Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research are to find conceptual metaphors and their persuasive functions employed by Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto on his speech at the Shangri-La Dialogue 2024. This research utilizes a qualitative descriptive method, grounded in the conceptual metaphor theory (CMT) by Lakoff and Johnson (1980) and the categories of persuasive purposes of metaphors as outlined by Charteris-Black (2018). The research found three types of conceptual metaphors: Important is Depth (orientational metaphor), strategies are tools (ontological metaphor), and trust is a financial asset (structural metaphor). These metaphors serve various persuasive functions, including ideological, empathetic, predicative, and heuristic purposes. The findings may be valuable for those interested in using conceptual metaphors as persuasive tools to engage and influence their audiences.
Keywords
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
- Abdel-Qader, L. M., & Al-Khanji, R. R. (2022). Conceptual Metaphor in COVID-19 Speeches of the American President Joe Biden. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(4), 810–818. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1204.24
- Auliani f, Kismullah, & B. (2023). An Analysis of Figurative Language Used in Selected Song Lyrics of taylor Swift in 1989 Album. 1(2), 107–116.
- Beknazarova, U. U., Almautova, A. B., Yelemessova, S. M., & Abadildayeva, S. K. (2021). The cognitive function of a conceptual metaphor and its methodological foundations. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(3), 1312–1324. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.94
- Charteris-Black, J. (2018). Analysing Political Speeches Rhetoric, Discourse, and Metaphor. Blomsburry Publishing, 53–54.
- Danesi, M. (2018). Message, Signs, and Meaning: A Basic Textbook in Semiotics and Communication Theory. Analytical Biochemistry, 11(1), 1–5. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-59379-1%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420070-8.00002-7%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2015.03.024%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2018.1441103%0Ahttp://www.chile.bmw-motorrad.cl/sync/showroom/lam/es/
- Dawd, K. O., & Salih, S. M. (2020). Covert Persuasion in English Advertisements and Political Speeches. Koya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.14500/kujhss.v3n1y2020.pp41-52
- Flusberg, S. J., Lauria, M., Balko, S., & Thibodeau, P. H. (2020). Effects of Communication Modality and Speaker Identity on Metaphor Framing. Metaphor and Symbol, 35(2), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2020.1767336
- Joshua, & Xiao, S. (2022). Metaphor in Literary Prose and its Cross-Cultural Transfer: A Case Study of Jinpingmei and its Two English Versions. International Journal of Linguistics Studies, 2(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijls.2022.2.2.15
- Kompas.com. (2024, June 2). [FULL] Pidato Prabowo di Shangri-La Dialogue 2024, Tegaskan Indonesia Siap Bantu Korban Gaza [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvpfEjEwe2o
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By.pdf (p. 129).
- Linkeviciute, V. (2023). Conceptual metaphors in Volodymyr Zelensky’s political discourse. Studies about Languages, 1(43), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sal.1.43.35264
- Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Methods for the Social Sciences Global Edition.
- Malah, Z., & Taiwo, D. S. (2020). Conceptual Metaphors in President Muhammadu Buhari’s Political Rhetoric. International Linguistics Research, 3(4), p27. https://doi.org/10.30560/ilr.v3n4p27
- Sari, R. P., & Tawami, T. (2018). Metafora konseptual pada wacana retorika politik. Jurnal Akrab Juara, 3(Vol 3 No 4 (2018)), 59–69. http://akrabjuara.com/index.php/akrabjuara/article/view/414/339
- Siriam, S., & Widyastuti, S. (2023). The translation of conceptual metaphor in political news. Diksi, 31(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.21831/diksi.v31i1.56899
- Soenjaya, R. M., & Sari, R. P. (2022). METAFORA PADA WEBSITE THE MARK HOTEL. MAHADAYA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 2(2), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.34010/mhd.v2i2.7822