Article Sidebar

Submitted
Aug 6, 2024
Accepted
Aug 28, 2024
Published
Aug 29, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 98 Download : 100

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The issue of corruption eradication in Indonesia is evident from the weak legal protection for Justice Collaborators and Whistleblowers. Although they play a vital role in exposing corruption crimes, the reality is that many of them face physical threats, psychological pressure, and intimidation, which hinder the effectiveness of law enforcement. This study aims to analyze the urgency of legal protection and understand the factors that motivate individuals to become Justice Collaborators or Whistleblowers in the context of corruption crimes in Indonesia. This research employs legal research methods with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The findings conclude that the urgency of legal protection is crucial to ensuring the safety and active participation of Justice Collaborators and Whistleblowers in uncovering corruption cases. Moreover, their motivation is influenced by moral drives, social responsibility, and legal incentives that encourage the courage to report or testify, even when faced with significant risks.


Urgency, Motivation, Justice Collaborator, Whistleblower

Keywords

Urgency Motivation Justice Collaborator Whistleblower

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Dwiyanti, A., & Djabbar, A. (2024). Urgensi dan Motivasi; Perlindungan Hukum bagi Justice Collaborator dan Whistleblower dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 9(2), 132-147. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v9i2.9251

References

  1. Aulia, Wahdina, and Irwansyah Irwansyah. “Perlindungan HAM Bagi Saksi Pelaku Yang Bekerja Sama Dalam Memberi Keterangan (Justice Collaborator) Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Educatio: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia 9, no. 1 (June 30, 2023): 582–89. https://doi.org/10.29210/1202323111.
  2. Dwiasty, Refniayu, Mulyati Pawennei, and Baharuddin Badaru. “Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Perlindungan Justice Collaborator Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP) 5, no. 1 (March 7, 2024): 69–82.
  3. Eno, La Radi, Tarmudi Tarmudi, and Oswin Sedekiel Malinim. “Kedudukan Hukum Justice Collaborator Pada Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 1273/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Plg.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis 12, no. 04 (August 21, 2023): 200–207. https://doi.org/10.47709/jhb.v12i04.2750.
  4. Fauzi, Muhammad Rizky, Danik Adila Putri, and Dita Puspitasari. “Perbandingan Model Perlindungan Hukum Whistle Blower Dan Justice Collaborator Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana Antara Negara Indonesia Dan Albania.” Verstek 2, no. 2 (January 10, 2020): 22–40. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v2i2.38852.
  5. Gultom, Laura Naomi Rotua. “Studi Komparatif Antara Justice Collaborator Dengan Whistleblower Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Corruptio 1, no. 2 (November 10, 2020): 129–42. https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio.v1i2.2099.
  6. Huda, Muhammad Chairul, and Budi Ispriyarso. “Contribution of Islamic Law in the Discretionary Scheme That has Implications for Corruption.” Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan 19, no. 2 (December 31, 2019): 147–67. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v19i2.147-167.
  7. Lesmana, Iwan, Dheny Biantara, and Meco Sitardja. “Faktor Motivasi Dan Indikator Ekonomi Dalam Uji Kelayakan Justice Collaborator.” Indonesian Journal of Accounting and Governance 5, no. 1 (July 31, 2021): 47–57. https://doi.org/10.36766/ijag.v5i1.181.
  8. Mahmud, Bahrudin, Muhammad Junaidi, Amri Panahatan Sihotang, and Soegianto Soegianto. “Reposisi Kedudukan Justice Collaborator Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal USM Law Review 4, no. 1 (June 18, 2021): 362–77. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v4i1.3368.
  9. Majid, Jamaluddin, Bustan Ramli, Fatahillah R, Riza Praditha, Zainal Abidin Abidin, and Andi Yusril Cibu Cibu. “Motivasi Whistleblower: Mengungkap Fraud Keuangan Daerah Dalam Konsep Amar Ma’ruf Nahi Mungkar.” Journal of Finance and Business Digital 1, no. 1 (September 23, 2022): 39–54. https://doi.org/10.55927/jfbd.v1i1.1212.
  10. Muhammad, Rusli. “Pengaturan Dan Urgensi Whistle Blower Dan Justice Collaborator Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 22, no. 2 (2015): 203–22. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol22.iss2.art2.
  11. Mulyadi, Lilik. “Menggagas Konsep Dan Model Ideal Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Whistleblower Dan Justice Collaborator Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Organized Crime di Indonesia Masa Mendatang.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 3, no. 2 (July 31, 2014): 101–16. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.3.2.2014.101-116.
  12. Nayır, Dilek Zamantılı, Michael T. Rehg, and Yurdanur Asa. “Influence of Ethical Position on Whistleblowing Behaviour: Do Preferred Channels in Private and Public Sectors Differ?” Journal of Business Ethics 149, no. 1 (2018): 147–67.
  13. Pratama, Bagus Diyan, and Budiarsih Budiarsih. “Analisis Kebijakan Kedudukan Justice Collaborator Dan Whistleblower Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance 3, no. 1 (2023): 313–27. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i1.183.
  14. Puluhulawa, Mohamad Danial, Fenty U. Puluhulawa, and Dian Ekawaty Ismail. “Anotasi Perlindungan Hukum Wistleblower dan Justice Collaborator dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Al Ahkam 16, no. 2 (December 18, 2020): 56–74. https://doi.org/10.37035/ajh.v16i2.2725.
  15. Rahman, Mustafa A. “The Discursive Construction of Strategies for Implementing Anti-Corruption Education at State Islamic Higher Educational Institutions.” Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun 10, no. 3 (September 30, 2022): 555–78. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v10i3.737.
  16. Rasyid, Arbanur. “Kesaksian Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Jurnal El-Qanuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan Dan Pranata Sosial 6, no. 1 (October 5, 2020): 29–41. https://doi.org/10.24952/el-qanuniy.v6i1.2442.
  17. Rios-Fígueroa, Julio. “Justice System Institutions and Corruption Control: Evidence from Latin America.” The Justice System Journal 33, no. 2 (2012): 195–214.
  18. Setiawan, M. Adi, and Yeni Widowaty. “Justice Collaborator Implementation with Law Effectively Approaches in Indonesia.” Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum 23, no. 1 (July 23, 2024): 554–69. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i1.3714.
  19. Sirait, Adi Syahputra. “Kedudukan Dan Efektivitas Justice Collaborator Di Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana.” Jurnal El-Qanuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan Dan Pranata Sosial 5, no. 2 (2019): 241–56. https://doi.org/10.24952/el-qonuniy.v5i2.2148.
  20. Sutedjo, Paulina, and Vena Purnamasari. “Dampak Keseriusan Masalah, Risiko Bagi Pelapor, dan Status Pelanggar terhadap Niat Whistleblowing.” Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan 8, no. 3 (December 7, 2020): 489–502. https://doi.org/10.17509/jrak.v8i3.26226.
  21. Suyatna, Uyat. “Evaluasi Kebijakan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia.” Sosiohumaniora 22, no. 3 (November 7, 2020): 325–33. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v22i3.25047.