Bilah Samping Artikel

Telah diserahkan
Aug 7, 2025
Diterima
Dec 31, 2025
Diterbitkan
Jan 12, 2026
Download
PDF (Eng) (English)
Statistic
Read Counter : 54 Download : 7

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

Isi Artikel Utama

Abstrak

Quranic narrative verses, in addition to serving as sources of spiritual, moral, and educational values, can also function as a medium for formulating legal principles. This article examines a model of interpreting Quranic narrative verses in Shajarat al-Maarif by Izz al-Din ibn Abd al-Salam. This study employs a qualitative method based on library research. The primary source of data is Shajarat al-Maarif, while secondary sources include classical Quranic commentaries, books, and scholarly articles relevant to the topic. The collected data are analyzed using content analysis techniques. The findings reveal that Ibn Abd al-Salam interprets Quranic narrative verses through a fil–jawab–natijah model, which is integrated with elements of Sufism, maqasid al-shariah, and usul al-fiqh in the process of deriving legal principles. Through this model, every human action (fil) is evaluated based on God’s response (jawab), which subsequently generates normative consequences (natijah) that can be generalized into legal maxims. From the narratives of the prophets—such as Prophet Yusuf, Musa, and Ibrahim—and the figure of Qarun, Ibn Abd al-Salam extracts legal principles including non-formal evidentiary procedures, the prioritization of public interest (maslahah), and prophetic ethics in the implementation of legal obligations (taklif). From the story of Qarun, he further emphasizes the importance of wealth redistribution, anti-greed ethics, and policies of economic justice. This study concludes that the fil–jawab–natijah model proposed by Ibn Abd al-Salam enriches the discourse of legal interpretation of Quranic narrative verses by offering an integrative and contextual approach.

Kata Kunci

Fil–jawab–natijah Quranic Narratives Legal Interpretation Shajarat al-Maarif

Rincian Artikel

##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##
##submission.howToCite##
Arifin, M. Z., Bahrul Hikam, A., & Nurkholis. (2026). FIL–JAWAB–NATIJAH AS AN ALTERNATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR LEGAL INTERPRETATION OF QURANIC NARRATIVE VERSES: THE PERSPECTIVE OF IZZ AL-DIN IBN ABD AL-SALAM. Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an Dan Tafsir , 10(2), 272-296. https://doi.org/10.32505/at-tibyan.v10i2.12389

References

  1. Abidin, Ahmad Zainal. “Narratives as a Source of Law in the Quran: A Reappraisal.” Al-Jamiah: Journal of Islamic Studies 51, no. 2 (2013): 323–344. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2013.512.323-344.
  2. Asyur, Muhammad ath-Thahir ibn. Tafsir At-Tahrir wa at-Tanwir. Beirut: Dar Shuhnun, 2013.
  3. Auda, Jasser. Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. London: IIIT, 2008.
  4. Abdussalam, Izzuddin ibn. Syajarat al-Maarif wa al-Ahwal wa Shalih al-Aqwal wa al-Amal. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiah, 2012.
  5. Abdussalam, Izzuddin ibn. Qawaid al-Ahkam fi Masalih al-Anam. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiah, 2013.
  6. Al-Qurthubi, Muhammad ibn Ahmad ibn Abi Bakr ibn Faraj al-Anshari. Al-Jami li Ahkam al-Quran, Jilid 6. Beirut: Muassasah al-Thibaah wa al-Nashr Wazarah al-Tsaqafah wa al-Irsyad al-Islami, 2013.
  7. Asyari, Niken Diani Pangestika. “Pembentukan Karakter Sosial Melalui Kisah dalam Al-Quran.” ASANKA: Journal of Social Science and Education 3, no. 2 (2022): 288–300. https://doi.org/10.21154/asanka.v3i2.4278.
  8. Al-Qaradawi, Yusuf. Kaifa Nataamalu Maa al-Quran al-Karim. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 2012.
  9. Ar-Razi, Fakhrudin. Mafatih al-Ghaib. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turats al-Arabi, t.t.
  10. Arikunto, Suharsimi. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Edisi revisi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2014.
  11. Az-Zuhayli, Wahbah. Ushul al-Fiqh al-Islami, Jilid 2. Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr, 2005.
  12. Ariani, Dina, dan Sutrisno Hadi. “The Wisdom of Legal Sharia (Tasyri) on the Aspect of Criminal Verse: Hasbi Ash Shiddieqy Thought Studies.” Shautuna 5, no. 1 (2024): 55–71. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v5i1.37048.
  13. Baihaqi, Yusuf. “Dimensi Ekonomi dalam Kisah Al-Quran.” Asas 9, no. 1 (2017): 64–74. https://doi.org/10.24042/asas.v9i1.1214.
  14. Haidaroh, Milhatina Umi, et al. “Analisis Karakter Qarun dalam QS Al-Qasas Ayat 76–83 Perspektif Tafsir Maqasidi.” At-Taisir: Journal of Indonesian Tafsir Studies 6, no. 1 (2025): 29–42.
  15. Hamka. Tafsir Al-Azhar. Singapura: Pustaka Nasional Pte Ltd, 1993.
  16. Katsir, Abu al-Fida Ismail ibn. Tafsir Al-Quran Al-Azhim, Jilid 7. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
  17. Karimullah, Suud Sarim. “From Divine Revelation to Legal Practice: Contextualizing Islamic Law in the Contemporary Era.” Al-Syirah: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum 59, no. 1 (2025): 36–47. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v59i1.1336.
  18. Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. Shariah Law: An Introduction. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2008.
  19. Maidawa, Ibrahim, et al. “The Contributions of Al-Shatibi, Izzuddin Ibn Abdul Salam, and Ibn Ashur on Maqasid al-Shariah: An Exploration.” Jurnal Usuluddin 52, no. 1 (2024): 135–148. https://doi.org/10.22452/usuluddin.vol52no1.6.
  20. Moleong, Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2022.
  21. Mahfudz, Ali. “Tafsir Ahkam terhadap Kisah Al-Quran dalam Kitab Syajaratu al-Maarif Karya Izzuddin Abdussalam.” El-Furqania 10, no. 2 (2024): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.54625/elfurqania.v10i02.7534.
  22. Mustaqim, Abdul. Argumentasi Keniscayaan Tafsir Maqasidi sebagai Basis Moderasi Islam. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Ulumul Quran, UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2019.
  23. Mubarrak, Zahrul, dan Misbar Arna. “Maslahah Menurut Izzuddin Abd al-Salam.” Al-Nadhair: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner 1, no. 2 (2022): 123–140. https://doi.org/10.61433/alnadhair.v1i2.19.
  24. Nugroho, Irzak Yuliardy, dan Tutik Hamidah. “Konsep Maslahah Perspektif Izzuddin Ibn Abd Salam.” Ulumuna: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 7, no. 2 (2021): 261–277. https://doi.org/10.36420/ju.v7i2.4805.
  25. Nur, Iffatin, Syahrul Adam, dan M. Ngizzul Muttaqin. “Maqasid al-Shariah: The Main Reference and Ethical-Spiritual Foundation for the Dynamization Process of Islamic Law.” Ahkam 20, no. 2 (2020): 331–360. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v20i2.18333.
  26. Quthub, Sayid. Tafsir Fi Zhilal al-Quran. Jakarta: Robbani Press, 2004.
  27. Rahman, Fazlur. Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.
  28. Rohman, Fatku, dan Muhamad Uyun. “Mengeksplorasi Peran Kisah-Kisah Al-Quran dalam Pengembangan Moral Anak.” MAGHZA: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Quran dan Tafsir 9, no. 1 (2024): 60–74. https://doi.org/10.24090/maghza.v9i1.9803.
  29. Rokim, S., R. Maya, dan A. Zakaria. “Analisis Nilai Pendidikan Keluarga dalam Kisah Nabi Yusuf di Al-Quran.” Edukasi Islam: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 12, no. 1 (2023): 119–140. https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v12i001.5320.
  30. Ridla, Moh Halir, dan Ah. Fawaid. “Kisah Qarun dalam Al-Quran: Perspektif Maqasid Al-Quran Yusuf Al-Qaradawi.” REVELATIA: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Quran dan Tafsir 3, no. 1 (2022): 83–103. https://doi.org/10.19105/revelatia.v3i1.6320.
  31. Saleh, Fauzi. “The Role of Quranic Interpretation in Islamic Legal Reasoning.” Jurnal Ilmiah Al Muashirah 21, no. 2 (2024): 270–282. https://doi.org/10.22373/jim.v21i2.25693.
  32. Shihab, M. Quraish. Tafsir Al-Mishbah: Pesan, Kesan, dan Keserasian Al-Quran, Vol. 15. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2012.
  33. Surayya, Aya, dan Mulizar. “Hedonisme pada Kisah Qarun Perspektif Semiotika Roland Barthes.” Al-Fawatih: Jurnal Kajian Al-Quran dan Hadis 4, no. 2 (2023): 232–252. https://doi.org/10.24952/alfawatih.v4i2.9545.
  34. Wahyuni, Fatimah Sri, dan Kusumawati. “Nilai-Nilai Moral pada Kisah Nabi Yusuf dalam Al-Quran.” Jurnal Kajian Agama Hukum dan Pendidikan Islam (KAHPI) 5, no. 1 (2023): 76–90. https://doi.org/10.32493/kahpi.v5i1.36584.
  35. Yusuf, Baihaqi. “Al-Tasyri al-Qurani: Baina al-Ijaz wa Dalil Mashdarihi al-Rabbani.” Al-Adalah 12, no. 2 (2014): 451–460. https://doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v12i2.198.
  36. Zahrah, Muhammad Abu. Ushul al-Fiqh. Kairo: Dar al-Fikr al-Arabi, 2016.