Article Sidebar

Submitted
Dec 26, 2024
Accepted
Jan 29, 2025
Published
Jan 29, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 43 Download : 22

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the falsification of authentic data in court proceedings from the perspectives of positive law and Islamic criminal law, focusing on the conformity of legal norms and the sanctions applied. This article falls under library research with a qualitative approach. The methodology used includes normative legal studies and comparative studies. The findings reveal that, in Indonesian positive law, the falsification of authentic data is regulated under the Criminal Code (KUHP) with strict criminal sanctions, while in Islamic criminal law, such actions are categorized as crimes that undermine the principles of justice, with ta'zir sanctions adjusted to the severity of the violation. This study emphasizes the importance of enforcing fair laws to maintain the integrity of the judicial system.

Keywords

Falsification Authentic Data Court Proceedings

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Lase, S. W., & Ramadani, R. (2025). Analisis Hukum terhadap Pemalsuan Data Otentik di Persidangan: Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Pidana Islam. Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 10(1), 52-66. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v9i1.10528

References

  1. Al-Khatib, Mahmoud A. “The Concept of Justice in Islam: A Socio-Pragmatic Analysis.” Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies 10, no. 5 (2023): 45–66.
  2. Arafah, Intan Arafah Intan. “Pendekatan Sadd Adz-Dzari’ah Dalam Studi Islam.” Al-Muamalat: Jurnal Hukum Dan Ekonomi Syariah 5, no. 1 (September 26, 2020): 68–86.
  3. Awwalia, Dini, Eva Shofia Fitriati, and Muhammad Haris. “Digitalisasi Dalam Pembuatan Dan Penyimpanan Akta Notaris Pada Era Society 5.0.” Falah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 5, no. 2 (December 26, 2023): 46–58. https://doi.org/10.55510/fjhes.v5i2.239.
  4. Baur, Nina, Peter Graeff, Lilli Braunisch, and Malte Schweia. “The Quality of Big Data. Development, Problems, and Possibilities of Use of Process-Generated Data in the Digital Age.” Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung 45, no. 3 (2020): 209–43.
  5. Darmawan, Ronaldo, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi, and Ni Made Sukariyati Karma. “Perbandingan Kekuatan Hukum Alat Bukti Otentik Dan Perjanjian Bawah Tangan (Studi Kasus Perkara Nomor: 939/Pdt.G/2018/PN Dps).” Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum 2, no. 1 (March 26, 2021): 132–36. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.2.1.3085.132-136.
  6. Dewa, Muhammad Jufri, La Sensu, Oheo Kaimuddin Haris, Guasman Tatawu, Muhammad Sabarudin Sinapoy, and F. Guntur Sunoto. “Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Pejabat Kepolisian Dalam Penerimaan Anggota Polri.” Halu Oleo Legal Research 5, no. 1 (April 20, 2023): 143–56. https://doi.org/10.33772/holresch.v5i1.226.
  7. Fakhiryah, Vany Nur. “Tindak Pidana Memasukkan Keterangan Palsu ke Dalam Akta Otentik dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana di Indonesia (Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 602 K/PID/2016).” Jurnal Hukum Media Justitia Nusantara 10, no. 2 (2020): 35–56. https://doi.org/10.30999/mjn.v10i2.1909.
  8. Hasibuan, Kalijunjung, Haniyah, Bambang Sasmita Adi Putra, Hamzah Mardiansyah, and Rengga Kusuma Putra. “Konsekuensi Hukum Terhadap Kesaksian Palsu Dalam Persidangan.” Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains 7, no. 9 (September 25, 2024): 3476–79. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v7i9.6035.
  9. Hasrul, Hasrul, Syahruddin Nawi, and Ilham Abbas. “Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Menempatkan Keterangan Palsu Dalam Akta Otentik.” JLP: Journal of Lex Philosophy 3, no. 2 (December 30, 2022): 312–27. https://doi.org/10.52103/jlp.v3i2.1474.
  10. Husaini, Husaini. “Tinjauan Yuridis Pemalsuan Data Otentik Dalam Proses Balik Nama Sertifikat Hak Milik Yang Mengakibatkan Kerugian (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 45 K/Pid/2019).” Jurnal Hukum Al-Hikmah: Media Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum Dan Masyarakat 2, no. 4 (December 1, 2021): 789–804. https://doi.org/10.30743/jhah.v1i1.4638.
  11. Iryadi, Irfan. “Kedudukan Akta Otentik Dalam Hubungannya Dengan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara.” Jurnal Konstitusi 15, no. 4 (2018): 796–815. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1546.
  12. Ismail, Wan Abdul Fattah Wan, Ahmad Syukran Baharuddin, Lukman Abdul Mutalib, and Muneer Ali Abdul Rab al-Qubaty. “Document Falsification/Forgery from the View of Islamic Jurisprudence and Malaysian Law.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 57, no. 2 (December 24, 2019): 459–98. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2019.572.459-498.
  13. Kurniawan, Aldian Megy. “Studi Komparasi Sanksi Pidana Pelaku Pemalsuan Buku Nikah Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam Dan Hukum Pidana Positif.” Jurnal Mahupas 2, no. 02 (2023): 1–19.
  14. Munthe, Cinta Rohaini, Fadwa Nabilah, Liza Aulia Br Manurung, Mala Purnawati, and Nursumayyah Damanik. “Etika Akademis Dalam Perspektif Surat Al-Baqarah Ayat 42 Dan Kaitannya Dengan Asbabun Nuzul.” Sulawesi Tenggara Educational Journal 4, no. 3 (2024): 203–7. https://doi.org/10.54297/seduj.v4i3.851.
  15. Nurfadillah, Ahmad Rizki. “Sanksi Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Akta Otentik Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam.” Jurnal Al-Jina’i Al-Islami 1, no. 2 (June 29, 2024): 81–92. https://doi.org/10.15575/jaa.v1i2.457.
  16. Rizqiya, Anis, and Muh Afif Mahfud. “Perkembangan Cyber Notary di Indonesia dan Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Notaris dalam Era Digital.” Notarius 17, no. 3 (December 31, 2024): 2430–48. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v17i3.65792.
  17. Sa’it, Abu, Amiruddin, and Ufran. “Menyuruh Memasukkan Keterangan Palsu Dalam Akta Autentik.” Jurnal Education and Development 9, no. 4 (November 5, 2021): 773–76.
  18. Suryanto, Jane Patricia. “Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Akta Otentik oleh Notaris: Studi Kasus No. 146 K/PID/2015.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 3 (March 10, 2024): 8095–8104. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1689.
  19. Syamsiah, Siti, and Widya Tri Mawarni. “Menggapai Keberkahan Hidup Dengan Jujur Dalam Muamalah.” Hibrul Ulama 5, no. 2 (July 6, 2023): 68–75. https://doi.org/10.47662/hibrululama.v5i2.518.
  20. Tanzilla, Shahnaz, Muhammad Firdaus, Zainal Muttaqin, Muhammad Riza Muarrif, and Salman Salman. “The Practice of Renting iPhones as Pawned Objects: An Islamic Law and Civil Code Perspective.” AJIL: Aceh Journal of Islamic Law 2, no. 1 (January 12, 2025): 1–17.
  21. Zulaiha, Eni. “Prophet Muhammad’s Communication Strategy Perspective of Tafsir Maudu’i al- Wajiz.” International Journal of Nusantara Islam 12, no. 1 (September 3, 2024): 76–88. https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v12i1.31073.