Main Article Content

Abstract

The current article discusses English for young learner (EYL) teacher's challenges on professional development (PD) and divides the issues into three parts. The study is based on the experiences of EYL teachers' challenge on PD in teaching English. The article starts by discussing the conceptualization of PD.  Next, it delves into model, benefit and characteristics of effective PD. The last part discusses EYL teachers' challenges on PD and its implication. This study has contributed to the research field by providing in-depth insights into Indonesian EYL teachers' challenges on PD. The findings from this study raise EYL teachers' awareness of their own challenges on PD. This article provides a theoretical basis for understanding the flux and the dynamic nature of EYL teachers' challenge on PD for further research. Finally, this paper discusses the limitations of this study and provides suggestions for future research.

Keywords

English as a foreign language (EFL) challenges Professional Development

Article Details

How to Cite
Hamdani, B. (2022). EYL Teachers’ Challenges on Professional Development. JADEs Journal of Academia in English Education, 3(1), 97-115. https://doi.org/10.32505/jades.v3i1.9820

References

  1. Afrilyasanti, R., & Basthomi, Y. (2024). Multilingual interventions in feedback: communication strategy in teacher professional development training. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2024.2312899
  2. Alemdag, E., Cevikbas, S. G., & Baran, E. (2020). The design, implementation and evaluation of a professional development programme to support teachers’ technology integration in a public education centre. Studies in Continuing Education, 42(2), 213-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2019.1566119
  3. Alibakhshi, G., & Dehvari, N. (2015). EFL teachers' perceptions of continuing professional development: A case of Iranian high school teachers. Profile issues in teachers’ professional development, 17(2), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v17n2.44374
  4. Al-Maamari, F. S. (2021). The potential in student evaluation of teaching for EFL teacher professional development. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1888670. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1888670
  5. Baecher, L., & Chung, S. (2020). Transformative professional development for in-service teachers through international service learning. Teacher Development, 24(1), 33-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2019.1682033
  6. Basikin, B. (2020). English teachers’ motivation for a professional development program: Perspectives of Self-Determination Theory. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i1.24982
  7. Birman, B. F., Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., & Garet, M. S. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational leadership, 57(8), 28-33.
  8. Bozbıyık, M., & Morton, T. (2023). Lecturers’ use of examples in online university English-medium instruction: a micro-analytic classroom interaction and knowledge-building perspective. Language and Education, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2023.2173528
  9. Crandall, J. J., & Christison, M. (2016). An overview of research in English language teacher education and professional development. Teacher education and professional development in TESOL, 3-34. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/97813156 41263-1
  10. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10. 3102/ 0013189X08331140
  11. Drajati, N. A., So, H. J., Rakerda, H., & Sulistyawati, H. (2023). Exploring the Impact of TPACK-based Teacher Professional Development (TPD) Program on EFL Teachers' TPACK Confidence and Beliefs. Journal of Asia TEFL, 20(2), 300-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2023.20.2.5.300
  12. Edwards, C., & Willis, J. R. (Eds.). (2005). Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522961
  13. Ellis, R. (2005). Principles of instructed language learning. System, 33(2), 209-224. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j. system.2004.12.006
  14. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers’ college record, 103(6), 1013-1055.https://doi.org/10.1111/0161- 4681.00141
  15. Fitriyah, I., Masitoh, F., & Widiati, U. (2022). Classroom-based language assessment literacy and professional development need between novice and experienced EFL teachers. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46539
  16. Gudeta, D. (2022). Professional development through reflective practice: The case of Addis Ababa secondary school EFL in-service teachers. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2030076. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2030076
  17. Guskey, T. R. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi delta kappan, 84(10), 748-750. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170308401007
  18. Helsing, D. (2007). Regarding uncertainty in teachers and teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(8), 1317-1333.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.06.007
  19. Hınız, G., & Yavuz, A. (2024). Real needs, tailored solutions: Developing customized online professional development programs for teachers—A case study. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2024.2325972
  20. Hsu, Y. Y., & Lin, C. H. (2020). Evaluating the effectiveness of a preservice teacher technology training module incorporating SQD strategies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00205-2
  21. Jiang, J. (2017). Higher education in China. In Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53637-7
  22. Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. R. (2020). Informing and transforming language teacher education pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 24(1), 116-127.https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688187 77539
  23. Kennedy, A. (2005). Models of continuing professional development: A framework for analysis. Journal of in-service education, 31(2), 235-250.
  24. Knapp, M. S. (2003). Chapter 4: Professional development as a policy pathway. Review of research in education, 27(1), 109-157. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X027001109
  25. Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and teacher education, 19(2), 149-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742- 051X(02)00101-4
  26. Lee, K. H., & Chowdhury, R. (2018). Factors influencing native English-speaking teachers’ professional practices in South Korean primary schools. Korea TESOL Journal, 14(1), 79-103.
  27. Lieberman, A., & Pointer Mace, D. H. (2009). The role of ‘accomplished teachers’ in professional learning communities: Uncovering practice and enabling leadership. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 15(4), 459-470.https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600903057237
  28. Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 15(2), 129-151.
  29. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737015002129
  30. Lo, N. P. K., & To, B. K. H. (2023). The transformation of identity of secondary school teachers: Professional development and English language education strategies in Hong Kong during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2163790. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2163790
  31. Mercader, C., & Gairín, J. (2020). University teachers' perception of barriers to the use of digital technologies: the importance of the academic discipline. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0182-x
  32. Nguyen, H. T. M., Phan, T. D. Q., & Le, M. D. (2019). Teachers’ professional learning in the context of language education reforms. In Building Teacher Capacity in English Language Teaching in Vietnam (pp. 80-98). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429457371
  33. Pareja Roblin, N., & Margalef, L. (2013). Learning from dilemmas: teacher professional development through collaborative action and reflection. Teachers and Teaching, 19(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13540602.2013.744196
  34. Powell, C. G., & Bodur, Y. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of an online professional development experience: Implications for a design and implementation framework. Teaching and teacher education, 77, 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.004
  35. Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. (2005). Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. Cambridge University Press.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667237
  36. Sak, M. (2024). Tracking motivational changes in self-initiated professional development in ELT: a single-case analysis. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2315107
  37. Sanders, K., Kraimer, M. L., Greco, L., Morgeson, F. P., Budhwar, P. S., Sun, J. M. J., ... & Sang, X. (2022). Why academics attend conferences? An extended career self-management framework. Human Resource Management Review, 32(1), 100793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100793
  38. Scribner, J. P. (1999). Professional development: Untangling the influence of work context on teacher learning. Educational administration quarterly, 35(2), 238-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161 X99352004
  39. Shawer, S. (2010). Classroom‐level teacher professional development and satisfaction: teachers learn in the context of classroom‐level curriculum development. Professional development in education, 36(4), 597-620. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2010.489802
  40. Smith, K. (2017). Teachers as self-directed learners. Singapore: Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3587- 6
  41. Sparks, D., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1989). Five models of staff development for teachers. Journal of staff development, 10(4), 40-57.
  42. Starkey, L., Yates, A., Meyer, L. H., Hall, C., Taylor, M., Stevens, S., & Toia, R. (2009). Professional development design: Embedding educational reform in New Zealand. Teaching and teacher education, 25(1), 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.08.007
  43. Tanjung, F. Z., Musthafa, B., & Wirza, Y. (2021). Voice of EFL mentor teachers: Mentorship for mutual professional development. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(3), 986-1005. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i3.20401
  44. Tsui, A. B. (2013). Distinctive qualities of expert teachers. In International perspectives on veteran teachers (pp. 19-37). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600903057179
  45. Uzorka, A., Ajiji, Y., Osigwe, M. U., & Ben, I. N. (2021). An Investigation of the Teaching Needs of Faculty Members with Regard to Technology. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 5(1), 70-106. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.152
  46. Wang, L. Y., & Lin, T. B. (2013). The representation of professionalism in native English-speaking teachers’ recruitment policies: A comparative study of Hong Kong, Japan, Korea and Taiwan. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 12(3), 5-22.
  47. Yin, J. (2018). Empowering teachers through core reflection: A case in Korea. Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(4), 1005.https://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.4.8.1005