Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jun 25, 2025
Accepted
Dec 11, 2025
Published
Dec 12, 2025
Download
Pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 4 Download : 2

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Intergenerational interaction is an increasingly important factor shaping the functioning and adaptability of public organizations. In bureaucratic environments, these interactions become more complex due to differences in values, authority orientations, work styles, and technological familiarity across generations. While prior research has largely focused on generational dynamics in private-sector organizations, limited empirical evidence explains how these dynamics operate within public bureaucracies in Aceh Province, where hierarchical norms and administrative cultures differ significantly. This study examines how intergenerational interaction is constructed within the Pidie District Government and how it influences organizational effectiveness and public service delivery. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected through interviews, participant observations, and analysis of internal regulations across several government agencies. The findings reveal three dominant patterns: technological competency gaps that disrupt task coordination, varying interpretations of bureaucratic hierarchy that affect communication flow, and contrasting work-style orientations that shape teamwork and conflict emergence. These patterns often lead to recurring misunderstandings and reduced workflow efficiency. However, adaptive leadership, structured knowledge-sharing routines, and informal mentoring between generations were found to effectively minimize barriers. The study contributes to public administration literature by highlighting how generational identities intersect with bureaucratic norms. Practically, the results emphasize the need for targeted digital literacy initiatives, clearer internal communication guidelines, and institutionalized cross-generational mentoring to enhance organizational cohesion and improve service delivery.

Keywords

Cross-generational Communication Generational Dynamics Public bureaucracies

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

An author who publishes in At-Tafkir agrees to the following terms:
  • Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
  • Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (eg post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (ex in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
Author Biography

Munawar, Universitas Abulyatama Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Master Student of Universitas Abulyatama Banda Aceh

How to Cite
Usman, R., Sazali, H., & Djamil, M. (2025). Cross-Generational Communication in Public Service Delivery. At-Tafkir, 18(1), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.32505/at.v18i1.11895

References

  1. Bayu, M. (2025). Perbedaan Gaya Komunikasi Antar Generasi: Tinjauan Teoritis Tentang Interaksi Gen Z dan Baby Boomers Dalam Konteks Sosial Dan Profesional. Governance: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Politik Lokal dan Pembangunan, 11(4), 165-174.
  2. Budyatna, M., LM Ganiem. (2011) Teori Komunikasi Antarpribadi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  3. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  4. Setiawan, D. 2017. Dampak Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Terhadap Budaya (Impact of Information Technology Development and Communication on). Jurnal Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/146250
  5. DeVito, Josep A. (1997) Komunikasi antar manusia. Jakarta: Profesional Books, 1997, ed 5.
  6. Hermansyah, A. (2022, January). Teacher communication strategy in economic learning with hybrid learning method in senior high school. In 2nd UIN Imam Bonjol International Conference on Islamic Education (pp. 157-164). Redwhite Press.
  7. Husamah, H. (2024). LITERASI Urgensi dan Peran dalam Mewujudkan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Pendidikan Profesi Guru.
  8. Iskandar, D. (2021). Strategi komunikasi organisasi dalam membangun loyalitas kerja pegawai. Persepsi: Communication Journal, 4(1), 31-42.
  9. Jannah, M., Ritonga, N. D. A., & Farhan, M. (2024). Tantangan komunikasi antar-generasi dalam lingkungan kerja organisasi modern. SABER: Jurnal Teknik Informatika, Sains dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(1), 70-81.
  10. Kartini, S., & MR, A. S. M., Mubina, F., Syahputra, R., & Agni, M. (2024). Dinamika Komunikasi Antar Pribadi dalam Era Digital. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(1), 1125-1130.
  11. Khizanatul (2024) Dinamika Komunikasi Generasi Z dengan Idola di Platform TikTok.
  12. Mailin, M., Rambe, G., Ar-Ridho, A., & Candra, C. (2022). Teori media/teori difusi inovasi. Jurnal Guru Kita, 6(2), 168-168.
  13. Medina, Azizah. The Effect of Technology Progress on Communication Patterns of Umm Students https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/jsn
  14. Mulyana, D., Solatun. (2008). Metode Penelitian Komunikasi: Contoh-contoh Penelitian Kualitatif dengan Pendekatan Praktis. Bandung: Rosda.
  15. Musfikar, R. (2018). Kendala dalam implementasi E-government pada pemerintah kabupaten pidie. Cyberspace: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi, 2(1), 48-58.
  16. Mustafa, T., Purnama, E., & Syahbandir, M. (2016). Penggunaan Diskresi Oleh Pejabat Pemerintah Untuk Kelancaran Penyelenggaraanpemerintahan Daerah (Suatu Penelitian di Kabupaten Pidie). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2).
  17. Oktaviana, S. A. (2024). Implementasi Program Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS) Oleh Dinas Sosial Kota Banda Aceh Dalam Mengurangi Kemiskinan (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh).
  18. Radiana, I. (2025) (Book) Bridging the Gap: Menjembatani Komunikasi Antar Generasi di Tempat Kerja. Penerbit Adab.
  19. Rakhmat, J., (1999). Psikologi komunikasi. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  20. Saputra, E. W. H. U., Indrawati, M., & Utari, W. (2021). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan, Komunikasi Dan Pemberian Reward Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Badan Koordinasi Wilayah II Bojonegoro Pemprov Jatim Melalui Motivasi Kerja. Journal of Applied Management and Accounting Science, 2(2), 104-115.
  21. Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
  22. Syarifah, F. N. U., Cahyana, N. I., & Chaniago, H. (2025). Gaya Komunikasi Generasi Z: Pengaruhnya di Lingkungan Kantor. Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 5(1), 9-9.
  23. Wardani, A. K., & Sufyanto, S. (2024). Bridging the Generation Gap: Communication Strategies at Golkar Sidoarjo DPD. Indonesian Journal of Cultural and Community Development, 15(3), 10-21070.
  24. Williams, K. C., Page, R. A., Petrosky, A. R., & Hernandez, E. H. (2012). Multi-generational marketing: Descriptions, characteristics, lifestyles, and attitudes. The Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 11(2), 21–36.