Article Sidebar

Submitted
Oct 21, 2022
Accepted
Dec 6, 2022
Published
Dec 31, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 286 Download : 12763

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Religious moderation is becoming a prevalent focus to achieve social harmony and peace, preventing extremism, intolerance, and acts of violence. The current study aims to investigate the psychometric properties of an instrument measuring students' religious moderation attitudes. The research method used is the quantitative construction of measuring instruments. The scale development indicator uses the four dimensions of religious moderation developed by the Indonesian Ministry of Religion. The scale development procedure involved 10 experts consisting of academics and employees of the Metro City Ministry of Religion. 135 Respondents for the instrument trials were drawn using a random sampling technique, taking into account students of IAIN Metro in semesters 3, 5, and 7 who were still active. The results show that based on the consistency value of experts, which is known through the interquartile range (Q), there are 60 items out of 78 declared significant. The content validation category based on Aiken's V count is 0.693, which is interpreted as a moderate category. The items have been validated by experts and fulfilled the discriminatory power criteria according to the psychometric analysis prerequisites. Based on the validity test results, using the baseline correlation on 60 items, 36 items fulfilled the validity level. Reliability testing shows a coefficient of 0.800 (reliable) means that this scale is consistent. These findings are expected to benefit the measurement of students' religious moderation attitudes and serve as a need assessment in the establishment of regulations and policies in higher education.

Keywords

Thurstone Scale Psychometry Religious Moderation

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Halik, A., Khumairo, A., & Yawisah, U. (2022). The Instrument Construction for Students’ Religious Moderation: Psychometric Analysis. ENLIGHTEN: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Islam, 5(2), 80-94. https://doi.org/10.32505/enlighten.v5i2.4895

References

  1. Abdi, A. P. (t.t.). Setara Institute Sebut 10 Kampus Terpapar Paham Radikalisme. tirto.id. Diambil 7 Mei 2021, dari https://tirto.id/setara-institute-sebut-10-kampus-terpapar-paham-radikalisme-d9nh
  2. Abdullah, M., Nasution, A., Siregar, Abd. A., & et all. (2020). Literasi Moderasi Beragama di Indonesia. Bengkulu: Zigie Utama.
  3. Abu-Raiya, H., & Hill, P. C. (2014). Appraising the state of measurement of Islamic religiousness. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 6(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035082
  4. Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863870092005
  5. Ali, H., & Purwandi, L. (2016). Indonesia 2020: The Urban Middle Class Millenials. Jakarta: Alvara Strategi Indonesia.
  6. Amir, Y. (2021). Pengembangan Skala Religiusitas untuk Subyek Muslim. Indonesian Journal for The Psychology of Religion, 1(1), Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.24854/ijpr403
  7. Antara. (2020, Januari 18). Survei Wahid Institute: Intoleransi-Radikalisme Cenderung Naik. https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/284269/survei-wahid-institute-intoleransi-radikalisme-cenderung-naik
  8. Aslam, M. M., & Gunaratna, R. (2019). Terrorist rehabilitation and community engagement in Malaysia and Southeast Asia. Routledge London.
  9. Azra, A. (2003). Bali and Southeast Asian Islam: Debunking the myths. After Bali: The Threat of Terrorism in Southeast Asia, 39–57.
  10. Azra, A. (2017). Islam Indonesia Inklusif vs Eksklusif: Dinamika Keberagaman Umat Muslimin. Makalah untuk Pengajian Ramadhan PP Muhammadiyah Kampus Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, 6.
  11. Azwar, S. (2013). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Jakarta: Kencana.
  12. Barker, E. (2022). New Religious Movements. Dalam L. R. Kurtz (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace, & Conflict (Third Edition) (hlm. 339–353). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820195-4.00286-7
  13. Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S., Prewett, M. S., Gray, A. A., Stilson, F. R., & Tuttle, M. D. (2009). Normative Scoring of Multidimensional Pairwise Preference Personality Scales Using IRT: Empirical Comparisons with Other Formats. Human Performance, 22(2), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959280902743303
  14. Coaley, K. (2014). An Introduction to Psychological Assessment & Psychometrics (2nd edition). SAGE.
  15. Davidshofer, K. R., & Murphy, C. O. (2005). Psychological testing: Principles and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
  16. Furr, R. M., & Bacharach, V. (2008). Psychometrics and the importance of psychological measurement. Psychometrics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
  17. Guffey, J. E., Larson, J. G., Zimmerman, L., & Shook, B. (2007). The development of a Thurstone scale for identifying desirable police officer traits. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 22(1), 1–9.
  18. Hadiz, V. R. (2016). Islamic populism in Indonesia and the Middle East. Cambridge University Press.
  19. Hasanuddin, A. (t.t.). » Ideologi Negara: Pancasila atau Islam? - Alvara Strategic Ideologi Negara: Pancasila atau Islam? Diambil 6 Mei 2021, dari https://alvara-strategic.com/ideologi-negara-pancasila-atau-islam/, https://alvara-strategic.com/ideologi-negara-pancasila-atau-islam/
  20. Hendryadi, H. (2017). Validitas Isi: Tahap Awal Pengembangan Kuesioner. Jurnal Riset Manajemen dan Bisnis (JRMB) Fakultas Ekonomi UNIAT, 2(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.36226/jrmb.v2i2.47
  21. Jabali, F., & Jamhari, I. (2002). Modernisasi Islam di Indonesia (Jakarta). Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España].
  22. Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2017). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues. Cengage Learning.
  23. Kholis, N., Azra, A., Hasan, N., Qodir, Z., Qibtyah, A., Sadzali, A., & Min Fadhli Robby, H. (2020). Islam Indonesia 2020. UII Press Yogyakarta.
  24. Krabbe, P. F. M. (2008). Thurstone Scaling as a Measurement Method to Quantify Subjective Health Outcomes. Medical Care, 46(4), 357–365. JSTOR.
  25. Lisnawati, S. (2011). Development Of Emotional Quotient Instrument. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 2(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.21009/JEP.021.05
  26. McDonald, R. P. (2013). Test theory: A unified treatment. psychology press.
  27. Meiza, A. (2018). Sikap Toleransi dan Tipe Kepribadian Big Five pada Mahasiswa UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. Psympathic : Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 5(1), Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v5i1.1959
  28. Mikha, A. W. (2013). Statistika Terapan; Konsep dan Aplikasi SPSS/LISREL dalam Penelitian Pendidikan, Psikologi dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.
  29. Munir, M. B., & Herianto, H. (2020). Tingkat Pemahaman Moderasi Beragama Serta Korelasinya Terhadap Pengaruh Kesehatan Mental, Keaktifan Berorganisasi dan Prestasi Akademik. Prosiding Nasional, 3, 137–150.
  30. Murtadlo, M. (2020). Menakar Moderasi Beragama di Perguruan High. Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kemenag RI. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/jg8hx
  31. Mutalazimah, -, Azwar, S., & Murti, B. (2014). Penskalaan Thurstone pada Aitem Thyroid Dysfunction Questionnaire (TDQ) Berbasis Gejala Biopsikososial. Jurnal Psikologi, 41(2), Art. 2. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.6945
  32. Nasir, M., & Rijal, M. K. (2021). Keeping the middle path: Mainstreaming religious moderation through Islamic higher education institutions in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 11(2), Art. 2. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v11i2.213-241
  33. Osterlind, S. J. (2006). Modern measurement: Theory, principles, and applications of mental appraisal. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
  34. PPIM UIN Jakarta. (2021). Potret Moderasi Beragama di Kalangan Mahasiswa Muslim  :Kasus Tiga Kampus Islam (Jakarta, Bandung, Yogyakarta). Pusat Pengkajian Islam dan Masyarakat (PPIM) UIN Jakarta.
  35. Pratama, D. (2020). Pengembangan Skala Thurstone Metode Equal Appearing Interval untuk Mengukur Sikap Moderasi Beragama Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Psikologi Teori dan Terapan, 11(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.26740/jptt.v11n1.p71-82
  36. Rahayuni, K., Yunus, M., & Fadil, R. (2015). Analisis Psikometri Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Kuesioner Athletic Coping Stress Inventory-28 (CSAI-28) Dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Motion: Jurnal Riset Physical Education, 6(1), 17–31.
  37. Rijal, M. K., Nasir, M., & Rahman, F. (2022). Potret Moderasi Beragama di Kalangan Mahasiswa. PUSAKA, 10(1), Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.31969/pusaka.v10i1.672
  38. Rudge, C. V., Calderon, I. M., Dias, A., Lopes, G. P., Barbosa, A. P., Maestá, I., Odland, J. Ø., & Rudge, M. V. (2009). Design and validity of a questionnaire to assess sexuality in pregnant women. Reproductive Health, 6, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-6-12
  39. Schmid, A. P. (2015). Challenging the narrative of the “Islamic State.” The Hague: International Centre for Counter-Terrorism, 14.
  40. Setiawati, F. A., Mardapi, D., & Azwar, S. (2013). Penskalaan Teori Klasik Instrumen Multiple Intelligences Tipe Thurstone dan Likert. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 17(2), Art. 2. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v17i2.1699
  41. Yusuf, A. M. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Penelitian Gabungan (4 ed.). Kencana.
  42. Zufriani, Z., Pitriani, P., & Damni, A. (2022). Rasch analysis of student attributes: Development and validation of scale to measure religious moderation. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 8(1), 187–195.