Article Sidebar

Submitted
Nov 17, 2024
Accepted
Nov 29, 2024
Published
Nov 30, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 30 Download : 11

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Ideally, conflicts are resolved through legal channels that uphold justice. However, in reality, the Madurese community often resorts to the tradition of carok, particularly in cases involving honor, which frequently result in fatalities. This raises legal issues, especially regarding criminal accountability for carok perpetrators under both state law and Islamic law. This study aims to analyze the carok tradition, which leads to death, from the perspective of Islamic criminal law, including criminal accountability, the application of Islamic law to carok, and specific conditions where carok is committed out of necessity or self-defense. This article is a library-based study with a juridical-normative approach. The methodology employed is descriptive-analytical. The findings reveal that carok perpetrators are criminally responsible for their actions that cause death. In Islamic law, carok is categorized as an act of murder with specific sanctions, except when it is carried out in self-defense or in defense of one's family.

Keywords

Carok Tradition Criminal Law Madura

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Syaputra, M. I., & Ishaq, I. (2024). Budaya Carok Masyarakat Madura dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam. Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 9(2), 202-218. https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v9i2.9835

References

  1. Abdurrahman, Abdurrahman. “Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Dengan Carok Melalui Mediasi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam: Studi Kasus Di Desa Lepelle Sampang Madura.” UIN Sunan Ampel, 2017.
  2. Afif, Muhammad. “Dikotomi Pidana Mati Sebagai Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia Menurut Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Pidana Islam.” Jurnal Gagasan Hukum 3, no. 01 (August 12, 2021): 15–33. https://doi.org/10.31849/jgh.v3i01.7500.
  3. Arianto, Henry, and Krishna Krishna. “Tradisi Carok pada Masyarakat Adat Madura.” Forum Ilmiah 8, no. 02 (2011): 146–55. https://ejurnal.esaunggul.ac.id/index.php/Formil/article/view/772.
  4. Cahyono, Cahyono. “The Model of Penal Mediation as a Countermeasure of Violent Conflict (Carok) in Madurese Society Based on Local Wisdom.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 8, no. 2 (July 31, 2019): 275–96. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.8.2.2019.275-296.
  5. Cotton, Michele. “The Necessity Defense and the Moral Limits of Law.” New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 18, no. 1 (2015): 35–70. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2015.18.1.35.
  6. Firdaus, Sendy Pratama, Muhammad Ghifari Fardhana Bahar, and Basri Muhammad Ridwan Sangadji. “Menilik Budaya Carok pada Masyarakat Madura dalam Sistem Hukum Adat di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 2, no. 3 (March 13, 2021): 236–48. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v2i3.45.
  7. Gantara, Gilang Eksa, Fiqriadi, and Muhammad Suaidi Yusuf. “Relevansi Kisah Nabi Musa Dan Fir’aun Menurut Al-Qur’an Dengan Islamofobia.” Izzatuna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir 4, no. 2 (December 31, 2023): 9–25. https://doi.org/10.62109/ijiat.v4i2.44.
  8. Hafida, Melina Nur, Daya Negri Wijaya, Dewa Agung Gede Agung, and Aditya Nugroho Widiadi. “Kajian Historis Carok Di Madura Pada Masa Kolonialisme Belanda.” Agastya: Jurnal Sejarah Dan Pembelajarannya 14, no. 1 (January 31, 2024): 29–38. https://doi.org/10.25273/ajsp.v14i1.18568.
  9. Handayani, Emy, and Fatih Misbah. “Carok: ‘Di Persimpangan’ Budaya dan Hukum Positif.” Crepido 1, no. 1 (July 31, 2019): 23–31. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.23-31.
  10. Haris, Haris, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, and Muhammad Nur. “Understanding Carok in Madura: Legal Reform from Criminal Law and Islamic Law Perspective.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 5, no. 2 (April 30, 2024): 613–32. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.vol5i2.3921.
  11. Hariyanto, Erie Hariyanto Erie. “Carok vs Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Proses Transformasi Budaya Madura Ke Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia).” Karsa; Journal of Social and Islamic Culture 12, no. 2 (2007): 168–79. https://doi.org/10.19105/karsa.v12i2.141.
  12. Hartanto, Hartanto, Rico Agung Satria Atmaja, Suyikati, and Arvita Hastarini. “Adat (Budaya) Carok Dalam Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia.” Literasi Hukum 8, no. 1 (June 1, 2024): 27–44. https://doi.org/10.31002/lh.v8i1.1522.
  13. Ikmal, Moh, and Mohammad Arifin. “Anarkisme Politik di Aras Lokal (Peran ‘Bandit’ Politik dalam Pilkades Di Kabupaten Sumenep).” Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Pemerintahan 6, no. 2 (October 31, 2020): 123–52. https://doi.org/10.37058/jipp.v6i2.2219.
  14. Ismail, Ismai, and Moh Wardi. “Peran Kiai Dalam Rekonsiliasi Sosial Pasca Carok Massal Di Bujur Tengah Pamekasan Madura.” Ibda’: Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Budaya 17, no. 1 (July 25, 2019): 128–52. https://doi.org/10.24090/ibda.v17i1.2678.
  15. Ismail, Siti Zubaidah. “The Modern Interpretation of the Diyat Formula for the Quantum of Damages: The Case of Homicide and Personal Injuries.” Arab Law Quarterly 26, no. 3 (2012): 361–79. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23235577.
  16. Jamila, Siti. “Carok Dalam Kontestasi Pemilihan Kepala Desa: Studi Kasus Pilkades Bator Kecamatan Klampis Kabupaten Bangkalan 2023.” Doctoral, Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya Universty, 2024. https://doi.org/10/NEW%20TESIS%20SITI%20SIAP%20UJIAN.pdf.
  17. Jayanti, Mita Dwi. “Pembahasan Mengenai Masalah Carok Sebagai Suatu Perbuatan Pidana.” Justice Pro: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 2 (December 30, 2020): 63–68. https://doi.org/10.53027/jp.v4i2.184.
  18. Mahmudi, Mahmudi. “Putusan Hakim Di Pengadilan Negeri Sampang Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Yang Berlatar Belakang Carok.” Brawijaya Law Student Journal 1, no. 1 (September 15, 2015): 1–17. https://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/1341.
  19. Mustikajati, Aina Aurora, Alif Rizqi Ramadhan, and Riska Andi Fitriono. “Tradisi Carok Adat Madura Dalam Perspektif Kriminologi Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Menggunakan Prinsip Restorative Justice.” Jurnal Ekonomi, Sosial & Humaniora 3, no. 04 (November 27, 2021): 95–107. https://www.jurnalintelektiva.com/index.php/jurnal/article/view/650.
  20. Rambe, Ahmad Razaki, and Zaid Alfauza Marpaung. “Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Tidak Sengaja Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam (Analisis Terhadap Konsep Restorative Justice).” Jurnal Legisia 16, no. 1 (January 31, 2024): 71–85. https://doi.org/10.58350/leg.v16i1.487.
  21. Rambey, Guntur. “Diyat Sebagai Sanksi Hukum Pembunuhan Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam.” EduTech: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial 1, no. 02 (September 8, 2015): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.30596/edutech.v1i02.584.
  22. Salim, Pebri. “Diyat Berdasarkan Gender Sebagai Pengganti Qishas Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Analisis Hukum Pidana Islam).” Al-Qanun: Jurnal Kajian Sosial dan Hukum Islam 1, no. 4 (December 29, 2020): 416–33. https://doi.org/10.58836/al-qanun.v1i4.8423.
  23. Sandi, Abdullah, Kasman Bakry, and Jamaluddin Jamaluddin. “Pembunuhan Sebagai Upaya Pembelaan Diri Dalam Pandangan Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif.” Al-Qiblah: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Bahasa Arab 3, no. 4 (July 25, 2024): 694–712. https://doi.org/10.36701/qiblah.v3i4.1666.
  24. Sitompul, Rina Melati, and Andi Maysarah. “Ultimum Remedium Principles in Criminal Decisions in Creating Restorative Justice.” JCH; Jurnal Cendekia Hukum 7, no. 1 (September 30, 2021): 32–46. https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v7i1.324.
  25. Tanzillah, Eriska Nur, and Maharani Nurdin. “Tinjauan Yuridis Sosiologis Atas Tindak Pidana Budaya Carok Berdasarkan Pasal 340 KUHP.” Pagaruyuang Law Journal 5, no. 1 (August 25, 2021): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.31869/plj.v5i1.2825.