Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam

Legal Reasoning in Resolving Family and Inheritance Cases: A Theoretical and Practical Analysis

2026-01-02T15:10:26+08:00

Ideally, legal reasoning in family and inheritance cases should be guided by clear, consistent, and harmonized principles across the legal system. However, in reality, disputes often arise within a complex landscape involving overlapping norms, diverse interpretations, and variations in judicial practice. This research aims to analyze both the theoretical foundations and practical applications of legal reasoning used by judges and legal practitioners in resolving family and inheritance cases. Using a qualitative methodology, the study relies on doctrinal analysis, case studies, and comparative review of judicial decisions to understand how legal arguments are constructed and applied in real court settings. The findings show that although legal theory provides structured guidance, the resolution of family and inheritance disputes is largely influenced by contextual considerations such as cultural values, the coexistence of multiple legal systems, and the discretionary reasoning of judges. This dynamic interaction often leads to outcomes that balance normative frameworks with pragmatic socio-cultural realities.

The Legal Construction of Guardianship in Relation to the Temporary Suspension of Notaries: An Analysis of Article 9 Paragraph (1) Letter b of Law Number 2 of 2014

2026-01-04T14:33:55+08:00

Ideally, the regulation of guardianship in Article 9 paragraph (1) letter b of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notaries is designed to ensure that notaries possess adequate mental and professional capacity before performing their duties or being temporarily suspended. However, in reality, a normative gap exists: the definition of guardianship still relies on classical civil law, independent medical verification guidelines are absent, and administrative procedures are often subjective, risking violations of administrative justice principles. This study aims to analyze the legal construction of guardianship and to formulate a new interpretative model that integrates legal perspectives, administrative practices, and evidence-based decision medical verification. The study employs a qualitative library research methodology. Primary sources include the Notary Law, Civil Code, and legal doctrines, while secondary sources consist of scientific journals, policy reports, and contemporary psychiatric literature. Data analysis was conducted through content analysis and comparative methods, validated using literature triangulation. The findings suggest that guardianship should be assessed based on contextual functional capacity rather than normative status, allowing temporary suspension to be applied fairly, proportionally, and based on evidence, thereby enhancing the legitimacy of the Notary Law and protecting the notary profession.

Copyright Infringement in Indonesia: Applicable Sanctions and Legal Procedures

2026-01-05T08:23:10+08:00

Ideally, copyright, as part of intellectual property rights, should receive full protection from the state through firm and effective legal instruments. Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright provides a clear legal framework to ensure such protection. However, in reality, copyright infringement remains widespread in Indonesia, taking forms such as piracy, unauthorized use, and illegal distribution through digital platforms. This condition highlights a gap between the ideal legal norms and their implementation in practice. This study aims to analyze the sanctions and legal processes applicable to copyright infringement in Indonesia and evaluate the effectiveness of their implementation based on the existing laws and regulations. The methodology used in this research is a normative juridical approach, with primary data sources consisting of statutory regulations, academic literature, and relevant court decisions. The findings indicate that although Indonesia has relatively comprehensive regulations on copyright, the implementation of sanctions and legal procedures still faces obstacles, such as weak law enforcement, low public awareness, and the challenges of digitalization that facilitate the rapid spread of infringement. Therefore, a synergistic effort among policymakers, law enforcement authorities, and society is needed to build an effective and adaptive copyright protection system in response to contemporary developments.

The Influence of Digital Payment on Generation Z Consumer Behavior in the Karang Taruna Community of the Jagakarsa Area, South Jakarta

2026-01-06T08:33:24+08:00

Ideally, digital payment is utilized as an efficient, secure, and rational transaction instrument to support economic activities, particularly among Generation Z, who are widely recognized for their adaptability to digital technology. However, in practice, the ease and intensity of digital payment usage may influence consumer behavior, including increased transaction frequency and changes in consumers’ decision-making patterns. This study aims to examine the effect of digital payment on the consumer behavior of Generation Z within the Karang Taruna community in the Jagakarsa area, South Jakarta. This study employs a field research design with a quantitative approach using a survey method. Primary data were collected through structured questionnaires distributed to 69 Generation Z respondents, while secondary data were obtained from relevant scholarly literature. Data analysis was conducted using validity and reliability tests, classical assumption tests, simple linear regression analysis, and t-tests. The findings indicate that digital payment has a positive and significant effect on the consumer behavior of Generation Z. These results suggest that digital payment functions not merely as a transactional tool but also as a factor that shapes consumption patterns and behavioral dynamics within a social community context.

Normative Construction and Practical Implications of Industrial Design Disputes: A Juridical Analysis of the Geprek Bensu Case

2026-01-09T09:13:08+08:00

Ideally, legal protection for industrial designs in Indonesia consistently adheres to the first-to-file principle, in which the party who first registers their design lawfully and in good faith is entitled to exclusive legal protection. However, in reality, complex disputes arise—as seen in the Geprek Bensu case—where claims over design ownership involve interpretations that touch upon morality, business reputation, and the applicant’s intent. This study aims to analyze the normative construction and practical implications of court decisions in the industrial design dispute between PT Ayam Geprek Benny Sujono and Ruben Onsu, with an emphasis on how the first-to-file principle is applied and interpreted in Indonesian legal practice. The method used in this research is normative legal research with a qualitative-descriptive approach, based on library research of relevant laws, court rulings, and legal literature. The findings indicate that, from a juridical perspective, the Supreme Court firmly upheld the first-to-file principle as stipulated in Article 12 of Law No. 31 of 2000, and rejected claims submitted without novelty and good faith. Normatively, the ruling forms a legal construction that clarifies the standards for industrial design registration and has practical implications by encouraging business actors, particularly MSMEs, to be more proactive in registering their designs lawfully and with integrity to obtain strong legal protection.

Determinant Factors of Educational Insurance Demand among Parents in North Padang Lawas Regency

2026-01-16T07:50:33+08:00

This study aims to analyze the effects of parents’ income, consumer behavior, long-term planning preferences, perceived benefits of education insurance, and social environment on the demand for education insurance. The research adopts a quantitative approach using a survey method involving 100 respondents who are parents of school-aged children. Data were collected through Likert-scale questionnaires and analyzed using multiple linear regression with the assistance of SPSS. The partial test (t-test) results indicate that all independent variables have a positive and significant effect on the demand for education insurance. Parents’ income shows a t-value of 9.792 with a regression coefficient of 0.329 and a significance level of 0.000. Consumer behavior has a significant effect with a t-value of 4.737, a coefficient of 0.199, and a significance level of 0.000. Long-term planning preferences also demonstrate a significant effect with a t-value of 4.253, a coefficient of 0.329, and a significance level of 0.000. The perceived benefits of education insurance emerge as the most dominant variable, with a standardized beta coefficient of 0.675, a t-value of 6.422, and a significance level of 0.000. Meanwhile, the social environment has a significant effect with a t-value of 2.965, a coefficient of 0.033, and a significance level of 0.000. Simultaneously, the F-test results show an F-value of 24.614, which is greater than the F-table value of 2.31, with a significance level of 0.000, indicating that all independent variables jointly have a significant effect on the demand for education insurance. These findings suggest that the demand for education insurance is influenced by a combination of economic factors, consumer behavior, perceived benefits, long-term planning orientation, and social environment. Therefore, improving financial literacy and conducting comprehensive dissemination of the benefits of education insurance are essential to enhance public demand for education insurance.

Artificial Intelligence and Criminal Liability: Reassessing Mens Rea in the Indonesian and Global Contexts

2026-01-16T08:02:45+08:00

Ideally, criminal law ensures legal certainty and justice through the concept of mens rea, which links the offender’s mental fault to the criminal act. In reality, however, the rapid development of artificial intelligence demonstrates that AI systems may cause harmful consequences without intent, awareness, or volition comparable to those of humans, thereby challenging the anthropocentric framework of mens rea. This condition gives rise to a responsibility gap, particularly in Indonesia, where comprehensive legal regulation on AI remains limited. This study aims to re-examine the concept of mens rea in criminal law by assessing its relevance to the use of AI in both global and Indonesian contexts, while exploring the possibility of reconstructing a more adaptive model of criminal liability. This article employs library-based research with a qualitative normative approach, analyzing statutory regulations, doctrines of modern criminal law, and literature on Islamic law. The findings indicate that mens rea is not abandoned but requires reconstruction through systemic, risk-based approaches and corporate criminal liability, which are consistent with the principle of maslahah and harm prevention in Islamic law, in order to safeguard substantive justice in the digital era.