Main Article Content

Abstract

Accidents are often caused by the driver himself, other people, or even the circumstances while driving. Even emotions influence behavior while driving. Individual factors relate to personality type. This research aims to determine the influence of agreeableness and neuroticism personality types on driving risks mediated by driving safety attitudes. The methods used in this research are experiments and surveys. The experimental tool used in this research is a driving simulator with the help of Urban Driving software. The experimental group was treated with a traffic volume and pedestrian density of 75%, and the control group was treated with a traffic volume of 50%. The measurement instruments used in this study consisted of a measure of risky driving behavior, a measure of aggressive driving behavior, a measure of agreeableness and neuroticism from the Big Five Scale, and attitudes towards safe driving. Thirty participants in this study were divided into two groups, namely the experimental and the control groups, with 15 participants. Based on the regression results of each group. The regression results show an influence of agreeableness and neuroticism mediated by driving safety attitudes on driving risks in the experimental and control groups; however, both groups have indirect impacts. These results prove that personality type greatly influences driving risk, mediated by driving safety attitudes.

Keywords

agreeableness attitude safety driving neuroticism risky driving

Article Details

Author Biographies

Maria Chrisnatalia, Department of Psychology, Gunadarma University, West Java, Indonesia

Maria Chrisnatalia has been a lecturer in the Faculty of Psychology at Gunadarma University since 2016. Her research is often conducted in the field of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. She can be contacted at maria_c@staff.gunadarma.ac.id

Dian Kemala Putri, Department of Industrial Technology, Gunadarma University, West Java, Indonesia

Dian Kemala Putri is a lecturer at the Faculty of Industrial Technology, Department of Industrial Engineering at Gunadarma University since 2003. Her research has often been conducted in Human Factor Engineering/Ergonomics

Karmilasari, Department of Industrial Technology, Gunadarma University, West Java, Indonesia

Karmilasari has been a lecturer at the Faculty of Industrial Technology, Department of Informatics Engineering at Gunadarma University since 1998. Her research is often carried out in human and computer interaction and game technology.

Stephanus Benedictus Bera Liwun, Department of Industrial Technology, Gunadarma University, West Java, Indonesia

Stephanus Benedictus Bera Liwun is a lecturer at the Faculty of Industrial Technology, Department of Industrial Engineering at Gunadarma University since 2013. His research is often conducted in the fields of Human Factor Engineering, Ergonomics and Industrial and Organizational Psychology

How to Cite
Chrisnatalia, M., Putri, D. K., Karmilasari, & Bera Liwun, S. B. (2023). The influence of personality type on the risk of driving. INSPIRA: Indonesian Journal of Psychological Research, 4(2), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.32505/inspira.v4i2.6916

References

  1. Al-Tit, A. A. (2020). The impact of drivers’ personality traits on their risky driving behaviors. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 30(4), 498-509. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2019.1700866
  2. Anonym. (2019, 28 January). Jerman berdebat tentang pembatasan kecepatan di jalan tol. DW Made for Minds. https://www.dw.com/id/jerman-berdebat-tentang-pembatasan-kecepatan-di-jalan-tol/a-47264391
  3. Winfred, A. Jr., & G, Graziano. W. (1996). The five‐factor model, conscientiousness, and driving accident involvement. Journal of Personality, 64(3), 593-618. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00523.x
  4. Aszhari, A. (2020, March 11). 83 persen kecelakaan lalu lintas terjadi karena pengemudi. Liputan 6. https://www.liputan6.com/otomotif/read/4199287/83-persen-kecelakaan-lalu-lintas-terjadi-karena-pengemudi
  5. Bapeda. (2021). Data kecelakaan dan pelanggaran lalu lintas, data vertikal Kepolisian Republik Indonesia daerah. Jogja Dataku. https://bappeda.jogjaprov.go.id/dataku/data_dasar/index/548-data-kecelakaan-dan-pelanggaran-lalu-lintas?id_skpd=39
  6. Raymond, Bingham. C., & T, Shope. Jean. (2004). Adolescent developmental antecedents of risky driving among young adults. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 65(1), 84-94. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.15288/jsa.2004.65.84
  7. Burtăverde, V., Chraif, M., Aniţei, M., & Dumitru, D. (2017). The hexaco model of personality and risky driving behavior. Psychological Reports, 120(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116688890
  8. Carey, RN. (2013). The impact of threat appeals on risky driving behaviors [Unpublished master thesis]. National University of Ireland.
  9. Chraif, M., Aniţei, M., Burtăverde, V., & Mihăilă, T. (2016). The link between personality, aggressive driving, and risky driving outcomes–testing a theoretical model. Journal of Risk Research, 19(6), 780-797.
  10. Chen, C. F. (2009). Personality, safety attitudes, and risky driving behaviors—Evidence from young Taiwanese motorcyclists. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41(5), 963-968. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2015.1042500
  11. Chrisnatalia, M., Ancok, D, Putri, DK & Karmilasari. (2021). Aggressive driving and the risk of driving toward to drivers. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT), 6(6), 1291-1300. https://ijisrt.com/aggressive-driving-and-the-risk-of-driving-toward-to-drivers
  12. Chrisnatalia, M., Jie, L., Jixiong, C., & Wei, Z. (2023). Risk driving review from Big Five Personality. World Psychology, 2(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.55849/wp.v2i2.113
  13. City Car Driving. (2001-2021). City car driving 1.5 description. https://citycardriving.com/products/citycardriving
  14. Dahlen, E. R., & White, R. P. (2006). The big five factors, sensation seeking, and driving anger in the prediction of unsafe driving. Personality and Individual Differences. 41(5), 903–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.03.016
  15. Deery, H. A. (1999). Hazard and risk perception among young novice drivers. Journal of Safety Research, 30(4), 225–236. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/S0022-4375(99)00018-3
  16. Deery, H. A., & Fildes, B. N. (1999). Young novice driver subtypes: Relationship to high-risk behavior, traffic accident record, and simulator driving performance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 41(4), 628-643. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872099779656671
  17. Deffenbacher, J. L., Lynch, R. S., Oetting, E. R., & Yingling, D. A. (2001). Driving anger: correlates and a test of state-trait theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(8), 1321-1331. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00226-9
  18. Deffenbacher, J. L., Deffenbacher, D. M., Lynch, R. S., & Richards, T. L. (2003). Anger, aggression, and risky behavior: A comparison of high and low anger drivers. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(6), 701-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7967(02)00046-3
  19. Deffenbacher, J. L., White, G. S., & Lynch, R. S. (2004). Evaluation of two new scales assessing driving anger: The Driving Anger Expression Inventory and the Driver’s Angry Thoughts Questionnaire. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(2), 87-99. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000013656.68429.69
  20. Dula, C. S., & Geller, E. S. (2003). Risky, aggressive, or emotional driving: Addressing the need for consistent communication in research. 34, 559–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2003.03.004
  21. Hermita, M. (2016). Positive affect, negative affect sensation seeking and driving skill on dangerous driving behavior mediated by self-regulation in different cognitive load level [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universitas Gunadarma.
  22. Idris, F., & Napitupulu, L. (2015). Pengaruh faktor kepribadian, stres kerja terhadap kecelakaan jalan raya pada supir bus di Provinsi Riau. An-Nafs, 9(3), 56-67.
  23. Iversen, H., & Rundmo, T. (2004). Attitudes towards traffic safety, driving behaviour and accident involvement among the Norwegian public. Ergonomics, 47(5), 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130410001658709
  24. Jiang, C., & Rau, P. L. P. (2018). Rule obedience as a mediator between normlessness and risky driving in hazy conditions. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 59, 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.09.002
  25. Lafont, A., Roge, J., Ndiaye, D., & Boucheix, J. M. (2018). Driver’s emotional state and detection of vulnerable road users: Towards a better understanding of how emotions affect drivers’ perception using cardiac and ocular metrics. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 55, 141-152. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.032
  26. Lajunen, T. (2001). Personality and accident liability: are extraversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism related to traffic and occupational fatalities? Personality and individual differences, 31(8), 1365-1373. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00230-0
  27. Lucidi, F., Mallia, L., Lazuras, L., & Violani, C. (2014). Personality and attitudes as predictors of risky driving among older drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 72, 318–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.022
  28. Mallia, L., Lazuras, L., Violani, C., & Lucidi, F. (2015). Crash risk and aberrant driving behaviors among bus drivers: the role of personality and attitudes towards traffic safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 79, 145-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.034
  29. Matthews, G., Dorn, L., Hoyes, T. W., Davies, D. R., Glendon, A. I., & Taylor, R. G. (1998). Driver stress and performance on a driving simulator. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 40(1), 136-149. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872098779480569
  30. McCauley, M. E., & Sharkey, T. J. (1992). Cybersickness: Perception of self-motion in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 1(3), 311-318. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1992.1.3.311
  31. Miles, D. E., & Johnson, G. L. (2003). Aggressive driving behaviors: are there psychological and attitudinal predictors? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 6(2), 147-161. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/S1369-8478(03)00022-6
  32. Ministry of Transportation of the Republic of Indonesia. (2015). Regulation of the Minister of Transportation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2015. Regulation of the Minister of Transportation concerning Procedures for Setting Speed Limits. Ministry of Transportation of the Republic of Indonesia.
  33. Monteiro, R. P., de Holanda Coelho, G. L., Hanel, P. H., Pimentel, C. E., & Gouveia, V. V. (2018). Personality, dangerous driving, and involvement in accidents: Testing a contextual mediated model. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58(9), 106-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.06.009
  34. Popuşoi, S., & Holman, A. (2016). Driving anger and aggressive tendency: The moderating role of emotion regulation strategy. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Series VII: Social Sciences. Law, 9(58), 153-164.
  35. Ramdhani, N. (2012). Adaptasi bahasa dan budaya dari Skala Kepribadian Big Five. Jurnal Psikologi, 39(2), 189-205. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.6986
  36. Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., & Knafo, A. (2002). The big five personality factors and personal values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 789–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289008
  37. Schweigert, W. A. (2021). Research methods in psychology: A handbook. Waveland Press.
  38. Shen, B., Ge, Y., Qu, W., Sun, X., & Zhang, K. (2018). The different effects of personality on prosocial and aggressive driving behaviour in a Chinese sample. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 56, 268-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.04.019
  39. Sullman, M. J. M. (2015). The expression of anger on the road. Safety Science, 72, 153–159. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.08.013
  40. Triman, A., & Bagaskara, S. (2017). Peran trait kepribadian terhadap perilaku mengemudi pengendara bermotor di Jakarta. Jurnal Psikogenesis, 5(2), 150-158. http://doi.org/10.24854/jps.v5i2.503
  41. Tronsmoen, T. (2010). Associations between driver training, determinants of risky driving behaviour and crash involvement. Safety Science, 48(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.05.001
  42. Ulleberg, P., & Rundmo, T. (2003). Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers. Safety Science, 41(5), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(01)00077-7
  43. Wang, F., Zhang, J., Wang, S., Li, S., & Hou, W. (2020). Analysis of driving behavior based on dynamic changes of personality states. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2), 430. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fijerph17020430
  44. Yang, J., Du, F., Qu, W., Gong, Z., & Sun, X. (2013). Effects of personality on risky driving behavior and accident involvement for Chinese drivers. Traffic Injury Prevention, 14(6), 565–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2012.748903
  45. Zhang, H., Qu, W., Ge, Y., Sun, X., & Zhang, K. (2017). Effect of personality traits, age, and sex on aggressive driving: Psychometric adaptation of the Driver Aggression Indicators Scale in China. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 103, 29-36. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.016