Article Sidebar

Submitted
Aug 3, 2023
Accepted
Dec 9, 2023
Published
Dec 13, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 108 Download : 60

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This article focuses on analyzing Orientalist arguments against hadith in the phase of Western skepticism. In this study, hadith is the subject and the main basis of discussion. The progress of Islamic civilization in the past has been an attraction for orientalists in studying Islam to subjugate Islamic civilization. This made hadith one of the targets of the orientalists' studies since it is one of the sources of Islamic epistemology. The skepticism of the early generation of orientalists claimed that hadith is a collection of anecdotes. This description will be explained using the library research method, focusing on the argumentation of orientalists in the phase of Western skepticism. The author analyses the data using content analysis. The author finds that there is a misunderstanding in the argumentation of the early generation of orientalists, and the argumentation is weak in terms of methodological and historical truth.

Keywords

Hadith Orientalis Autentisitas Hadis Skeptisisme

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rahman, R. A., Widodo, C. D., & Hidayat, M. S. (2023). Orientalist Studies on the Authenticity of Prophetic Hadiths . Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 6(2), 194-211. https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v6i2.6856

References

  1. Al-Bukhârî, `Abu Abdillâh Muhammad bin Ismâ’îl. Shaḥîh Al-Bukhâri. Riyad: Dâr al-Tayyibah, 1427.
  2. Abdul Ghani Abdul Khaliq, Ad-Difau Annis Sunnah, (Al-Qahirah: Maktabah As-Sunnah 1989)
  3. ---------------------------------, Hujjiayah As-Sunnah (Mansurah: Dar al-Wafa’, 1993)
  4. Ali Masrur, Neo-Skeptisisme Michael Cook dan Norman Calder Terhadap Hadis Nabi Muhammad, Jurnal THEOLOGIA, Vol 28 No 1 (2017).
  5. Dozan, Wely. “KAJIAN BARU KRITIK HADITS JOSEPH SCHACT Studi Analisis ‘Teori Projecting Back.’” Sophist : Jurnal Sosial Politik, Kajian Islam dan Tafsir 1, no. 1 (2019): 92–108.
  6. Fata, Zahrul, Muhammad Sofian Hidayat, and Amir Sahidin. “Dialektika Teks Dan Konteks Dalam Framework Pemahaman Hadis.” AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis 7, no. 1 (June 10, 2023): 269. http://journal.iaincurup.ac.id/index.php/alquds/article/view/5002.
  7. Fata, Zahrul, and Fachri Khoerudin. “Tradisi Kritik Sebagai Indikator Autentisitas Hadis Nabi.” Dialogia 18, no. 2 (December 27, 2020): 252–275. https://jurnal.iainponorogo.ac.id/index.php/dialogia/article/view/2437.
  8. Ginting, Ernawati. Nawir Yuslem. Sulidar. “PEMIKIRAN MUHAMMAD MUSTAFA AL-A‘ZAMI TENTANG PENULISAN HADIS DAN JAWABAN TERHADAP KRITIK JOSEPH SCHACHT TENTANG KEAUTENTIKAN HADIS.” AT-TAHDIS: Journal of Hadith Studies 01, no. 01 (2017): 95–107.
  9. Hamid Fahmi Zarkasyi. MISYKAT Refleksi Tentang Westernisasi, Liberalisasi, Dan Islam. Jakarta: INSISTS, 2012.
  10. Ibn al- Ṣalāḥ. Muqaddimah Ibn Al- Ṣalāḥ. (Suriah: Dār al-Fikr, 1989).
  11. Idri. Hadis & Orientalis Perspektif Ulama Hadis Dan Para Orientalis Tentang Hadis Nabi. Depok: KENCANA, 2017.
  12. Ignaz Goldziher. Muslim Studies Terj. C.R. Barber Dan S.M. Stren, Vol. 2. Chicago: State University of New York Press, 1971.
  13. -------------------, Introduction to Islamic Theology and Law, (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1979 M).
  14. Joseph Schacht, The Origin Of Muhammadan Jurisprudence (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959)
  15. Juynboll, Muslim Tradition: Studies in chronologhy, Provenance and Authorship of early hadith (Cambridge: Cambrige University Press, 1985 M)
  16. Munawwir, Ani Lestari, dan Fita Ratu Prilia, Joseph Schacht dan Transformasi Hadis Tentang Hukum Islam dalam Konteks Dunia Timur, Islamika: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, Vol. 20, No. 02, Desember 2020, 23-31
  17. Muhammad bin Mutir Az-zahrani, Tadwinu As-Sunnah An-Nabawiyyah Nasy’atuhu Wa Tathawwuruhu, (Riyad, Maktabah darul Minhaj, 1426 H)
  18. Muhammad Zubayr Siddiqi, Hadith Literature (Cambridge: The Islamic State Society, 1993)
  19. Mustafa al-Siba’I, Al-Sunnah Wa Makanatuha Fi Al-Tasyri’ Al-Islami (Beirut: al-Maktab al-Islami, 1402 H/1982 M)
  20. Muhammad Mustafa A’zami, Naqd Al-Hadis Inda Al-Muhadditsin (Riyad: Maktabah Al-Imariyah, 1982)
  21. Muhammad Ajjaj al-Khatib, Al-Sunnah Qabl Al-Tadwin (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1971 M)
  22. Subhi As-Shalih, Ulumul Hadis Wa Musthalahatuhu (Lebanon, darul ilmi lil malayin, 2009
  23. Relit Nur Edy. “AS-SUNNAH (HADITS) (Suatu Kajian Aliran Ingkar Sunnah).” ASAS Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 6, no. 2 (2014).
  24. Ritonga, Ahmadi, and Sulaiman M Amir. “KONTRIBUSI PEMIKIRAN AD-DIN IBN AHMAD AL-IDLIB´ DALAM METODE KRITIK MATAN HADIS: Telaah Terhadap Manhaj Naqd Al-Matn ‘Ind ‘Ulama’ Al-NabawI.” At-Tahdis: Journal of Hadith Studies 1, no. 1 (2017): 19.
  25. Saefudin Zuhri. “Orientalist Criticism of the Hadith (Tracing Theory‘The Spread of Isnad’ Michael Allan Cook).” Journal of Qur’ ᾱn and hadῑth studiesth studies 9, no. 2 (2020): 55–82.
  26. Syarifah, Umayyah. “Kontribusi Muhammad Musthafa Azami Dalam Pemikiran Hadis (Counter Atas Kritik Orentalis).” ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam 15, no. 2 (2015): 222.
  27. Syed-Muhammad-Naquib-Al-Attas. Islam And Secularism. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC, 1993.
  28. Tobroni, Imam Supriyogo and. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial Agama. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2003.
  29. Ugi Suharto, Peranan Tulisan Dalam Periwayatan Hadis, Islamia, THN I NO 2/JUNI-AGUSTUS 2004
  30. Zainuddin, Persolan Otentitas Hadist Perspektif Ignas Goldziher, Jurnal Qolamuna, Volume 1 Nomor 2 Februari 2016