Main Article Content

Abstract

The study of love in the Qur'an has predominantly focused on its psychological dimension, viewing it as a manifestation of human emotions. However, the Qur'an places love in a broader context, emphasizing the centrality of God and transcending conventional subject-object relationships. Notably, the verses addressing love in the Qur'an often overlook its multifaceted dimensions. The contemporary discourse on reinterpreting religion through the lens of love underscores the need to comprehend the implications of love's interpretation in exegesis books. Grounded in this context, this research aims to unravel the dimensions and implications of love's meaning in MakÄrim ShÄ«rÄzÄ«'s exegesis, al-Amthal. Employing an interpretative approach, the findings reveal four dimensions proposed by MakÄrim ShÄ«rÄzÄ«: firstly, a philosophical dimension rooted in the dichotomy of genuine and illusory love; secondly, a religious dimension positioning love as the “substance of religionâ€; thirdly, a social dimension where love forms the basis for tranquility (iá¹­mi‘nÄn) and societal peace (sakan); and finally, a psychological dimension portraying love as an emotion existing alongside hatred. These dimensions bear implications for issues related to divinity, prophethood, social relations, and tolerance. This research contributes to refining the interpretation of love in Islam, fostering a nuanced understanding that transcends exclusive and extreme religious perspectives.

Keywords

Al-Amthal fī Tafsīr al-Qur’an Love Nāṣir Makārim al-Shīrāzī

Article Details

How to Cite
Maria Ulfah, L., Baihaki, E. S., Gama, C. B., & Fadel, A. (2024). LOVE IN THE QUR’AN: EXPLORING MULTIFACETED DIMENSIONS THROUGH THE ANALYTICAL LENS OF MAKÄ€RIM SHĪRÄ€ZĪ’S TAFSĪR AL-AMTHAL. Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an Dan Tafsir , 9(1), 36-56. Retrieved from http://journal.iainlangsa.ac.id/index.php/tibyan/article/view/8124

References

  1. Ahmed, Ala B., and Meram S. S. Mohamad. “A Philosophical View on Love and the Concept of Soulmates in Paulo Coelho’s Brida.” Cihan University-Erbil Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 8, no. 1 (April 30, 2024): 98–102. https://doi.org/10.24086/cuejhss.v8n1y2024.pp98-102.
  2. Akbar, Ali. “Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd:” In Contemporary Perspectives on Revelation and Qu’ranic Hermeneutics, 127–60. An Analysis of Four Discourses. Edinburgh University Press, 2020.
  3. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctv2f4vppq.10.
  4. ‘Ali, Khamis ‘Abdullah. “Al-Ḥub fī al-Qur’ān al-Karīm Dilālātuhu wa Siyāqatuhu.” Al-Adab Journal, no. 82 (January 14, 2022): 36–72. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v0i82.3302.
  5. Amrulloh, Ahmad Yasir, and Fathoni Arifandi. “Ma’na al-Hub Fi Kitaab al-Hub Fi al-Qur’an al-Karim Bi Qalam M. Said Ramadhan al-Buthi Istinadan Ila al-Mandzur al-Siimiiya’iy Li Roman Jakobson.” Afshaha: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Arab 1, no. 2 (November 24, 2022): 124–36. https://doi.org/10.18860/afshaha.v1i2.17606.
  6. Anderson, Pamela Sue, and Paul S. Fiddes. “Creating a New Imaginary for Love in Religion.” Angelaki 25, no. 1–2 (March 3, 2020): 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2020.1717772.
  7. ‘Arabī, Muḥammad bin ‘Alī Ibn. Raḥmah min al-Raḥmān fī Tafsīr wa Ishārāt al-Qur’ān. Vol. 1 (Damaskus: Maṭba‘ah al-Nadr, 1410).
  8. ———. Tafsīr Ibn ‘Arabī/Ta’wīlāt ‘Abd al-Razzāq. Vol. 1 (Beirūt: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī, 1422).
  9. Azdajic, Dejan. “Longing for the Transcendent: The Role of Love in Islamic Mysticism with Special Reference to al-Ghazālī and Ibn al-ʿArabī.” Transformation 33, no. 2 (April 1, 2016): 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265378815595237.
  10. Bagawī, Ḥusayn ibn Mas‘ūd al-. Ma‘ālim al-Tanzīl. Vol. 1 (Beirūt: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī, 1460).
  11. Bagir, Haidar. Islam Risalah Cinta dan Kebahagiaan. Jakarta: Noura Books, 2019.
  12. ———. Islam, the Faith of Love and Happiness. UK: Kube Publishing Limited, 2017.
  13. ———. Manifesto Islam Cinta. Bandung: Mizan Pustaka, 2022.
  14. ———. Semesta Cinta. Jakarta: Noura Books, 2015.
  15. Dawkins, Richard. The God Delusion. London: Bantam Press, 2006.
  16. Dennett, Daniel C. Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. UK: Penguin, 2007.
  17. Djuned, Muslim. “Lafaz Al-Hubb dalam Al-Qur’an menurut Al-Buthi.” TAFSE: Journal of Qur’anic Studies 8, no. 1 (June 30, 2023): 104–22. https://doi.org/10.22373/tafse.v8i1.18369.
  18. Fawaid, Muhammad. “Islam Agama Cinta Perspektif Husein Ja’far Al-Haddar.” Skripsi, UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq, 2023. http://digilib.uinkhas.ac.id/17672/.
  19. Harris, Sam. The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason. New York City: W.W. Norton & Company, 2004.
  20. Hasan, Abu. “Konsep Cinta Kepada Allah dalam Al-Quran: Telaah Atas Pemikiran Al-Alusi dalam Tafsir Ruhul Ma’ani Q.S Al-Imran 31.” Skripsi, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, 2016. http://digilib.uinsa.ac.id/5713/.
  21. Hitchens, Christopher. God Is Not Great. London: Atlantic Books Ltd, 2011.
  22. Ḥusayn, Daad Younis, and Dhu al-Adhān bin ‘Abd al-Ḥalīm. “Al-Furūq al-Dalāliyyah li Kalimayat al-Ḥub wa al-Wudd wa Istiqāqātihimā fi al-Qur’ān.” Majalah Ibhāth Kuliyyah al-Tarbiyyah al-Asāsiyyah 17, no. 2 (July 1, 2021): 487–506. https://doi.org/10.33899/berj.2021.168507.
  23. Husna, Nihayatul, and Aniqoh Aniqoh. “Konsep Al-Ḥubb Al-Ilāhi Perspektif Ibn ‘Arabī; Tafsir Esoteris Ayat-Ayat Ḥubb dalam Kitab Al-Futūḥāt Al-Makkiyyah.” Jurnal Al-Mubarak: Jurnal Kajian Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir 6, no. 2 (December 30, 2021): 202–20. https://doi.org/10.47435/al-mubarak.v6i2.743.
  24. Ilmy, Muhammad Irfan. “Konsep Cinta dalam Alquran dan Implikasinya Terhadap Pendidikan Islam.” Skripsi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 2017. http://repository.upi.edu.
  25. Iyyāzī, Muḥammad ‘Alī. Al-Mufassirūn Ḥayātuhum wa Manhajuhum (Tehrān: Wizārat Farhang wa Irshād Islāmī, 1386).
  26. Jawziyyah, Muḥammad ibn Abū Bakr ibn Ayyūb ibn Qayyim al-. Rawḍah al-Muḥibbīn wa Nuzhat al-Mushtāqīn (Beirūt: Dār `Aṭā‘at al-‘Ilm, 2019).
  27. Khalishah, Nailatul, and Imam Kanafi. “The Concept of Love (Mahabbah) in Al-Qur’an Suphistic Perspective of Interpretation (Comparison of Tafsir Ibn Arabi with Tafsir Al-Jailani).” International Conference on Islamic Studies (ICIS), August 5, 2023, 388–407.
  28. Khamid, Abdul. “Epistemologi Tafsir Al-Amthal Fiy Tafsir Kitab Allah al-Munzal Karya Nasir Makarim al-Shirazi: Kajian Atas Pemikiran Nasir Makarim al-Shirazi Tentang Konsep Tuhan.” Thesis, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, 2020. http://digilib.uinsa.ac.id/45307/.
  29. Kronqvist, Camilla. “‘Speak to Us of Love’: Some Difficulties in the Philosophical and Scientific Study of Love.” In Moral Foundations of Philosophy of Mind, edited by Joel Backström, Hannes Nykänen, Niklas Toivakainen, and Thomas Wallgren, 203–27. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18492-6_8.
  30. Labib, Hakki Akmal. “The Concept of Transcendental Love in the Tafsīr Al-Qurān Al-Aẓīm By At-Tusturiy.” Teosofia: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Mysticism 7, no. 1 (June 28, 2018): 36–52. https://doi.org/10.21580/tos.v1i1.4351.
  31. Latif, Muhammad. “Konsep Cinta ‘Al Hubb’ Menurut M. Quraish Shihab dan M. Said Ramadhan Al Buthi.” Skripsi, IAIN Salatiga, 2019. http://e-repository.perpus.iainsalatiga.ac.id.
  32. Lazulfa, Haiyin Lana, and Ahmad Munir. “Sufistik Cinta Dalam Al-Qur’an: Kajian Semantik.” Jurnal Riset Agama 2, no. 2 (2022): 632–41.
  33. Maybudī, Muḥammad Fākir. Qawā‘id al-Tafsīr Lada al-Shī‘ah wa al-Sunnah (Qom: Markaz al-Taḥqīqāt wa al-Dirāsat al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2007).
  34. Musavi, Seyyed Abo Al-Hasan, Mojgan Sarshar, and Seyyed Mohammad Ayazi. “The Concept of Love in the New Testament and the Qur’an.” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 7, no. 1 (January 20, 2020): 234–46. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i1.1307.
  35. Muthahhari, Murtadha. Al-Fithrah. Jakarta: Lentera, 2008.
  36. Naar, Hichem. “A Dispositional Theory of Love.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94, no. 3 (September 1, 2013): 342–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12003.
  37. Nasrullah, Mohammad. “Konsep Cinta Ilahi dalam al Quran: Studi Kitab Tafsir Rahmah Min Al Rahman Karya dari Ibn Arabi.” Thesis, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, 2022. http://digilib.uinsa.ac.id/56717/.
  38. Nurpadilah, Nurpadilah. “Konsep Cinta Kepada Allah dalam Al-Qur’an (Study Komparatif Antara Tafsir al-Kassyaf dan Tafsir Ruuh Al-Ma’ani).” Skripsi, UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, 2020. https://repository.uin-suska.ac.id/29672/.
  39. Putra, Aditya Firmansyach. “Aplikasi Teori Anti-Sinonimitas Terhadap Makna Cinta Dunia Dalam Tafsir Al-Misbah.” Skripsi, UIN Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda., 2023. http://repository.uinsi.ac.id/handle/123456789/3802.
  40. Qushayrī, ‘Abd al-Karīm ibn Hawāzin al-. Laṭā’if al-Ishārāt. Vol. 1 (Kairo: al-Hayah al-‘Ammah al-Miṣriyyah li al-Kitāb, 1420).
  41. Rāzī, Muḥammad ibn ‘Umar al-Fakhr al-. Mafātiḥ al-Ghayb. Vol. 4 (Beirūt: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī, 1460).
  42. Royana, Agam, and Muhammad Labibuddin. “Konsep Cinta dalam Tafsir Quran.” Sophist: Jurnal Sosial Politik Kajian Islam dan Tafsir 4, no. 2 (2022): 197–224. https://doi.org/10.20414/sophist.v4i2.67.
  43. Samud, Samud. “Konsep Mahabah dalam Perspektif Tafsir Maudhu’i.” Diya Al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi al-Quran dan al-Hadis 5, no. 01 (June 1, 2017): 93–108. https://doi.org/10.24235/diyaafkar.v5i01.4334.
  44. Shīrāzī, Nāṣir Makārim al-. Al-Amthal fī Tafsīr Kitābillah al-Munzal. Vol. 1 (Qom: Madrasah al-Imām ‘Alī ibn Abī Ṭālib, 1461).
  45. Sukidi. “Naṣr Ḥāmid Abū Zayd and the Quest for a Humanistic Hermeneutics of the Qur’ān.” Die Welt Des Islams 49, no. 2 (2009): 181–211.
  46. Zaenulloh, Muhammad Rizal. “Makna kata Al-Hubb dan Al-Mawaddah dalam Al-Qur’an: Studi Analisis Semantik tentang Kata Al-Hubb dan Al Mawaddah dalam Al-Qur’an Serta Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan yang Terkandung di Dalamnya.” Skripsi, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, 2018. https://digilib.uinsgd.ac.id/10547/.
  47. Zaid, Nasr Hamid Abu. Tekstualitas Al-Qur’an; Kritik terhadap Ulumul Qur’an. Yogyakarta: LKIS Pelangi Aksara, 2002.
  48. Zamakhsharī, Maḥmūd bin ‘Umar al-. Al-Kashshāf ‘an Ḥaqā’iq Ghawāmiḍ al-Tanzīl wa ‘Uyūn al-Aqāwīl fī Wujūh al-Ta’wīl. Vol. 1 (Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī, 1407).
  49. Zayd, Nasr Hamid Abu. Critique of Religious Discourse. London: Yale University Press, 2018.