflicting Struggles for Recognition: Clashing Interests of Gender and Sthnicity in Contemporary Hungary.” In Recognition Struggles and Social Movements: Contested Identities, Agency and Power, ed. Barbara Hobson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 188–212.
  51. Taylor, Charles. 1994. “The Politics of Recognition.” In Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, ed. Amy Gutmann. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 25–73.
  52. Timar, Judith, dan Eva G. Fekete. 2010. “Fighting for Recognition: Feminist Geography in East-Central Europe.” Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 17(6): 775–90.