Article Sidebar

Submitted
Oct 20, 2023
Accepted
Aug 31, 2024
Published
Aug 31, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 129 Download : 53

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research is aim to verify the affecting Factor of Attitude Platform Usage , contemporary investigating the dominant factor that determines The Platform Usage Intention. Hypothesis testing were conducted using Quantitative method. The Research was conducted using an online survey approach. The Sample comprised 218 customers. The data collected were analyzed using PLS (Partial Least Square) Structural Equation Model. This Paper attempted to examine the customer response about the Kind of Courier Service Business that provide an organized system which operate in Indonesia by using TAM. The Findings indicated that technology usage was predicted by Behavioral Intention, while Behavioral Intention influenced by Attitude and Perceived Usefulness, when attitude and perceived usefulness were predicted by Perceived ease of use. Perceived Ease of Use Equals to Perceived Usefulness. While Perceived usefulness failed to affect attitude toward technology usage

Keywords

TAM, Path Analysis, Draiv Application, Usage Intention

Article Details

How to Cite
junita, J. S. (2024). The Application Of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) In Verifying “Draiv” Usage Intention. J-EBIS (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam), 9(1), 139-156. https://doi.org/10.32505/j-ebis.v9i1.7181

References

  1. Agung Ayu Puty Andrina, A., Jordan Kurniadi, C., Hendrika Kenang, I., & FCW Sutrisno, T. (2022). The role of technology acceptance model factors on purchase intention in e-commerce. BISMA (Bisnis Dan Manajemen), 14(2), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.26740/bisma.v14n2.p160-176
  2. Ajzen, I., & Fisbbein, M. (1974). Factors Influencing Intentions and the Intention-Behavior Relation. Human Relations, 27(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872677402700101
  3. Ali, I., & Warraich, N. F. (2024). Meta-analysis of technology acceptance for mobile and digital libraries in academic settings using technology acceptance model (TAM). Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-09-2023-0360
  4. Azjen, I., & Fishbein. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (Englewoods Cliffs, Ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall.
  5. Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. (1986). An investigation of the effectiveness of color and graphical information presentation under varying time constraints. MIS Q., 10(1), 59–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/248881
  6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  7. Davis, F. D. (2010). Information Technology Introduction. 13(3), 319–340.
  8. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  9. de Andrés-Sánchez, J., Arias-Oliva, M., Souto-Romero, M., & Gené-Albesa, J. (2024). Assessing the Acceptance of Cyborg Technology with a Hedonic Technology Acceptance Model. Computers, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/computers13030082
  10. Felber, N. A., Lipworth, W., Tian, Y. J., Roulet Schwab, D., & Wangmo, T. (2024). Informing existing technology acceptance models: a qualitative study with older persons and caregivers. European Journal of Ageing, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-024-00801-5
  11. Fishbein, M. A., & Ajzen, I. (2011). I.(1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Addison-Wesley, May 1975.
  12. Förster, K. (2024). Extending the technology acceptance model and empirically testing the conceptualised consumer goods acceptance model. Heliyon, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27823
  13. Jaleta, M. E., & Tulu, M. N. (2024). Logistics and Customs Digitalization Practices Assessment Using a Technology Acceptance Model. Africa Journal of Business and Economics, 2023(2), 2617–0086. https://journals.ju.edu.et/index.php/jbeco
  14. Jinglong, L., Me, R. C., & Qisen, Z. (2024). Developing Age-oriented Design Framework with Technology Acceptance Model for Smart Appliances to improve Technology Acceptance by Ageing Community in Guangzhou China. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(4), 899–909. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i4/21233
  15. Li, X., Gao, Z., & Liao, H. (2024). An empirical investigation of college students’ acceptance of translation technologies. PLoS ONE, 19(2 February). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297297
  16. Magsamen‐Conrad, K., Billotte Verhoff, C. C., & Dillon, J. M. (2022). Technology Acceptance Models. In The International Encyclopedia of Health Communication (pp. 1–8). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119678816.iehc0776
  17. Noor, N. (2024). Technology acceptance model in halal industries: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Journal of Islamic Marketing, April. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-02-2024-0077
  18. Otto, D., Assenmacher, V., Bente, A., Gellner, C., Waage, M., Deckert, R., Siepermann, M., Kammer, F., & Kuche, J. (2024). Student Acceptance of Ai-Based Feedback Systems: an Analysis Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (Tam). INTED2024 Proceedings, 1(March), 3695–3701. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2024.0973
  19. Santiadi, S., Tri, A., Majiah, P., Deviani, N., Ruis, A., Annabel, K. F., & Karnalim, O. (2024). Analisis Perbandingan Moodle dan Google Classroom Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model. 1. https://doi.org/10.21460/jutei.81.288
  20. Sarwono, J. (2011). Mengenal Path Analysis (Sarwono). Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis, 11(2), 285–296.
  21. Sayekti, F., & Putarta, P. (2016). PENERAPAN TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL ( TAM ) DALAM PENGUJIAN MODEL PENERIMAAN SISTEM INFORMASI KEUANGAN DAERAH. 3, 196–209.
  22. Sorce, J., & Issa, R. R. A. (2021). EXTENDED TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL ( TAM ) FOR ADOPTION OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY ( ICT ) IN THE US CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY. 26. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2021.013
  23. Toros, E., Asiksoy, G., & Sürücü, L. (2024). Refreshment students’ perceived usefulness and attitudes towards using technology: a moderated mediation model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02839-3
  24. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2016). Interventional factors affecting instructors adoption of e-learning system: A case study of palestine. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 83(1).
  25. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  26. Vuković, M., Pivac, S., & Kundid, D. (2019). Technology Acceptance Model for the Internet Banking Acceptance in Split. Business Systems Research, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2019-022

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'WHERE'