Main Article Content

Abstract

Approaches, strategies, and methods are significant elements that highly divine the successful teaching and learning process. Having been concerned with two different teaching approaches, this research study aimed to explore the comparison between the Genre-Based Approach (GBA) and Problem-Based Learning (PBL) implementation in English subjects for junior high school students. This research used a comparative descriptive study located at MTs Negeri 1 Malang and MTs Negeri 2 Malang. In-depth interviews and direct observations were two primary data collection techniques in this research. The data analysis was conducted using data reduction, presentation, and conclusion.  The findings revealed key distinctions in implementation: GBA at MTsN 1 Malang followed four stages (BKoF, MoT, JCoT, and ICoT) with modifications like peer-review activities and interactive modeling, which enhanced students' listening, writing, speaking, and collaboration skills. In contrast, PBL at MTsN 2 Malang emphasized critical thinking through authentic problem-solving tasks in five stages, including guided investigations, group presentations, and reflections, which fostered critical thinking, communication, and cooperation. Both methods were effective in improving English skills and fostering collaboration, though GBA focused more on building individual understanding, while PBL prioritized problem-solving and group interaction.

Keywords

Genre-based approach problem-based learning English teaching approach

Article Details

Author Biographies

Fanisa Zahrani Firsta, UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

  •  

Maslihatul Bisriyah, UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

  •  
How to Cite
Istifadah, Ulin Nuha Annafiah, A., Zahrani Firsta, F., & Bisriyah, M. (2024). Genre-Based VS Problem-Based Approaches: A Comparative Study in English Classrooms for Junior High School Contexts. JADEs Journal of Academia in English Education, 5(2), 287-304. https://doi.org/10.32505/jades.v5i2.9875

References

  1. Abbaszadeh, Z. (2013). Genre-based approach and second language syllabus design. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 1879–1884.
  2. Ali, S. S. (2019). Problem based learning: A student-centered approach. Englih Language Teaching, 12(5), 73–78.
  3. Ardianti, R., Sujarwanto, E., & Surahman, E. (2021). Problem-based Learning : Apa dan Bagaimana. 3(1), 27–35.
  4. Arndt, H. L., & Woore, R. (2018). Vocabulary learning from watching YouTube videos and reading blog posts. Language Learning and Technology, 22(3), 124–142.
  5. Aydoǧan, H., & Akbarov, A. A. (2014). The four basic language skills, whole language & intergrated skill approach in mainstream university classrooms in Turkey. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(9), 672–680. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n9p672
  6. Carrasquillo, A. L. (1993). Whole native language instruction for limited-English-proficient students. In Angela Carrasquillo and Carolyn Hedley (Eds.), Whole Language and the Bilingual Learner. NJ: Ablex Publishing Company.
  7. Darmawan, I. P. A. (2021). Total Quality Management Dalam Dunia Pendidikan: Model, Teknik dan Impementasi. Widina Bhakti Persada.
  8. Esema, D. (2012). Problem Based Learning. Satya Widya Susari, Evi Kurniawan, Daniel, 28(2), 167–173.
  9. Estrini, D. (2021). Penerapan Genre Based Approach (Gba) dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris SMPN 1 Panimbang. Teacher: Jurnal Inovasi Karya Ilmiah Guru, 1(1), 96–101.
  10. Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami Desain Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Humanika: Kajia Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(1), 33–54.
  11. Farris, P., & Kaczmarski, D. (1988). Whole language, a closer look. Contemporary Education, 59(2), 77–81.
  12. Feez, S., & Joyce, H. (1998). Writing skills: Narrative and non-fiction text types.
  13. Gerlach, V. S., & Ely, D. P. (1980). Teaching and Media a Systematic Approach. Prentice Hall.
  14. Hammond, J., Burns, A., Joyce, H., Brosnan, D., Gerot, L., Solomon, N., & Hood, S. (1992). English for social purposes: A handbook for teachers of adult literacy. National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.
  15. Hox, J. J., & Boeije, H. R. (2004). Data Collection, Primary vs. Secondary. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, Elsevier Inc., 1, 593–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00041-4
  16. Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Method Sourcebook Edition 3. Sage.
  17. Ikawati, W. (2023). Meningkatkan hasil belajar bahasa Inggris siswa dengan metode Problem Based Learning. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan (JIP) STKIP Kusuma Negara, 14(2), 186–193.
  18. Istifadah, Mukti, T. S., & Noviafitri, K. S. (2022). Learning Outcomes of Listening Comprehension Skills through Audio Visual and Interactive-Audio. JETLe (Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning), 3(2), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.18860/jetle.v3i2.15623
  19. Mayasari, A., Arifudin, O., & Juliawati, E. (2022). Implementasi Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) dalam Meningkatkan Keaktifan Belajar. Jurnal Tahsinia, 3(2), 167–175.
  20. Narasintawati, L. S., Huraiyah, & Aliyah, S. (2020). Penerapan Genre Based Approach (GBA) dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris SMP. Indonesian Journal of Teacher Education, 1(2), 93–102.
  21. Nazir, M. (1988). Metode Penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia.
  22. Pujiati, H., & Tamela, E. (2018). English Teaching and Learning Strategies on Genre Based Approach in Indonesian EFL Class : A Case Study. Seventh International Conference on Languages and Arts (ICLA 2018), 301, 397–403. https://doi.org/10.2991/icla-18.2019.66
  23. Rabianski, J. S. (2003). Primary and Secondary Data: Concepts, Concerns, Errors, and Issues. The Appraisal Journal, 71(1), 43.
  24. Reppen, R. (1994). A genre-based approach to content writing instruction. TESOL Journal, 4(2), 32–35.
  25. Richards, J. C., Platt, J., & Platt, H. (1993). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Longman.
  26. Rofi’i, A. (2020). Model Belajar Kolaboratif untuk Meningkatkan dalam Keterampilan Menulis. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Vol. 2.
  27. Saidi, D. (2022). Implementasi model Problem Based Learning untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar bahasa Inggris siswa kelas VII semester II di SMP 21 kota Bengkulu tahun 2020/2021. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 8(5), 298–304.
  28. Saputra, H. (2020). Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah (Problem Based Learning). In Perpustakaan IAI Agus Salim (pp. 1–9).
  29. Seknun, M. F. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran. Biosel: Biology Science and Education, 2(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.33477/bs.v2i2.376
  30. Sofyan, H., & Komariah, K. (2016). Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 di SMK. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 6(3), 260–271.
  31. Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Alfabeta.
  32. Sukmadinata, N. S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Cet. 12. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  33. Sulastri, S. (2010). Peningkatan keterampilan menulis discussion text berdasarkan konsep the genre based approach pada siswa kelas XII IPA 3 SMA Negeri 1 Surakarta. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
  34. Surakhmad, W. (1986). Pengantar Interaksi Belajar Mengajar: Dasar dan Teknik Metodologi Pengajaran. Tarsito.
  35. Susanto, S., & Nanda, D. S. (2018). Teaching and Learning English for Visually Impaired Students: an Ethnographic Case Study. English Review: Journal of English Education, 7(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v7i1.1530
  36. Sya, M. F. (2015). Keterampilan Menulis Esai Naratif Bahasa Inggris Melalui Strategi Peer Review. Didaktika Tauhidi, 2(2), 97–106.
  37. Tanjung, R., Supriani, Y., Mayasari, A., & Arifudin, O. (2022). Manajemen Mutu Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan. JUrnal Pendidikan Glasser, 6(1), 29–36.
  38. Thariq, P. A., Husna, A., Aulia, E., Djusfi, A. R., Lestari, R., Fahrimal, Y., & Jhoanda, R. (2021). Sosialisasi Pentingnya Menguasai Bahasa Inggris Bagi Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat: Darma Bakti Teuku Umar, 2(2), 316–325. https://doi.org/10.35308/baktiku.v2i2.2835
  39. Trianto. (2007). Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Prestasi Pustaka.