Article Sidebar

Submitted
Feb 14, 2025
Accepted
May 18, 2025
Published
May 18, 2025
Download
Pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 43 Download : 2

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Maintaining harmony within the marital environment is essential for the stability of any household. However, over time, various challenges may arise that can lead to divorce. This study aims to examine the strategies employed in electronic mediation for divorce cases at the Probolinggo City Religious Court, with particular attention to the implementation of PERMA No. 1 of 2016, and to analyze these practices from the perspective of Maq??id Al-Syar?ah. Employing a qualitative research method, this study was conducted at the Probolinggo City Religious Court, where electronic mediation has been implemented either fully or partially online, in line with PERMA No. 1 of 2016 Article 6(2), before the issuance of PERMA No. 3 of 2022. The findings reveal that the success of electronic mediation heavily relies on the active participation and cooperation of the involved parties. Legally, the study identifies the need for more detailed regulations to standardize mediation procedures. Socially, while access to justice has improved, challenges remain due to low public trust. Institutionally, enhancing mediators’ competencies and upgrading technological infrastructure are imperative. Electronic mediation increases the efficiency of Islamic justice; however, clear legal provisions are necessary to ensure its validity. Although this method offers flexibility, it may diminish the emotional dimension crucial to reconciliation. Psychologically, it reduces the pressure on parties but may impair effective communication. Therefore, the implementation of electronic mediation must balance legal, social, and psychological considerations. Full commitment from all parties is essential to avoid negative outcomes. The mediator’s role as facilitator and intermediary—not decision-maker—requires strong collaboration to achieve desired resolutions. Furthermore, the principles of Maq??id Al-Syar?ah align with contemporary practices, emphasizing community welfare and solutions that conform to Sharia values.

Keywords

Divorce Cases Electronic Mediation Maq??id Al-Syar?ah Religious Court

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

An author who publishes in At-Tafkir agrees to the following terms:
  • Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
  • Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (eg post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (ex in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
How to Cite
Fathony, A., & Auliah, U. H. (2025). Electronic Mediation in Divorce Cases at the Religious Court of Probolinggo City from the Perspective of Maqasid Al-Syariah. At-Tafkir, 18(1), 212-132. https://doi.org/10.32505/at.v18i1.10946

References

  1. Anjani, R., & Setiadi, E. (2023). Disparitas Putusan Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Dilakukan oleh Kepala Desa (Studi Putusan Nomor 06/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2022/PN.Bdg dan Studi Putusan Nomor 06/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2021/PN.Plg). Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsls.v3i1.4917
  2. Ardiansyah, A., & Nurjannah, N. (2022). Upaya hakim mediator dalam mengoptimalkan mediasi sebagai penyelesaian perkara perceraian di pengadilan agama majene. Qisthosia?: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 3(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.46870/jhki.v3i2.385
  3. Ari Wijaya, S., & Shihab, A. (2022). Dasar Hukum Dan Peran BKPSDM Dalam Pelaksanaan Proses Mediasi Kasus Perceraian PNS Di Kabupaten Lombok Timur Tahun 2021. Jurnal Mentari Publika, 2(2), 246–255.
  4. Asfahani, A. M. (2023). The Relationship Between Academic Self-Efficacy and Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions of Electronic Assessment: A Mediation Analysis. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(6), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.6.13
  5. Bastomi, A., & Paramita, P. P. (2021). Penyelesaian Sengketa Perceraian Melalui Mediasi Program Pusaka Sakinah. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kenotariatan, 5(3), 490–500.
  6. Hamzah, E., Hasmulyadi, H., & Amirullah, A. (2022). Peran Hakim Mediator dalam Menangani Mediasi Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama. KALOSARA: Family Law Review, 1(2), 277. https://doi.org/10.31332/.v1i2.3283
  7. Hanif, H. A., & Ulya, N. H. (2023). Mediasi Sebagai Metode Penyelesaian Sengketa Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Slawi. Jcrs (Journal of Community Research and Service), 7(1), 131–137.
  8. Hidayati Afsari, N., & Andini, I. (2019). Proses mediasi dalam mencegah terjadinya perceraian di pengadilan agama. Iktisyaf: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah Dan Tasawuf, 1(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.53401/iktsf.v1i1.7
  9. Izzah, N. I., & Pradikta, H. Y. (2022). Mediasi Virtual Dalam Perkara Perceraian Perspektif Maslahah. El-Izdiwaj: Indonesian Journal of Civil and Islamic Family Law, 3(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.24042/el-izdiwaj.v3i1.12118
  10. Jiwantara, F. A., Hasanah, S., & Lukman, L. (2023). Penyuluhan Hukum Tentang Sistem E-Court Dalam Pelaksanaan Peradilan Di Indonesia (Di Sekretariat Kantor Dpc Peradi Mataram-Ntb Bersama Calon Advokat Peradi). EJOIN?: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(4), 244–251. https://doi.org/10.55681/ejoin.v1i4.736
  11. Lidinillah, A. M., & Aufa, M. N. (2023). Mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa perceraian alasan syiqaq. Hakam: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Ekonomi Islam, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.33650/jhi.v7i1.6066
  12. Made Emy Andayani Citra, I. K. G. P. S. (2021). Efektivitas Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Negeri Amlapura. Jurnal Hukum Mahasiswa, 1(1), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.36733/jhm.v1i1.2593
  13. Mahkamah Agung RI. PERMA NO. 3 Tahun 2022 Tentang Mediasi di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik. , Mahkamah Agung RI § (2022).
  14. Ningtyas, D. P. A. (2021). Domestic Violence Screening sebagai peningkatan implementasi mediasi perceraian berdasarkan peta KDRT pada kultur masyarakat Jawa Timur. Sakina: Journal of Family Studies, 5(2), 25–50.
  15. Paryadi, P. (2021). Mediasi Di BP4 Dalam Mencegah Perceraian. Ulumul Syar’i?: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah, 10(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.52051/ulumulsyari.v10i1.119
  16. Putra, T. P., Hasan, Y. A., & Makkawaru, Z. (2023). Analisis hukum pelaksanaan mediasi perceraian di pengadilan agama sengkang. Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, 5(2), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v5i2.2609
  17. PutraAdi, K. (2022). Implementasi Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Mediasi Dalam Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Selong. JURIDICA?: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani, 3(2), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.46601/juridica.v3i2.203
  18. Rizqi, M. (2022). Efektivitas Mediasi Dalam Kasus Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Jepara. Isti`dal?: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam, 9(2), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.34001/ijshi.v9i2.3995
  19. Salamah, Y. Y. (2013). Urgensi Mediasi dalam Perkara Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama. AHKAM?: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v13i1.953
  20. Sartika, A., Sultan, L., & Fatmawati, F. (2023). Problematika Mediasi pada Kasus Perceraian karena Adanya Pihak Ketiga di Pengadilan Agama Enrekang Perspektif Hukum Islam. Qadauna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Keluarga Islam, 4(2), 616–631.
  21. Simatupang, I. T. S., Siregar, I., & Harahap, I. (2023). Pengetahuan Peran Mediator Dalam Proses Mediasi Perkara Perceraian. Wahana Didaktika?: Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan, 22(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.31851/wahanadidaktika.v22i1.12925
  22. Sunarsi, D., Yuherman, Y., & Sumiyati, S. (2018). Efektifitas Peran Mediator Non Hakim Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1a Pulau Jawa. JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA BHAKTI, 2(2), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.32501/jhmb.v2i2.32
  23. SUTIYOSO, B. (2023). Implementation of Mediation As Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) in Civil Jurisdiction. International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science, 4(1), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v4i1.487
  24. Zaidah, Y., & Normas, M. R. (2022). Mediasi Online Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Era Pandemi. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AND LAW STUDIES, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.18592/jils.v5i3.5847