Main Article Content

Abstract

There is a debatable issue about the use of traditional and alternative assessment in ELT in the 21st century. The issue comes from the effectiveness of using traditional and alternative assessment to help teacher to assess the students in classroom situations in ELT. The problem is the teachers do not have better perspective in the challenges of assessment of ELT in the 21st century through alternative assessment or using both traditional and alternative assessment in classroom situation. That problem makes the use of assessment is not really effective to assess specific skill (listening, reading, writing, and speaking) of the students. This study aims, therefore, to investigate teachers’ perspective on the use of traditional and alternative assessment in ELT. The methodology of the research is using survey research with fifty English teachers as samples of this research. The data was collected by using questionnaire combine with open-ended questions relate with teachers’ perspective on traditional and alternative assessment. The results show that many teachers are really comfort with traditional assessment rather than alternative assessment since they claimed that traditional assessment is easier and more familiar to conduct in classroom situation. However, those perspectives have to be changed, the teacher should use both traditional and alternative assessment based on appropriate purposes and skills because there are challenges in assessment of ELT in 21st century to make the assessment process become more effective to improve students’ performance in English. It will be helpful by knowing the advantages and disadvantages of using traditional and alternative assessment in classroom situation to help the teacher to use them balance in the teaching and learning process.      

Keywords

ELT, traditional assessment, alternative assessment, teachers’ perspective.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fadilah, R., Ayudhia, H. Y., Chairani, V. S., & Afni, F. (2023). Assessment of English Language Teaching for 21st Century: Teachers’ Perspectives on Traditional and Alternative Assessment. JADEs Journal of Academia in English Education, 4(1), 108-130. https://doi.org/10.32505/jades.v4i1.6023

References

  1. Abbas, Zainab. 2012. Difficulties in Using Methods of Alternative Assessment In Teaching from Iraqi Instructors Points of View. AL-Fatih Journal . No.48. http://www.iasj.net/iasj?func=fulltext&aId=39413.
  2. Bliem, Carribeth L, Kathyrin H. Davinyor. 1997. Teachers’ Belief about Assessment and Instruction in Literacy. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) Center for the Study of Evaluation (CSE) Graduate School of Education & Information Studies. University of California, Los Angeles. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED352389.pdf.
  3. Brown, D, & Abeywickrama, T. 2010. Language assessment: Principles and Classroom practices. New York: Pearson Longman.
  4. Brown, H. Douglas. 2001. Teaching by Principles, An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  5. Brown, H. Douglas. 2004. Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practice. New York: Pearson Education.
  6. Chandio, Muhammad Tufail, Saima Jafferi. 2015. Teaching English as a Language not Subject by Employing Formative Assessment. Journal of Education and Educational Development Vol. 2 No. 2 pp. 151 – 171. http://www.doe.iobm.edu.pk/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/section-6-Chandio.pdf.
  7. Cheng, W., & Warren, M. 2005. Peer assessment of language proficiency. Language Testing, pp.93-121. http://ira.lib.polyu.edu.hk/bitstream/10397/618/1/LT_298.pdf.
  8. Creswell, Jhon. W. 2012. Educational Research, Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Boston: Pearson Education.
  9. Derakhshan, Ali, Saeed Rezaei, Minoo Alemi. 2011. Alternatives in Assessment or Alternatives to Assessment: A Solution or a Quandary. International Journal of English Linguistics Vol. 1, No. 1. ISSN 1923-869X. www.ccsenet.org/ijel.
  10. Dikli, Semire. 2003. Assessment at a distance: Traditional vs. Alternative Assessments. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET volume 2 Issue 3 Article 2. ISSN: 1303-6521 . http://www.tojet.net/articles/v2i3/232.pdf.
  11. Dogan, Musthafa. 2011. Student teachers’ views about assessment and evaluation methods in mathematics. Educational Research and Reviews Vol. 6(5), pp. 417-431. ISSN 1990-3839. http://www.academicjournals.org/ERR.
  12. Fatalaki, Javad Ahmadi. 2015. Teacher – Based Language Assessment. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences Vol. 60 (2015) pp 77-82. doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.60.77. Retrieved from https://www.scipress.com/ILSHS.60.77.pdf.
  13. Franenkel, Jack R, Norman E. Wallen, and Helen H. Hyun. 2012. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraww-Hills.
  14. Forutan, Ali. 2014. Traditional Versus Alternative Writing Assessment. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research – Volume 2, Issue 7, Autumn 2014. http://jfl.iaun.ac.ir/article_11667_9a13ffb39e5b12cd9793ac34aa5e8b54.pdf.
  15. Hamm, Mary, and Dennis Adam. 2009. Activating Assessment for All Students : Innovative Activities, Lesson Plans, and Informative Assessment. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
  16. Harmer, Jeremy. 2007. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Malaysia: Pearson Education Limited.
  17. Hawley, Katherine, 2013. “Teacher Perspectives on the Instructional Impact of the Florida Alternate Assessment" . Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Retrieved from http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5886&context=etd.
  18. Herman, Joan L, et al. 1992. A practical Guide to Alternative Assessment. Alexandria : ASCD publication.
  19. Herman, Joan L, Davina C. D. Klein, and Sara T. Wakai. 1997. American Students’ Perspective on Alternative Assessment : Do they know it’s different?. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) Center for the Study of Evaluation (CSE) Graduate School of Education & Information Studies. University of California, Los Angeles. https://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/TECH439.pdf.
  20. Hidayati, Nurul. 2016. The Authenticity of English Language Assessment for the Twelfth graders of SMK (Vacation High school). Premise Journal. Volume 5 No 1. ISSN: 2442-482x (printed)ISSN: 977244248DD3. http://fkip.ummetro.ac.id/journal/index.php/english/article/download/429/390.
  21. Janisch, Carol, Xiaoming Liu,and Amma Akrofi. 2007. Implementing Alternative Assessment: Opportunities and Obstacles. The Educational Forum Volume 71 spring 2007. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ763213.pdf.
  22. Kavaliauskien˙e, Galina, Ligija Kaminskien˙e & Lilija Anusien˙e. 2007. Reflective Practice: Assessment of Assignments in English for Specific Purposes. IBÉRICA 14 [2007]: 149-166. http://www.aelfe.org/documents/14-08_galina.pdf.
  23. Macias, Diego Fernando. 2015. A Call for Language Assessment Literacy in the Education and Development of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language. Colomb. Appl. Linguist. J. Vol. 17 .Number 2 pp. 302-312. ISSN 0123-4641. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283317148.
  24. Meihami, Hussein, and Seyyed Ayatollah Razmjoo. 2016. An Emic Perspective Toward Challenges and Solutions of Self- and Peer-Assessment in Writing Courses. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education. DOI 10.1186/s40862-016-0014-7. https://sfleducation.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40862-016-0014-7.
  25. Nasab, Fatemah Ghanavati. 2015. Alternative versus Traditional Assessment. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research Volume 2, Issue 6, pp.165-178. ISSN: 2376-760X. http://www.jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/viewFile/136/pdf136.
  26. Nunan, D. 1988. The Learner Centred Curriculum. A Study in Second Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Simonsom, Michael, Sharon Smaldino, and Susan Zwacek. 2015. Teaching and Learning at a Distance, Foundation of Distance Education. USA : IAP–Information Age Publishing, Inc.
  28. Vasu, Kayatri, Chai Hui Ling, Vahid Nimehchisalem. 2016. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature. Vol. 5 No. 5 ISSN 2200-3592. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.5p.158.