Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jun 12, 2023
Accepted
Jul 6, 2023
Published
Jul 6, 2023
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 233 Download : 162

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research focuses on peer review as a pedagogical strategy that can help students improve their writing and critical thinking skills.If students are to succeed in the modern world, they must acquire critical thinking (CT) skills, which are essential skills. This study uses a qualitative approach. The data collected specifically consists of written learning activities that use literary works as teaching materials. The aims of the study is to understand how peer editing improves students' critical thinking through recount text. The results of this study indicate that peer editing techniques have an influence on students' critical thinking skills in writing recount texts. Students get good grades gradually in the final cycle, with the average student score in the initial test of 63.2, the average student score in the first cycle is 75.4, and the student average score in the second cycle is 80. 3. In conclusion, peer editing techniques can improve students' thinking skills in writing recount texts.

Keywords

Peer review Peer assessment Writing Recount Text Critical thinking

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Pasaribu, M., Valentina, V., Talunohi, Y., Lumbanbatu, A. G., & Husda, A. (2023). Peer Editing to Enhance Student’s Critical Thinking In Recount Text. JADEs Journal of Academia in English Education, 4(1), 131-146. https://doi.org/10.32505/jades.v4i1.6268

References

  1. Ainsai, S. & Poonlarp, T. (2017). More Heads Are Better Than One: Peer Editing in a Translation Classroom of Efl Learners. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 54(December), 82–107.
  2. Amelia, D. A. (2020). The Influence Of Using Peer Editing Towards Students’ Writing Ability In Recount Text At The First Semester Of Tenth Grade Of Sma Negeri 17 Bandar Lampung In The Academic Year Of 2019/2020. Tarbiyah And Teacher Training Faculty State Islamic University Studies Of Raden Intan Lampung, 21(1), 1–9.
  3. Bertrand, B. J. (2013). Peer Editing in Composition for Multilingual Writers at the College Level. EWU Dgital Commons.
  4. Deni, A. R. M. & Zainal, Z. I. (2009). Peer-Editing Practice in the Writing Classrooms: Benefits and drawbacks.
  5. Eman Mohamed, A.-H. & Hasnaa Sabry, A.-H. A. H. (2014). Using Digital Storytelling and Weblogs Instruction to Enhance EFL Narrative Writing and Critical Thinking Skills Among EFL Majors at Faculty of Education. International Research Journal, 5(1), 8–41.
  6. Mercedes, N. & Galvis, D. (2010). Peer Editing : a Strategic Source in EFLStudents ’ Writing Process. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 12(12), 85–98.
  7. Moleong, L. J. (2016). Metedologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Vol. 2448). Kakek Nenek.
  8. Pharr, D. & Buscemi, S. V. (2005). Writing today: Contexts and Options for the Real World. McGraw-Hill Companies.
  9. Tias, A. P. (2018). The Influence Of Using Peer Editing Technique Towards Students’ Writing Ability In Descriptive Text At The Eighth Grade Of SMP Negeri 1 Limau Tanggamus In The Academic Year Of 2018/2019. Tarbiyah And Teacher Training Faculty University Of Islamic Studies Raden Intan Lampung 2018.
  10. Tompkins, G. E. (2003). Teaching writing: Balancing process and product. Macmillan College.

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'WHERE'