Article Sidebar

Submitted
Mar 7, 2020
Accepted
Apr 29, 2020
Published
Jun 11, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 526 Download : 2025

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper focuses on maping hadiths studies which has been done by orientalists according to Harald Motzki. So far, the maping is always seen based on an assuption which results three sections namely sceptic, non-sceptic, and middle ground. Unlike prior studies, Motzki tries to divide hadiths studies in the West based on the method they use Based on it, it is obtained a conclusion that hadiths studies in the West are not stagnant and similiar. On the contrary, it undergoes a progress time by the time. Based on the method employed to examine the authenticity of hadiths. The study of hadith in the West can be classified into four divisions. First, is matan which was introduced by Ignaz Goldziher, Josep Schacht, and Marston Speight. Second, is dating based on collections of hadis books with Josep Schacht as a initiator. Third, is dating by isnad which was started by Josep Schacht and Juynboll. Fourth, is isnad-cum-matan which was embarked by Harald Motzki.

Keywords

Hadith Orientalist Maping Harald Motzki

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Ulummudin. (2020). Pemetaan Penelitian Orientalis Terhadap Hadis Menurut Harald Motzi. Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 3(1), 86-104. https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v3i1.1468

References

  1. Abbas,Hasyim .Kritik Matan Hadis Versus Muhaddisin dan Fuqaha. Yogyakarta: Kalimedia. 2016.
  2. Amin, Kamaruddin, Menguji Kembali Keakuratan Metode Kritik Hadis, Jakarta: Hikmah. 2009.
  3. Darmalaksana, Wahyudin, Hadis di Mata Orientalis: Telaah atas Pandangan Ignaz Goldziher dan Joseph Schacht, Bandung: Benang Merah. 2004.
  4. Faroh, Mar’ah Nailul, Hadis dan Orientalis (Teori Ignaz Gholdziher dan Joseph Schacht).
  5. Goldziher, Ignaz, Introduction to Islamic Theology and Law, terj. Andras dan Ruth Hamori Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1981.
  6. Idri, Perspektif Orientalis tentang Hadis Nabi: Telaah Kritis dan Implikasinya terhadap Eksistensi dan Kehujjahannya, dalam Al-Tahrir, Vo. 11, No. 1. 2011.
  7. Maizuddin, Book Review: Analisis Isnad Cum Matan: Mengukur Kritik Hadis Muslim dan Barat Kamaruddin Amin, Menguji Kembali Keakuratan Metodologi Kritik Hadis, Penerbit Hikmah: 2009, dalam jurnal Substantia, Vol.18, No. 2. 2016.
  8. Masrur, Ali, Teori Common Link G.H.A Juynboll: Melacak Akar Kesejarahan Hadits Nabi, Yogyakarta: Lkis. 2013.
  9. Masrur, Ali, Skeptisisme Ignaz Goldziher (1850-1921) terhadap Autentisitas Hadits dan Berbagai Tanggapannya, dalam jurnal Wawasan, Vol. 34, No. 2. 2011.
  10. Motzki, Harald, Dating Muslim Tradistions: A Survey, dalam Arabica, Leiden: Koninklijke Brill, 205, Vol. 52.
  11. Sumbullah, Umi, Kritik Hadis: Pendekatan Historis dan Metodologis, Malang: UIN Malang Press. 2008.
  12. Syamsuddin, Sahiron, Pemetaan Penelitian Orientalis Terhadap Hadis”, dalam Orientalisme al-Qur’an dan Hadis, ed. Nur Kholis setiawan & Sahiron Syamsuddin, Yogyakarta: Nawesea Press. 2007.
  13. Zuhri, Muh, Perkembangan Kajian Hadis Kesarjanaan Barat, dalam Ulul Albab Vol. 16, No. 2. 2015.