Article Sidebar

Submitted
Nov 19, 2023
Published
Dec 1, 2023
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 225 Download : 92

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Despite the image of traditional-moderate Islam in Indonesia, a religious-conservatism group such as Islamic Defenders Front (Front Pembela Islam or FPI) had colored Islamic activism and populism in Indonesia in the last two decades. This group is indeed notoriously full of controversy because of harsh approaches and having a political mission, notably during the 2017 Jakarta gubernatorial election. The series of violent approaches and opposing Pancasila ideology then lead to the disbandment of FPI at the end of 2020 through a joint ministerial decision that brought several consequences, particularly in public perception. On the one hand, some might assume that public security, peace, and tranquillity have been achieved by violence-based group, but on the other hand, some might argue that this dissolution has received public sympathy as the government seems to be more authoritative and FPI bravely keep opposing and channeling public disappointment. Afterward, in early January 2021 with a new name, Islamic Brotherhood Front (Front Persaudaraan Islam or Neo-FPI) was reborn. This study aimed at exploring how Neo-FPI responds and transforms after being dissolved constitutionally by the government and to what extent this rebirth is accepted by the Muslim community. Through Sidney Tarrow's social movement theory, this research will assess Neo-FPI as a discourse of Islamic activism and populism through library research and will interview the group's members. The result of the study shows that the Neo-FPI might try to attempt on humanistic approach and moderation within the religious movement. However, substantially this group will not be different from the old version like an apple that falls not far from the tree. In addition, it is interesting to see how this group coup with the pandemic situation as the group's leader has been sentenced to jail due to legal issues.

Keywords

Democracy Neo-FPI Islamism Populism

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

An author who publishes in At-Tafkir agrees to the following terms:
  • Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
  • Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (eg post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (ex in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
How to Cite
Tsauro, A., & Taufiq, F. (2023). What Neo-FPI offers toward the Muslim Community: Exploring a New Face of Islamic Activism and Populism in Indonesia. At-Tafkir, 16(2), 114-128. https://doi.org/10.32505/at.v16i2.7365

References

  1. Abiyoso, W., & Thohari, S. (2019). Gerakan Front Pembela Islam (FPI) dalam Aksi Bela Islam tahun 2016 di Jakarta. Jurnal Kajian Ruang Sosial-Budaya, 3(2), 78–100.
  2. Akbarzadeh, S., & Mansouri, F. (2007). Islam and Political Violence: Muslim Diaspora and Radicalism in the West (Library of International Relations). Tauris Academic Studies.
  3. Amirullah. (2021, January 1). Eks FPI Bentuk Ormas Baru, Mahfud Md: Boleh, Asal Tak Melanggar Hukum. Tempo. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1419302/eks-fpi-bentuk-ormas-baru-mahfud-md-boleh-asal-tak-melanggar-hukum
  4. Baran, Z. (2009, January 28). Fighting the War of Ideas. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/europe/2005-10-01/fighting-war-ideas. (Accessed 20 April 2022).
  5. Bruinessen, M. V. (2013). Contemporary Developments in Indonesian Islam: Explaining the Conservative Turn (New ed.). Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  6. Burhani, A. N. (2017). The Banning of Hizbut Tahrir and the Consolidation of Democracy in Indonesia. 2017, 10.
  7. Daniel, N. (2009). Islam and the West: The Making of an Image. Oneworld.
  8. Even Though It Has Changed Its Name, FPI’s Activities Will Still Be Prohibited. (n.d.). VOI - Waktunya Merevolusi Pemberitaan. Retrieved May 23, 2022, from https://voi.id/en/news/25404/meski-berganti-nama-kegiatan-fpi-bakal-tetap-dilarang
  9. Hamdi, A. Z. (2013). Radicalizing Indonesian Moderate Islam from Within: The NU-FPI Relationship in Bangkalan, Madura. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 7(1), 71–95.
  10. Huda, S. (2020). Fpi: Potret Gerakan Islam Radikal Di Indonesia. Al-Hikmah, 5(2), Article 2. http://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/index.php/Ah/article/view/4282 (Accessed 10 May 2022).
  11. Indonesia, C. N. N. (n.d.). Yaqut Ungkap Eks FPI dan HTI Masih Bergerak di Bawah Tanah. nasional. Retrieved August 31, 2022, from https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20220330191715-20-778125/yaqut-ungkap-eks-fpi-dan-hti-masih-bergerak-di-bawah-tanah
  12. Islamic Brotherhood Television—IPTV - YouTube. (n.d.). Retrieved May 23, 2022, from https://www.youtube.com/c/IslamicBrotherhoodTelevisionIBTV
  13. Jahroni, J. (2004). Defending the Majesty of Islam: Indonesia’s Front Pembela Islam (FPI) 1998-2003. Studia Islamika, 11(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v11i2.601
  14. Media, K. C. (2020, December 30). 6 Alasan Pemerintah Bubarkan dan Larang Kegiatan FPI, https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/12/30/14545951/6-alasan-pemerintah-bubarkan-dan-larang-kegiatan-fpi (Accessed 10 May 2022).
  15. MHA Statement in Response to Media Queries on Abdul Somad Batubara. (n.d.). Ministry of Home Affairs. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from http://www.mha.gov.sg/mediaroom/press-releases/mha-statement-in-response-to-media-queries-on-abdul-somad-batubara/.
  16. Munajat. (2012). FPI (Islamic Defenders’ Front): The Making of a Violent Islamist Movement in the New Democracy of Indonesia [Thesis]. https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2012-05-10865
  17. Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah struggle with internal divisions in the post-Soeharto era. (n.d.). Indonesia at Melbourne. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://indonesiaatmelbourne.unimelb.edu.au/nahdlatul-ulama-and-muhammadiyah-struggle-with-internal-divisions-in-the-post-soeharto-era/
  18. NewsDesk, N. (2020, December 30). FPI Changed its Name to Islamic United Front. Netral News. https://netral.news/en/fpi-changed-its-name-to-islamic-united-front.html
  19. Osman, M. N. M. (2010). Reviving the Caliphate in the Nusantara: Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia’s Mobilization Strategy and Its Impact in Indonesia. Terrorism and Political Violence. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09546553.2010.496317
  20. Pernyataan DPP FPI Terkait Pendeportasian Ustadz Abdul Somad dari Singapura. (n.d.). Fakta Kini. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://www.faktakini.info/2022/05/pernyataan-dpp-fpi-terkait.html
  21. Post, T. J. (n.d.). Report links presiding justice of Ahok’s case review to FPI. The Jakarta Post. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2018/03/29/report-links-presiding-justice-of-ahoks-case-review-to-fpi.html
  22. Qurrata A’yun, R. (2020). Politicizing blasphemy in Indonesia: How Islamic Alliances are Established. Melbourne Asia Review, 4. https://doi.org/10.37839/MAR2652-550X4.19
  23. Redaksi. (2021, April 6). Sikap Publik Nasional terhadap HTI dan FPI. SaifulMujani. https://saifulmujani.com/sikap-publik-nasional-terhadap-hti-dan-fpi/
  24. Rizieq Sentenced to Eight Months in Jail for Health Protocol Violations. (2021, May 27). Jakarta Globe. https://jakartaglobe.id/news/rizieq-sentenced-to-eight-months-in-jail-for-health-protocol-violations
  25. Tsauro, Ahalla & Taufiq, Firmanda. 2022. The New FPI: Don’t Buy the Same Horse Twice. (2022, May 4). ISEAS Fulcrum Commentary. Available online at https://fulcrum.sg/the-new-fpi-dont-buy-the-same-horse-twice/
  26. The politics of banning FPI. (2021, June 18). New Mandala. https://www.newmandala.org/the-politics-of-banning-fpi/ (Accessed 10 May 2022).
  27. Times, I. D. N., & Rochmanudin. (n.d.). Isi Lengkap Pasal 6 AD/ART FPI yang Dipermasalahkan Mendagri. IDN Times. Retrieved May 23, 2022, from https://www.idntimes.com/news/indonesia/rochmanudin-wijaya/isi-lengkap-pasal-6-adart-fpi-yang-dipermasalahkan-mendagri
  28. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia No. 17 Tahun 2013 tentang Organisasi Kemasyarakatan, https://www.dpr.go.id/dokjdih/document/uu/UU_2013_17.pdf (Accessed 20 May 2022).
  29. Waty, R. R. (2021). The Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) As an Opposition Force in The Joko Widodo’s Era in 2014-2020. International Journal of Islamic Khazanah, 11(2), 118–133.
  30. Woodward, M., Yahya, M., Rohmaniyah, I., Coleman, D. M., Lundry, C., & Amin, A. (2014). The Islamic Defenders Front: Demonization, Violence and the State in Indonesia. Contemporary Islam, 8(2), 153–171.
  31. Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Facal, Gabriel. 2020. Islamic Defender Front Militia (Front Pembela Islam) and its Impact on Ongoing Religious Intolerance in Indonesia. TRaNS: Trans -Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia (2020), 8, 7–20 doi:10.1017/trn.2018.15.
  33. Wilson, Ian. 2014. Resisting Democracy: Front Pembela Islam and Indonesia’s 2014. ISEAS Perspective. Available online: iseas.edu.sg/images/pdf/ISEAS_Perspective_2014_10.pdf (accessed 27 May 2022)
  34. Ngatawi, Al-Zastrouw. 2006. Gerakan Islam simbolik: Politik kepentingan FPI (Symbolic movements of Islam: the essential politics of the FPI). Yogyakarta: LKiS.
  35. Saragih, Bagus. 2011. Wikileaks: National police funded FPI hard-liners. The Jakarta Post, 5 September.
  36. Widiyanto, Asfa. 2017. Violence in Contemporary Indonesian Islamist Scholarship: Habib Rizieq Syihad and ‘enjoining good and forbidding evil’.