Article Sidebar

Submitted
Mar 26, 2020
Accepted
May 26, 2020
Published
Jun 24, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1431 Download : 8092

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Disputes among hadiths are a long lasting issue both for Muslims and outsiders who try to mislead the traditionas and create catastrophe in the community.Therefore,it is essential to understad the degree of a hadith more comprehensively, especially in hadiths learning processes. This research is a respond toward the critique of prophetic traditions and its urgency in learning. In this research , I will explore the matan of a hadith on the Prophet David fasting respectively. This research is a library research based on the textuals matan criticism found in the Islamic historical heritages. The results of this study are notes on how the application of matan criticism that occurred in the pre and post-codification periods as well as the validity method of matan critiques which free from shaz and “Illat. Also some notes on the urgency of learning the method of matan criticism.

Keywords

Matan Criticism Hadith Learning

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Alvida, A., & Shilviana, K. F. (2020). Kritik Matan dan Urgensinya Dalam Pembelajaran Hadis: Studi Hadis Puasa Daud. Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 3(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v3i1.1485

References

  1. Abbas,Hasyim .Kritik Matan Hadis Versus Muhaddisin dan Fuqaha. Yogyakarta: Kalimedia. 2016.
  2. al-Adlabi,Ṣalāhuddin bin Ahmad.Menalar Sabda Nabi: Menerapkan Metode Kritik Matan dalam Studi Hadis, Terj. Ita Qonita. Yogyakarta: Insan Madani. 2010.
  3. al-Adlabi,Ṣalāhuddin bin Ahmad.Manhaj Naqd al-Matnu ‘Inda ‘Ulama al-Ḥadiṡ an-Nabawī. Beirut: Dar Al-Afaq Al-Jadidah. 1403.
  4. al-Bukhārī, Muhammad bin Ismā’il. Ṣaḥiḥ al-Bukhārī. Beirut: Dārr Ibnu Kaṡir. 2002.
  5. al-Hajjaj, Muslim bin. Ṣaḥiḥ Muslim. Riyadl: Dār al-Islam. 2000.
  6. an-Nasā’i, Ahmad bin Syu’aib. Sunan an-Nasā’ī Juz 3. Beirut: Mu’asasah ar-Risālah. 2001.
  7. Asror, Miftahul & Imam Musbikin. Membedah Hadis Nabi. Madiun: Pustaka Pelajar, 2015.
  8. Hanbal, Ahmad bin.Musnad al-Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal Juz 11. Beirut: Mu’asasah ar-Risālah. tth.
  9. Isma’il, M. Syuhudi. Kaedah Kesahihan Sanad Hadis. Jakarta: Bintang Bulan. 1995.
  10. Ritonga,Ahmadi dkk., Kontribusi Pemikiran Salah Ad-Din Ibn Ahmad Al-Idlibi Dalam Metode Kritik Matan Hadis: Telaah Terhadap Manhaj Naqd Al-Matn ‘Ind Ulama Al-Ḥadiṡ An-Nabawī,”Jurnal at-Tahdis:Journal of Hadith Studies, Vol.1, No.1 Januari-Juni (2017).
  11. Saboe, Aloe. Hikmah Kesehatan dalam Puasa. Bandung: Arena Remaja Internasional. 1979.
  12. Shihab,M. Quraish.Tafsir al-Misbah. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2002.
  13. Sumbulah,Umi.Kritik Hadis Pendekatan Historis Metodologis. Malang: UIN Malang Press. 2008.
  14. Suryadi dan Muhammad Alfatih Suryadilaga, Metodologi Penelitian Hadits. Yogyakarta: TH-Press. 2009.
  15. Suryadi, “Rekonstruksi Kritik Sanad Dan Matan Dalam Studi Hadis”, Jurnal Esensia, Vol. 16, No. 2, Oktober (2015).
  16. Syarifuddin,Ahmad. Puasa Menuju Sehat Fisik dan Psikis. Jakarta: Gema Insani. 2003.
  17. Tasbih, “Analisis Historis Sebagai Intrumen kritik matan hadis”, Jurnal Al-Ulum, Vol. 11, No. 1 Juni (2011).
  18. Zed, Mestika. Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia. 2008.
  19. Zuhri, Muh. Telaah Matan Hadis Sebuah Tawaran Metodologis. Yogyakarta: Lesfi. 2003.