Section Articles

PUBLIC PUNISHMENT AND SELF-DEFENSE MECHANISM ON CANING IN ACEH

zulfikar zulfikar
doktorzulfikardaud@iainlangsa.ac.id (Primary Contact)
M. Nur An Anshari

Main Article Content

Abstract

This article examines public caning in Aceh using a psychological perspective. In 2018, the issue of the pros and cons of the implementation of public caning in Aceh did not have much attention. Suddenly, the new pros and cons emerged about the venue of caning which was initially held in public (courtyard) and then was held in a prison. The pros and cons emerged when the Government of Aceh did not plan to demonstrate public caning in order to protect the dignity of a convict. Using literature sources, this article sees that a psychological perspective can be taken into account in punishment policies in Aceh. The main argument in this article is that public punishment has a long-lasting psychological impact. This finding strengthens the opinion that there are differences in the objectives of the law applied by the Aceh government with the law implemented conventionally in Indonesia.

Keywords

Public Punishment Self-Defence Caning Aceh

Article Details

How to Cite
zulfikar, zulfikar, & An Anshari, M. N. (2022). PUBLIC PUNISHMENT AND SELF-DEFENSE MECHANISM ON CANING IN ACEH. Jurisprudensi : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundangan-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 13(2), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v13i2.3713

References

  1. Abubakar, Al-Yasa’. 2013. Penerapan Syari’at Islam di Aceh (cet. 1). Banda Aceh: Dinas Syari’at Islam Aceh.
  2. Afrianty, D. (2011). Local women’s movements in Aceh and the struggle for equality and justice: The Women’s Network for Policy 1. RIMA: Review of Indonesian and Malaysian Affairs, 45(1–2), 37–68.
  3. Al-Syathiby, Al-Muwafaqat fi Ushul al-Ahkam (jilid II). Beirut: Dar al-fikr.
  4. Al-Zuhaily, Wahbah. 1424 H/2004 M. Ushul Fiqh al-Islamy. Beirut: Dar el- Fikr al-Mu’ashir.
  5. Anshari, M. Nur An. Dukungan Sosial Keluarga sebagai Upaya Pendidikan Psikologis pada Pelanggar Qanun Syari’at Islam Pasca Hukuman Cambuk di Kota Langsa, Provinsi Aceh, ANALITIKA, Vol. 9 (1) Juni 2017.
  6. Armia, M. S. 2019. Public Caning: Should it Be Maintained or Eliminated? (A Reflection of Implementation Sharia Law In Indonesia). QIJIS: Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies, 7(2), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v7i2.4974
  7. Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 1996. Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Studi tentang Bentuk-Bentuk Pidana dalam Tradisi Hukum Fiqh dan Relevansinya Bagi Usaha Pembaharuan KUHP Nasional. Bandung: Angkasa.
  8. Azwar, Syaifuddin. 2006. Sikap dan Perilaku pada Manusia. Bandung: Alfabeta. Azwar, Syaifuddin. 2013. Sikap Manusia (cet. 18). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Creswell, John W. 2015. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design. Choosing
  9. Among Five Approaches (Penelitian Kualitatif & Desain Riset: memilih di Antara Lima Pendekatan), terj. Ahmad Lintang Lazuardi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  10. Dinas Syari’at Islam Kota Langsa. 2011. Qanun Provinisi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam. Langsa.
  11. Eunike, Imaniar, Yani Talise, Sutarto Wijono, & Arianti Ina Hunga. 2016. Kebertahanan Perempuan Korban Kekerasan dalam Pacaran Di Kota Salatiga (Kajian Psikoanalisa). Jakarta: Yayasan Jurnal Perempuan.
  12. Fadlia, F., & Ramadani, I. 2018. The Qanun Jinayat Discriminates Against Women ( Victims of Rape ) in Aceh , Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, 2(2), 448–470.
  13. Febriandi, Y., Ansor, M., & Nursiti. 2021. SEEKING JUSTICE THROUGH QANUN JINAYAT: THE NARRATIVES OF FEMALE VICTIMS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN ACEH, INDONESIA. QIJIS: Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies, 9(1), 103–140.
  14. Grossmann, K. 2016. Women’s Rights Activists and the Drafting Process of the Islamic Criminal Law Code (Qanun Jinayat). In R. M. Feener, D. Kloos, & A. Samuels (Eds.), Islam and the Limits of the State: Reconfigurations of Practice, Community and Authority in Contemporary Aceh (pp. 87–117). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004304864_005
  15. Halonen, Jane S. dan Santrock, John W. 1996. Psycholgy: Contexts of Behavior. Brown & Benchmark.
  16. Hamka. 2006. Tafsir Al-Azhar (Juz XXII). Jakarta: Pustaka Panjimas.
  17. Hanafi, Ahmad. 2005. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Islam. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang. Jarvis, Matt. 2000. Theoritical Approaches in Psychology. London: Routledge.
  18. Http://Www.Britannica.Com/Topic/Flogging, accessed on 19th September 2020. Http://Dict.Hinkhoj.Com/Whipping-Meaning-In-Hindi.Words, accessed on 19th
  19. September 2020.
  20. Http://Beritakini.Co/News/Pasangan-Zina-Dan-Khalwat-Dicambuk-Di- Langsa/Index.Html, accessed on 19th September 2020.
  21. Http://Www.Harnas.Co/2018/05/15/Lapas-Meulaboh-Perdana-Eksekusi-Cambuk Http://Regional.Kompas.Com/Read/2018/04/12/20373291/Aceh-Putuskan-
  22. Lokasi-Eksekusi-Cambuk-Dipindahkan-Ke-Lapas, accessed on 19th September 2020.
  23. Http://Www.Abc.Net.Au/Indonesian/2018-04-23/Protes-Pemindahan-Hukuman- Cambuk/9686448, accessed on 19th September 2020.
  24. Http://okezone.com, 2018. Pro Kontra Eksekusi Cambuk di Dalam Lapas. http://www.google.com/amp/s/news.okezone.com/amp/2018/04/14/34, accessed on 19th September 2020.0/1886638/pro-kontra-eksekusi-cambuk- di-dalam-lapas.
  25. Http://Www.Dw.Com/En/Saudi-Arabia-Bans-Flogging-As-Punishment/A- 53241639, accessed on 25th April 2020
  26. Http://Www.Reuters.Com/Article/Us-Saudi-Rights-Flogging-Iduskcn2262vt, accessed on 24th April 2020
  27. Http://Www.Liputan6.Com/Global/Read/4238373/Bentuk-Reformasi-Hak-Asasi- Manusia-Arab-Saudi-Hapuskan-Hukuman-Cambuk, accessed on 27th April 2020
  28. Idria, R. 2016. Cultural Resistance to Shariatism in Aceh. In K. van Dijk & N. J. G. Kaptein (Eds.), Islam, Politics and Change: The Indonesian Experience after the Fall of Suharto (pp. 247–268). Leiden University Press.
  29. K. Bertens. 2006. Psikoanalisis Sigmund Freud. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  30. Peraturan Gubernur Aceh Nomor 05 Tahun 2018 tentang Pelaksanaan Acara Jinayat. Banda Aceh.
  31. Pervin, Lawrence A. dan John, Oliver P. 1997. Personality: Theory and Research
  32. (7th edition). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  33. Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat. Banda Aceh: Dinas Syari’at Islam.
  34. Qanun Aceh Nomor 7 Tahun 2013 tentang Hukum Acara Jinayat. Banda Aceh. Rakhmad, Jalaluddin. 2001. Metode Penelitian Komunikasi: Dilengkapi Contoh
  35. Salim, A. 2015. Contemporary Islamic Law in Indonesia: Sharia and Legal Pluralism. Edinburgh University Press and The Aga Khan University.
  36. S. Praja, Juhaya. 1995. Filsafat Hukum Islam. Bandung: Pusat Penerbitan Universitas LPPM Universitas Islam Bandung.
  37. Santrock, John W. 2003. Adolescence: Perkembangan Remaja (edisi keenam).
  38. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
  39. Shihab, M. Quraish. 2002. Tafsir Al-Misbah. Jakarta: Lentera Hati.
  40. Siswantoro. 2005. Metode Penelitian Sastra: Analisis Psikologi. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah Universitas Press.
  41. Zainuddin, Muslim et.al. 2011. Problematika Hukuman Cambuk di Aceh. Banda Aceh: Dinas Syari’at Islam Aceh.

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'where clause'