Article Sidebar

Submitted
Oct 11, 2023
Accepted
Dec 9, 2023
Published
Dec 9, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 194 Download : 157

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper is about Imam Shaykhon (Bukhari and Muslim) leaving out a narration from Imam Shafi'i. A thing that is left out is certainly not free from causes and intentions. If a narration is left out of a hadith, there must be some shadz and illat in the hadith or the person who reported it. Then, is Imam Shafi'I unjust and has many shadz and illat. From the statements of the scholars about Imam Shafi'I, that he is a Hadith expert. Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal stated that if it were not for Shafi'I, I would not know hadith. This library research relies on library research materials, such as books, books, journals, encyclopedias, and magazines, as data sources to search and track these issues. From the findings of this research, that leaving the history of Imam Shafi'I has a purpose and a veil. Leaving his narration does not mean that there is an illat, but it shows praise and honor towards Imam Shafi'I.

Keywords

Historiography Mustholah Hadith History

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Saputra, M. R., al Ayubi, S., & Alif, M. (2023). Questioning the Distraction of Imam Shafi’I’s Absence in the Reports of Bukhari and Muslim. Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 6(2), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v6i2.7134

References

  1. Abdullah al-Syahir Haji Khalifah. Kasyfu Al-Dzunun an Usama Al-Kutub Wa Al-Funun. Libanon: Dar Ihya al-Turost al-Arabi, 1955.
  2. Abu Zakariya Yahya bin Syarf al-Nawawi. Shahih Muslim Bi Syarh Al-Nawawi. Mesir: Daru al-Taqwa li Turost, 2001.
  3. Al-Baghdadi, Imam Abu Bakr Ahmad bin Ali al-Khatib. Mas’alatu Al-Ihtijaj Bi Al-Shafi’i Fima Asnada Ilaihi Wa Al-Raddu Ala Al-Tha’inin Bi’azmi Jahlihim Alaihi. Riyadh: al-Arabiyah al-Su’udiyah, 1980.
  4. ———. Tarikh Madinati Salam. Libanon: Dar al-Gharb al-Islami, 2001.
  5. Al-Dzahabi, Imam al-Hafidz. Juz’un Fihi Tarjamatu Al-Al-Bukhari. Libanon: Muassasah al-Rayyan, 2002.
  6. Al-Subki, Taqiyudin. Ma’na Qoul Imam Al-Mutholibi Idza Shahha Al-Hadis Fahuwa Madzhabi. Muassasah Qurtubah, n.d.
  7. Al-Suyuthi, Imam Jalaluddin Abu Fadl Abdurrahman. Tadribu Al-Rawi Fi Syarh Al-Taqrib Al-Nawawi. Libanon, 1993.
  8. Ar-Razi, Fakhruddin. Manâqib Al-Imam as-Syâfi’i. Edited by Abdul Wahid Al-Shafi’i. Lebanon: Dar al-Kotob al-Ilmiyah, 2020.
  9. Darmalaksana, Wahyudin. “Rancang Bangun Aplikasi Pencarian Tematik Pada Hadits Riwayat Imam Muslim.” Al-Ulum 18, no. 2 (December 1, 2018): 383–394. https://journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/au/article/view/284.
  10. Hanbal, Ahmad bin Muhammad bin. Al-Musnad. Kairo: Daru al-Hadis, 1994. http://carihadis.com/Musnad_Ahmad/11228.
  11. Hendro, Beko. “Kritik Sanad Dan Matan Hadis Dalam Shahih Muslim Yang Dianggap Lemah Nasiruddin Al-Albani.” Studi HADIS Nusantara 3, no. 2 (2021): 121–137.
  12. Ibn Ḥajar al-‘Asqalānī. “Nuzhat Al-Naẓar Sharḥ Nukhbat Al-Fikr,” 1993.
  13. Jihad, Prof. “Asbab Tarku Al-Imam Al-Al-Bukhari Riwayah An Imam Shafi’i” (2017): 100–120.
  14. Kamaluddin, Ahmad. “Naqd As-Sanad : Metodologi Validasi Hadits Shahih.” MUSHAF JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Hadis 3, no. 2 (2023): 229–239.
  15. Karim, Abdul. “Manhaj Imam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal Dalam Kitab Musnadnya.” Riwayah 1, no. 2 (2015): 351–370.
  16. Khon, Abdul Majid. Ulumul Hadis. Edited by Lihhiati. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika Offest, 2015.
  17. Malik bin Anas. Al-Muwatha’ Bi Riwayati Yahya Bin Yahya Al-Laitsi. Edited by Muhammad Fuad Al-Baqi. Kairo: Darul Alamiyah li Nasyri wa Tajlid, 2016.
  18. Marzuki. “Kritik Terhadap Kitab Shahih Al-Al-Bukhari Dan Shahih Muslim” 6, no. 1 (2006): 26–38.
  19. Masyhuri Rifa’i, Hasniran. “Peran Imam As- Shafi’i Terhadap Perkembangan Hadis.” el-Maqra : Tafsir, Hadis, dan Teologi 2, no. 2 (2022): 89–101.
  20. Muadz, Abu Tharib bin Muhammad. Syarh Nukbatul Fikr. Riyadh: Darul Mugni, 2009.
  21. Muhammad Asrori Ma’sum. “EKSISTENSI KITAB SHAHIH MUSLIM (Studi Historis Penulisan Hadits Karya Imam Muslim)” 1, no. 2 (2013): 73–90.
  22. Nurcahaya, Nurcahaya. “Kitab Shahih Al-Bukhari (Kajian Tentang Identitas Dan Relevansinya Dengan Fase Kodifikasi Hadis).” Al-Fikru: Jurnal Ilmiah 14, no. 2 (2021): 92–99.
  23. Pratomo, Hilmy. “Telaah Kitab Tabaqat Al-Kubra Imam Al-Bukhari: Menelusuri Sejarah Periwayat Hadis.” Syariati 8, no. Mei (2022): 91.
  24. Salman, Masyhur Hasan Mahmud. Al-Imam Muslim Bin Hajjaj Shahibu Al-Musnad Al-Shahih Wa Muhadis Al-Islam Al-Kabir. Damaskus: Daar al-Qalam, 1994.
  25. Sugiyono, Prof. Dr. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA, 2016.
  26. Thahan, Mahmud. Taysir Musthalah Al Hadis. Indonesia: al-Haramain, 1985.
  27. Wahid, Abdul. “Studi Terhadap Aspek Keunggulan Kitab Sahih Muslim Terhadap Shahih Al-Bukhari.” Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura 17, no. 2 (2018): 312.
  28. Zabidi, Ahmad Fakhrurrazi Mohammed, Izzati Suhaimi. “Imam Al-Bukhari Dan Muslim Sebagai Tauladan Pelajar Hadis Masa Kini.” Jurnal wacana sarjana 5, no. June (2021): 1–12.
  29. Zainuddin Abdurrahim bin Husain al-Iraqi. Nazmu Duror Fi Ilmi Atsar. Kairo: Dar Ibnu al-Jauzi, 2012.
  30. Zin, Siti Mursyidah, PHayilah Yama, Muhammad Aizat, Syimir Rozani, Nur Saadah Hamisan, Aisyah Mat Jasin. “Kepelbagai Metode Sanad Dan Shajarat Al-Asanid Di Dalam Shahih Muslim [ The Diversity of Sanad Methods and Shajarat Al- Asānīd in Sahih Muslim ]” 13, no. 24 (2022): 1–8.