Article Sidebar

Submitted
Aug 21, 2024
Accepted
Sep 17, 2024
Published
Sep 21, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 54 Download : 74

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Should be, the principle of Ultimum Remedium should be applied in the enforcement of law against crimes committed by children; however, in reality, in Decision Number: 9/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/Pn Plg, this principle was not optimally implemented. This inconsistency raises issues regarding the ideal legal protection for children as offenders, particularly in cases of sexual offenses. A harsher treatment than expected can impact the psychological well-being of the child and undermine the more humane rehabilitation goals within the juvenile justice system. This study aims to analyze the enforcement of law regarding sexual offenses committed by children and to assess the basis for the judge's considerations in rendering a decision based on the principle of Ultimum Remedium. The methodology used is normative legal research with a case approach, where the primary data is derived from the Palembang District Court Decision Number: 9/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/Pn Plg, supported by secondary and tertiary legal materials that are analyzed qualitatively. The research findings indicate that the law enforcement in this case imposed a prison sentence of 4 years along with a fine of Rp 50,000,000, with an alternative of 3 months of vocational training. In the judge's considerations, the basis cited was Article 81 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 76 D of the Child Protection Law, emphasizing both juridical and non-juridical aspects, although the application of the Ultimum Remedium principle was not enforced due to various aggravating factors.

Keywords

Criminal Prosecution Child Ultimum Remedium

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Widadi, S., Zainuddin, C., & Martini. (2024). Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan yang Dilakukan oleh Anak; Analisis Penegakan Hukum Berdasarkan Asas Ultimum Remedium. Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 9(2), 185-201. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v9i2.9311

References

  1. Anwar, Mashuril, and M. Ridho Wijaya. “Fungsionalisasi Dan Implikasi Asas Kepentingan Terbaik Bagi Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum: Studi Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Tanjung Karang.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 2 (2019): 265–92. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.2.2.265-292.
  2. Aprilianda, Nurini. “Pidana Pelatihan Kerja Pengganti Denda Yang Berkemanfaatan Dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Anak.” Rechtidee 15, no. 1 (June 17, 2020): 57–71. https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v15i1.6890.
  3. Bagaskoro, Ladito, Ardi Ferdian, Ridayani, Muhamad Romdoni, Febrianika Maharani, Ahdiyatul Hidayah, Celine Sitanggang, et al. Perkembangan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Serang-Banten: Sada Kurnia Pustaka, 2023.
  4. Blackwood, Evelyn. “Regulation of Sexuality in Indonesian Discourse: Normative Gender, Criminal Law and Shifting Strategies of Control.” Culture, Health & Sexuality 9, no. 3 (May 1, 2007): 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050601120589.
  5. Fachri, Muhammad, Kamal Hidjza, and Ilham Abbas. “Efektivitas Penjatuhan Pidana Kepada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Terhadap Anak.” Journal of Lex Theory (JLT) 4, no. 2 (December 30, 2023): 213–24.
  6. Fithri, Beby Suryani. “Asas Ultimum Remedium Terhadap Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum Dalam Rangka Perlindungan Anak.” Jurnal Mercatoria 10, no. 1 (June 1, 2017): 74–88. https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v10i1.733.
  7. Fitri, Sheila Maulida. “Eksistensi Penerapan Ultimum Remedium dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” de Jure Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 1 (December 12, 2020): 16–27. https://doi.org/10.33387/dejure.v2i1.2688.
  8. Januardi, Rusdi Salam, Puspita Adiyansari, Nova Rinda Dien, and Ridlo Laksono. “Analisis Yuridis Pengajuan Kasasi Dalam Perkara Persetubuhan Dengan Anak Di Bawah Umur.” Verstek 2, no. 2 (January 10, 2020). https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v2i2.38861.
  9. Kennedy, Arravi Agustian, Yantri Maputra, and Dwi Puspasari. “Orientasi Masa Depan Pada Remaja Pelaku Tindak Pidana.” Psycho Idea 18, no. 1 (March 2, 2020): 63–73. https://doi.org/10.30595/psychoidea.v18i1.5965.
  10. Kirana, Citra, and Dwi Alfianto. “Analisis Putusan Nomor 9/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/PN Jkt.Brt tentang Dakwaan Pidana Persetubuhan oleh Anak terhadap Anak.” Reformasi Hukum Trisakti 6, no. 3 (August 30, 2024): 1304–13. https://doi.org/10.25105/refor.v6i3.21127.
  11. Mniber, Emilia Kristine Oktavia. “Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Anak Dibawah Umur Wilayah Hukum Biak Numfor.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren 3, no. 1 (July 30, 2021): 21–33. https://doi.org/10.46924/jihk.v3i1.146.
  12. Mutiarani, Salma, and Subekti. “Pembinaan Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Di Yayasan Pembinaan Anak Nakal Bhina Putera.” Recidive: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan 11, no. 1 (November 18, 2022): 100–106. https://doi.org/10.20961/recidive.v11i1.67441.
  13. Noviardi, Jeki, Fitriati Fitriati, and Herman Bakir. “Penerapan Unsur Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Terhadap Anak Yang Disebarkan Melalui Media Sosial Pada Penyidikan.” Unes Journal of Swara Justisia 5, no. 3 (October 29, 2021): 259–66. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v5i3.223.
  14. Perangin-angin, Bahtera, Bunyamin Alamsyah, and M. Zen Abdullah. “Peranan Hakim Dalam Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 Di Wilayah Pengadilan Negeri Jambi.” Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 2 (May 12, 2017): 206–50. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v6i2.122.
  15. Prasetya, Arif Agung. “Penerapan Asas Ultimum Remedium pada Anak Berkonflik dengan Hukum yang Menjadi Perantara Jual Beli Narkotika.” Jurnal Juristic 2, no. 03 (December 30, 2021): 338–50. https://doi.org/10.35973/jrs.v2i03.2668.
  16. Reisasari, Mirta Diatri. “Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana Pelatihan Kerja Terhadap Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) 1, no. 1 (July 27, 2020): 10–19. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v1i1.9154.
  17. Setiawan, Endrianto Bayu, Lintang Charahena Mustofa, Tia Rizki Febrianti, and Luvieandra Pratama. “The Indonesian Criminal Law System’s Progression in Sexual Assaults Regulation.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi 5, no. 2 (December 17, 2022): 161–77. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v5i2.6690.
  18. Siadari, Hamidah, Nur Rochaeti, and Bambang Dwi Baskoro. “Arti Penting Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Perkosaan.” Diponegoro Law Journal 5, no. 3 (July 13, 2016): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2016.12573.
  19. Simanjuntak, Immanuel, Angelica Florencia C. Zega, Daniel Gidion Tambunan, Aisyah Aisyah, and Azwir Agus. “Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Pada Kasus Persetubuhan Anak di Bawah Umur (Studi Putusan: Nomor 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN PRN).” Jurnal Rectum: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana 5, no. 2 (July 16, 2023): 164–74. https://doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v5i2.3500.
  20. Siregar, Khairani Aisya Amira, Dona Raisa Monica, and Emilia Susanti. “Analisis Penerapan Asas Ultimum Remedium Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan: Studi Putusan Nomor: 15/Pid.Sus Anak/2022/PT.Sby.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia 4, no. 1 (July 9, 2024): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v4i1.3006.
  21. Sitompul, Rina Melati, and Andi Maysarah. “Ultimum Remedium Principles in Criminal Decisions in Creating Restorative Justice.” JCH; Jurnal Cendekia Hukum 7, no. 1 (September 30, 2021): 32–46. https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v7i1.324.
  22. Widyawati, Mega. “Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Pada Anak Ditinjau Dari Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam.” Jurnal USM Law Review 1, no. 1 (May 20, 2020): 68–81. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v1i1.2232.