Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 21, 2024
Accepted
Jun 7, 2024
Published
Jun 15, 2024
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 381 Download : 272

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Research on Hadīṡ cannot be separated from two main elements, called sanad and matan. Among Hadīṡ scholars, research on sanad receives more attention than matan, which prompted Salahuddin al-’Aḍlabi to write the book "Manhaj Naqd al-Matn 'Ind Ulama al-Hadits al-Nabawi”, which specifically discusses the critique of Hadīṡ texts. Among several of his critical methodologies are critiques of the matan through rational, sensory, and historical approaches. This research uses descriptive analysis with a normative approach. The results of the analysis show that 1) Al-’Aḍlabi's critical methodology towards Hadīṡ texts that contradict Reason, Senses, and History employs several methods and approaches including hierarchical and integrative assumptions, as well as synchronization methods. 2) Some of Al-’Aḍlabi's assumptions employ a hierarchical approach, where each assumption cannot be separated from the Qur'an and Hadīṡ, reason, then senses, and followed by history. The hierarchical assumptions made can be done not necessarily in a structured (systematic) way but can be done randomly as long as the Qur'an and Hadīṡ remain the top priority in building assumptions. Al-’Aḍlabi's assumptions also use an integrative approach where his assumptions are built and mutually supported among various elements to produce a higher norm. 3) A variety of methods employed by Al-’Aḍlabi with rational, sensory, and historical approaches use synchronization methods. The synchronization method referred to is when there is a contradiction in understanding the Hadīṡ text.

Keywords

Salahuddin al-’Aḍlabi Reason Senses , History

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Muhammad Nabat Ardli, & Reza Hilmy Luayyin. (2024). SHALAHUDDIN AL-’AḌLABI: Methodological Analysis of Critique on Hadīṡ Texts Contrary to Reason, Senses, and History. Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 7(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v7i1.8476

References

  1. Afrizal, Lalu Heri. “Selisik Atas Metodologi Kritik Matan Ulama Hadis.” KALIMAH 14, no. 2 (September 30, 2016): 191–218. https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v14i2.612.
  2. Al-Adlabi, Shalahuddin ibn Ahmad. Manhaj Naqd Al-Matn ‘ind Ulama Al-Hadits Al-Nabawi. 1st ed. Beirut: Dar al-Afaq al-Jadidah, 1983.
  3. Al-Hakim, Muhammad Ibn Abd Allah. “Al-Mustadrak Ala Shahihain.” Nucl. Phys. 13, no. 1 (1959).
  4. Al-Qazwini. Muhammad bin Yazid bin Maja har-Rabi’I. Sunan Ibnu Majah. Mesir; Darul Alamiyah. 1704
  5. Asnajib, Muhammad. “Penafsiran Kontemporer Di Indonesia (Studi Kitab Tafsir at-Tanwir).” Jurnal Studi Al-Quran 16, no. 2 (2020): 181–98. https://doi.org/10.24235/diyaafkar.v8i1.5977.
  6. At-Tirmidzi. Muhammad bin ‘Isa bin Saurah bin Musa as-Sulami, Sunan Tirmidzi. Mesir; addarul alawiyah. 803
  7. Baiquni, Ach. “Tracing the Theory of Hadith Quality in Kitab Al-Jami’ Al-Sahih Al-Sunan Al-Tirmidzi.” Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis 4, no. 1 (2021): 68–81. https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v4i1.2468.
  8. Bakir, Mohammad. “KRITIK MATAN HADIS VERSI MUHADDISIN DAN FUQAHA’: STUDI PEMIKIRAN HASJIM ABBAS.” Jurnal Samawat 2, no. 2 (2018): 13–34.
  9. Devi, Aulia Diana. “Studi Kritik Matan Hadits.” Al-Dzikra: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Al-Hadits 14, no. 2 (2020): 293–312. https://doi.org/10.24042/digunakan.
  10. Ghifari, Muhammad. “Strategi Efektif Dalam Mencegah Penyebaran Hadis Palsu Di Media Sosial.” The International Journal of Pegon : Islam Nusantara Civilization 9, no. 01 (2023). https://doi.org/10.51925/inc.v9i01.83.
  11. Ismail, M. Syuhudi. “Metodologi Penelitian Hadis Nabi.” Bulan Bintang, 1992.
  12. Kusnandar, Engkus. “Studi Kritik Matan Hadis (Naqd Al-Matn) Kajian Sejarah Dan Metodologi.” Jurnal Studi Hadis Nusantara 2, no. 1 (2020): 1–20.
  13. Moleong, Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. 26th ed. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya, 2009.
  14. Muhsin, Masrukhin. “KRITIK MATAN HADIS Studi Komparatif Antara Sarjana Muslim Dan Sarjana Barat.” ALQALAM 34, no. 1 (2017): 167–202.
  15. Mushthoza, Zidna Zuhdana, Nurus Syarifah, Fatia Inast Tsuroya, and Ahmad Zainal Mustofa. “Teori Projecting Back Dan Argumentum E-Silentio Joseph Schact Serta Aplikasinya Dalam Studi Kritik Hadis.” Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis 3, no. 2 (2020): 171–86. https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v3i2.1545.
  16. Nurlaila. “KUALITAS HADIS TENTANG WARISAN BERBEDA AGAMA.” Al-Mu’ashirah 13, no. 2 (2016): 182–96.
  17. Pamil, Jon, Endang Soetari Ad, Dalam Menakar, Hadits Nabi, Penggambaran Teori, Dan Praktik, Ali Akhbar, Abaib Mas, Rabbani Lubis, and Sejarah D A N Urgensi. “Ilmu Hadits: Kajian Riwayah Dan Dirayah.” UIN SMH Banten 37, no. 1 (2012).
  18. Rasjiddin, Sjafri. “METODOLOGI KRITIK MATAN DALAM KITAB AL-MAUDHU’AT KARYA IBN AL-JAUZI.” MEDIASI 9, no. 2 (2015): 17–27.
  19. Suryadi, Suryadi. “Rekonstruksi Kritik Sanad Dan Matan Dalam Studi Hadis.” ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 16, no. 2 (2015). https://doi.org/10.14421/esensia.v16i2.996.
  20. Suryadinata, M. “Kritik Matan Hadis: Klasik Hingga Kontemporer.” Ushuluna 2, no. 2 (2016).
  21. Tangngareng, Tasmin. “METHODOLOGY OF HADITH CONTENT CRITICISM: A Study on the Thought of Salah Al-Din Bin Ahmad Al-Adlabi.” ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin 17, no. 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.14421/esensia.v17i1.1281.
  22. Ulya, Atiyatul. “KRITIK KUALITAS MATAN HADIS PEREMPUAN LEMAH AKALNYA PERSPEKTIF SALAHUDIN IBN AHMAD AL-ADLABI.” Jurnal Ushuluddin 26, no. 1 (June 4, 2018): 57–68. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v26i1.4269.
  23. Wahid, Ramli Abdul, and Dedi Masri. “PERKEMBANGAN TERKINI STUDI HADIS DI INDONESIA.” MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 42, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v42i2.572.
  24. Zuhriah, Al-vidatuz, and Khusna Farida Shilviana. “Kritik Matan Dan Urgensinya Dalam Pembelajaran Hadis: Studi Hadis Puasa Daud.” Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis 3, no. 1 (2020): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v3i1.1485.