Article Sidebar

Submitted
Apr 13, 2020
Accepted
Jun 8, 2020
Published
Jun 24, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 538 Download : 4520

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper discusses the criticism conveyed by Rahman on the understanding of hadith that has been developed in the midst of Islamic societies regarding the hadith about the conquest of Constantinople, where so far the hadith about the conquest of Constantinople is believed to be the main driver of Islamic commanders to conquer Constantinople. But Fazlur Rahman denied it by stating that the hadith was a hadith that emerge during the period of defamation which was used by certain groups to support their ambitions. To support his suspicion, Rahman offers a methodology called the theory of historicity, where each hadith must be seen first in terms of the history that follows it. The results obtained from the hadith about the conquest caused a shift in understanding that had been believed by Muslims that the conquest of Constantinople was inspired by the hadith that was revealed by the Prophet Muhammad.

Keywords

Reinterpretation Constantinople Historicity

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Paizin, H. B. (2020). Reinterpretasi Hadis Penaklukan Konstantinopel Perspektif Fazlur Rahman. Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 3(1), 56-85. https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v3i1.1507

References

  1. Alma’arif, Alma’arif. “Hermeneutika Hadis Ala Fazlur Rahman.” Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis 16, no. 2 (2015).
  2. Amin, Muhammadiyah. “Kontekstualisasi Pemahaman Ḥadîth dan Rekonstruksi Epistemologi Ikhtilâf dalam Fiqh al-Ḥadîth.” ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 5, no. 2 (March 1, 2011).
  3. Assagaf, Ja’Far. “Kontekstualisasi Hukum Murtad Dalam Perspektif Sejarah Sosial Hadis.” Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan 14, no. 1 (June 30, 2014).
  4. Abd. A’la, Dari Neomodernisme ke Islam Liberal, Jakarta: Paramadina, 2003
  5. Abdul Mustaqim & Said Agil Munawwar, Asbab Al-Wurud Al-Hadis : Studi Kritis Hadis Nabi Pendekatan Sosio-Historis-Kontekstual, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2001
  6. Aghar Ali Engineer, The Origin And Development of Islam, Terj. Imam Baehaqi, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1999
  7. Ahmad Amin, Fajr al-Islam, Kairo: Maktabah al-Nahdah, 1965
  8. Ahmad as-Syarbasi, Eksiklopedia Apa dan Mengapa dalam Islam, Jakarta: Kalam Publika, 2009
  9. Ahmad bin Hanbal, Musnad Ahmad, Kairo: Muassah Ar-Risalah, 1999
  10. Ahmad Warson Munawwir, Kamus Al-Munawwir, Surabaya: Pustaka Progressif, 1997
  11. Al-Bukhori, Shohih al-Bukhari, “Kitab Ar-Riqaq, Bab: Raf’ul Amanah” Beirut: Dar Ibn Katsir, 1987
  12. Ali Mufrodi, Islam di Kawasan Kebudayaan Arab, Jakarta: Logos, 1999
  13. Fazlur Rahman, Islamic Methodology in History, Karaci: Central Institute of Islamic Reserch, 1965
  14. ------------------ Islamic Methodology in History,terj. Anas Mahyudin, Membuka Pintu Ijtihad, Bandung: Pustaka, 1984
  15. Hamud bin Abdullah Al-Tuwaijuri, Ithaf Al-Jama’ah bima Jaa fi Al-Fitan wa al-Malahim wa Asyrat As-Sa’ah, Mauqi’ Ar-Risalah Al-Islamiya, 1994
  16. Ibrahim Musa, “kata pengantar”, dalam Fazlur Rahman, Gelombang Perubahan dalam Islam: Studi Fundamentalis Islam, terj. Aam Fahmia, Jakarta: raja Grafindo Persada, 2000
  17. Jhon L. Esposito (ed), “Fazlur Rahman”, dalam The Oxford Encyclopedia of The Modern Islamic Word, New York: Oxford University Press, 1995
  18. Louis Ma’luf, al-Munjid fi al-lughoh, Cet. Ke-36, Beirut: Dar al-Masyriq, 1997
  19. Mundzir, Muhammad. “Reinterpretasi Hadis Perintah ‘Membunuh Manusia Sampai Mengucap Syahadat’ Sebagai Upaya Deradikalisasi Agama.” Kontemplasi: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 7, no. 01 (July 1, 2019).
  20. Mustari, Abdillah. “Poligami Dalam Reinterpretasi” 1, no. 3 (2014). http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/sipakalebbik/article/view/281.
  21. Muhammad Abduh, Al-A’mal Al-Kamilah, diedit oleh Muhammad ‘Amara), (Beirut: Al-Mu’assasah Al- ‘Arabiyah lid-Dirasah wan-Nasyr, 1972.
  22. Muhammad Ali Ash-Shalabi, Bangkit dan Runtuhnya Khilafah Utsmaniyah, Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar, 2003
  23. -----------------------------------, Fikih Tamkin; Panduan Meraih Kemenangan dan Kejayaan Islam, Cet. Ke-2, Jakarta: Pustaka al-Kautsar, 2013
  24. Muhammad bin Ali As-Syaukani, Nailu al-Authar, Mesir: Mustafa al-Babi al-Halabi, 1961
  25. Muhammad Dede Rudiyana, Perkembangan Pemikiran Hadis dari Klasik Sampai Modern, Bandung: pustaka setia, 2004
  26. Muhammad Fu’ad ‘Abd al-Baqy, al-Mu’jam al-Mufahras li Alfadz al-Qur’an al-Karim, Kairo: Dar al-Kutub al-Misriyyah, 1364
  27. Muhammad Nashiruddin Al-Albani, Silsilah Ad-Dha’ifah, Riyad: Maktabah Al-Ma’arif, 2008
  28. Qasim A. Ibrahim & Muhammad A. Shaleh, Al-Mauwsuah Al-Muyassar fi Al-Tarikh Al-Islami, Jakarta: Zaman, 2014
  29. R.A. Nicholson, A Literary History oh the Arabs, Cambridge, 1930
  30. Ramyi Al-Munyawi, Muhammad Al-Fatih, Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar, 2012
  31. Suratmaputra, Ahmad Munif. “Reinterpretasi Hadis-Hadis Perempuan.” MISYKAT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Quran, Hadist, Syari’ah Dan Tarbiyah 1, no. 2 (June 5, 2018).
  32. Suryadilaga, Muhammad Alfatih. “Kontekstualisasi Hadits Dalam Kehidupan Berbangsa dan Berbudaya.” KALAM 11, no. 1 (June 30, 2017).
  33. Ulya, Ulya. “Hermeneutika Double Movement Fazlur Rahman: Menuju Penetapan Hukum Bervisi Etis.” ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam 12, no. 2 (September 18, 2013).
  34. Taufik Adnan Amal, Islam dan Tantangan Modernitas: Studi atas Pemikiran Hukum Fazlur Rahman, Bandung: Mizan, 1989
  35. Tim Penyusun, Kamus Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa, 2008.
  36. Yuslem, Nawir. “Kontekstualisasi Pemahaman Hadis.” MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 34, no. 1 (June 2, 2010).