Main Article Content
Abstract
In this study, the author explains how the relationship between science and religion from a fiqh expert, philosopher, and Sufi, namely Imam Al-Ghazali, is of course very important to study. The urgency or purpose of this discussion is to study the division of knowledge according to Al-Ghazali and see the spiritual development of an Imam Al-Ghazali. This paper is expected to make it easier for readers related to science and religion according to Imam Al-Ghazali and a bridge to understand the relationship between science, knowledge and religion according to Imam Al-Ghazali. The research used in this study is a literature study (liberary research) with a descriptive qualitative approach. The result of this discussion is that al-Ghazali's spiritual development is divided into three, namely before uzlah, during uzlah, and after uzlah. In his thinking al-Ghazali did not distinguish between knowledge and knowledge, both are the same. Therefore, al-Ghazali's concept is personal that the relationship between creator and creature is never united, only the closeness of creature and creator through piety. Al-Ghazali's religion and science are both objects that can be studied or studied and do not conflict with each other.
Keywords
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (eg post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (ex in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
References
- Al-Ghazali, Imam. 2016. Tahafut Al-Falasifah, Terj. Ahmad Maimun. Bandung: Marja.
- Aziz, Safrudin. 2015. Pemikiran Pendidikan Islam, Kajian Tokoh Klasik dan Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Kalimedia.
- Khaeruman, Badri. 2004. Otentitas Hadis : Studi Kritis atas Kajian Hadis Kontemporer. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
- Maftukhin. 2012. Filsafat Islam. Yogyakarta: Teras.
- Mubarok, Muhammad Fadhlulloh. 2020. “Ilmu Dalam Perspektif Imam Al-Ghazali.†Kontemplasi: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 08, No. 01.
- Mustaqim. 1999. Pemikiran Pendidikan Islam: Kajian Tokoh Klasik dan Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
- Nata, Abuddin. 1995. Ilmu Kalam, Filsafat, dan Tasawuf. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
- Othman, Ali Issa. 1981. Manusia Menurut Al-Ghazali. Bandung: Pustaka.
- Putra, Ary Antony. 2016. “Konsep Pendidikan Agama Islam Perspektif Imam Al-Ghazali.†Al-Thariqah Vol. 1, No. 1.
- Samrin. 2013. “Konsep Ilmu Pengetahuan Menurut al-Ghazali Analisis Epistimologi Islam†Vol.6, No. 2 (November).
- Sayyed Hossein dan Oliver Leaman. 2003. Ensiklopedi Tematis Filsafat Islam. Bandung: Mizan Media Utama.
- Siswomihardjo, Koentowibisono. t.t. Siswomihardjo (tim editor), Filsafat Ilmu, (Klaten : Intan Pariwara, 1997), hlm. 85.
- Syamsul Kurniawan dan Erwin Mahrus. 2013. Jejak Pemikiran Tokoh Pendidikan Islam. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
- Wesilah. 2009. “Konsep Ilmu dan kebenaran dalam pemikiran Al-Ghazali (kajian Tentang Epistimologi).†Yogyakarta: UIN Sunan Kalijaga.