Main Article Content

Abstract

To determine whether a hadith is á¹£Äḥīḥ or not is not enough if the research is carried out only to focus on aspects of its sanad, but research on content (al-matn) of ḥadÄ«th is also a step that should not be abandoned, because there is no guarantee that if sanad of a ḥadÄ«th is á¹£Äḥīḥ (á¹£Äḥīḥ al-isnÄd), so the matn of ḥadÄ«th is á¹£Äḥīḥ (á¹£Äḥīḥ al-matn) too. However, the studies of critics on matn al- ḥadÄ«th have so far still tend to be few. For that reason, through this paper, the authors tried to examine about the critique of matn al- ḥadÄ«th as an attempt to test the validity of the ḥadÄ«th of Rasulullah Saw. from the side of its content (al-matn). A Hadith is declared as á¹£Äḥīḥ al-matn if it fulfills two criteria, which is avoiding syÄdz and free from ‘illat. The steps that can be taken to critique the content of ḥadÄ«th are: compiling ḥadÄ«th that are intertwined in the same theme, conducting research on content of ḥadÄ«th with á¹£Äḥīḥ ḥadÄ«th approach and approach of the Qur'an, conducting research on content of ḥadÄ«th with language approach, and research content of ḥadÄ«th with a historical approach.

Keywords

Matan Hadis Sahih

Article Details

How to Cite
Siti Rohmaturrosyidah Ratnawati, & Ali Yasmanto. (2019). STUDI KRITIK MATAN HADIS: . Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 2(2), 209-231. https://doi.org/10.32505/v2i2.1163

References

  1. Abbas, Hasjim. Kritik Matan Hadis. Yogyakarta: Teras, 2004.
  2. Al-Adla>bi>, Shala>h al-Di>n bin Ah}mad. Manhaj Naqd al-Matn ‘ind ‘Ulama>’ al-Hadi>th al-Nabawi>, terj. Ita Qonita. Yogyakarta: Insan Madani, 2010.
  3. Al-Ghazali, Muhammad. Studi Kritik atas Hadis Nabi Saw. antara Pemahaman Tekstual dan Kontekstual, terj. Muhammad al-Baqir. Bandung: Mizan, 1998.
  4. Bustamin. Metodologi Kritik Hadis. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2004.
  5. Da>wu>d, Abu>. Sunan Abi> Da>wu>d, Jilid II, No. 1261. Mesir: Maktabah al-Tija>riyah al-Kubra>, 1950.
  6. Hudaya, Hairul. “Metodologi Kritik Matan Hadis Menurut Al-Adlabi Dari Teori ke Aplikasi.” Ilmu Ushuluddin 13, no. 1 (2014): 29–40.
  7. Ismail, M. Syuhudi. Metodologi Penelitian Hadis Nabi. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1992.
  8. Muammar, Arief. “Lemah Sanad Belum Tentu Lemah Matan.” Al-Bukhari: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis 1, no. 2 (2018): 207–21.
  9. Salamah Noorhidayati. Kritik Teks Hadis: Analisis tentang al-Riwa>yah bi al-Ma’na> dan Implikasinya bagi Kualitas Hadis. Yogyakarta: Teras, 2009.
  10. Sumbulah, Umi. Kritik Hadis: Pendekatan Historis Metodologis. Malang: UIN Malang Press, 2008.