Article Sidebar

Submitted
Aug 2, 2024
Accepted
Aug 14, 2024
Published
Aug 15, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 165 Download : 251

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Sexual violence, which includes actions that demean or attack an individual's body and reproductive functions, causes profound physical and psychological suffering and hinders victims' access to education and healthcare. Ideally, restitution aims to compensate victims for both material and immaterial losses, as stipulated in Law No. 31 of 2014, Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2022, and Law No. 12 of 2022. However, in practice, many restitution cases are not effectively implemented due to the financial incapacity of the perpetrators. This study uses a juridical-empirical method to evaluate the restitution mechanism at the LPSK Representative Office in Medan and assess the restitution system from the perspectives of Criminal Law and Islamic Criminal Law. The research findings indicate that from the perspective of Criminal Law, the restitution system faces major challenges due to the inability of perpetrators to meet their payment obligations, despite adequate regulations and procedures. From the perspective of Islamic Criminal Law, the restoration of victims' rights, known as mahr mitsil or diyat, offers a restorative approach that can complement the restitution system by emphasizing the perpetrator's responsibility to fairly compensate for the losses. This study highlights the need for adjustments in the restitution procedure and detailed evaluation of the perpetrators' financial capacity to enhance the effectiveness of the restitution system.

Keywords

Restitution Sexual Violence LPSK Medan

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Mustika, V., & Iwan. (2024). Restitusi Terhadap Korban Kekerasan Seksual di LPSK Medan; Analisis Hukum Pidana Dan Hukum Pidana Islam. Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 9(2), 117-131. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v9i2.9224

References

  1. Adam, Panji. “Eksistensi Sanksi Pidana Penjara Dalam Jarîmah Ta’zîr.” Tahkim (Jurnal Peradaban Dan Hukum Islam) 2, no. 2 (October 25, 2019): 39–66. https://doi.org/10.29313/tahkim.v2i2.5114.
  2. Alyafedri, Youfan, and Ismail Koto. “Kebijakan Hukum Terhadap Problematika Pemberian Pemenuhan Hak Restitusi Korban Tindak Pidana Yang Diatur KUHAP Dan Diluar KUHAP.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 4 (July 24, 2024): 11643–53. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2006.
  3. Goklas, Christian, and Beniharmoni Harefa. “Optimalisasi Peran Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban (LPSK) Dalam Membantu Pemberian Restitusi Pada Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Anak Di Indonesia.” JUSTITIA; Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora 8, no. 5 (November 1, 2021): 892–905. https://doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v8i5.892-905.
  4. Hasibuan, Lidya Rahmadani. “Hak Restitusi Terhadap Korban Anak Berdasarkan Undang Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undangn Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 Tentang Perlindungan Anak Di Belawan.” Jurnal Hukum Responsif 7, no. 2 (December 31, 2019): 30–39.
  5. Kifli, Susiana, and Atika Ismail. “Analisis Hak Korban Korban Kekerasan Seksual Dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Penghapusan Kekerasan Seksual Dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Wajah Hukum 6, no. 2 (October 14, 2022): 462–70. https://doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v6i2.1093.
  6. Lubis, Syahrizal Efendi. “Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak Di Kota Medan UU RI No. 23 Tahun 2002 Dan UU No. 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perlindungan Anak.” Jurnal Ilmiah Maksitek 6, no. 1 (March 26, 2021): 58–68.
  7. Panjaitan, Clasina Mutiara Juwita, and Ariyani Putri. “Peran Dari Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban (LPSK) Dalam Pemerkosaan.” Recidive: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan 2, no. 1 (April 1, 2013): 87–92. https://doi.org/10.20961/recidive.v2i1.32018.
  8. Rahmi, Atikah. “Pemenuhan Restitusi Dan Kompensasi Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Bagi Korban Kejahatan Seksual Dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia.” DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 2 (July 2, 2019): 140–59. https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v4i2.3173.
  9. Rahmi, Elda Maisy, Ali Abu Bakar, and Suhaimi Suhaimi. “Pelaksanaan ‘Uqubat Restitusi terhadap Korban Perkosaan.” Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 21, no. 2 (August 29, 2019): 227–40. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v21i2.11317.
  10. Rambey, Guntur. “Diyat Sebagai Sanksi Hukum Pembunuhan Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam.” EduTech: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial 1, no. 02 (September 8, 2015). https://doi.org/10.30596/edutech.v1i02.584.
  11. Shaqila, Faza, Marlina, and Rafiqoh Lubis. “Hak Restitusi Terhadap Anak Korban Tindak Pidana Dan Implementasinya Dalam Putusan Hakim.” Neoclassical Legal Review: Journal of Law and Contemporary Issues 2, no. 2 (November 25, 2023): 11–18. https://doi.org/10.32734/nlr.v2i2.11520.
  12. Sugiharto, Ade Firmansyah, and Michael Ganda. “Implementasi Prinsip Keadilan Restoratif Terhadap Korban Pemerkosaan Sebagai Pemulihan Hak Atas Kesehatan.” eJournal Kedokteran Indonesia 12, no. 1 (May 14, 2024): 103–103. https://doi.org/10.23886/ejki.12.645.103.
  13. Wardhani, Devita Wisnu, and Burham Pranawa. “Implementasi Restitusi Terhadap Kekerasan Seksual Kepada Anak Menurut Hukum Positif di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi 11, no. 2 (December 31, 2023): 242–49. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v11i2.71862.
  14. Wijaya, Irawan Adi, and Hari Purwadi. “Pemberian Restitusi Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Korban Tindak Pidana.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi 6, no. 2 (February 1, 2018): 93–103. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v6i2.17728.