Article Sidebar

Submitted
Dec 1, 2021
Accepted
Jan 28, 2022
Published
Feb 6, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 305 Download : 898

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The history of the positiveization of Islamic civil law was carried out by the Ottoman Government in enforcing the Islamic Civil Code which consisted of 1851 articles. On the other hand, the "positivization" of Islamic civil law is the realization of the dream of Muslims since ancient times, during the Dutch East Indies government the Civil Code (KUHPerdata) was still applied, which was a translation of the Dutch Colonial Borgelijk Wetbook (BW). For now, the positiveization of Sharia Economic Law has become a necessity for Muslims, considering the practice of sharia economics has been increasingly developed through Sharia Financial Institutions. The compilation is then used as a reference in the settlement of sharia economic cases which are increasing day by day, along with the development of the Islamic Financial Institution as well. This paper seeks to examine Sharia Economic Law, Civil Law, Sharia Economic Law Materials in Civil Law and Efforts to Positivity Sharia Economic Law in Indonesia.

Article Details

How to Cite
M. Irsyad Arifin, M. I. (2022). Eksistensi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Dalam Hukum Perdata. Lentera, 3(2), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.32505/lentera.v3i2.3536

References

  1. Ahmad, K. (1983). Studies in Islamic Economics. Leicester: The Islamic Foundation.
  2. Ali, M. D. (1993). Hukum Islam, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum di Indonesia (Cetakan ke). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Rosada.
  3. Antonio, M. S. (2009). Bank Syariah: Dari Teori ke Praktek (Cetakan ke). Jakarta: Gema Insani.
  4. Anwar, S. (2002). Pengembangan Metode Penelitian Hukum Islam (Cetakn ke-). Yogyakarta: Penerbit ar-Ruzz Press.
  5. ARFAH, A., OLILINGO, F. Z., SYAIFUDDIN, S., DAHLIAH, D., NURMIATI, N., & PUTRA, A. H. P. K. (2020). Economics During Global Recession: Sharia-Economics as a Post COVID-19 Agenda. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(11), 1077–1085. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.1077
  6. Ash-Shiddieqy, H. (1975). Falsafah Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.
  7. Azizy, A. Q. (2002). Eklektisisme Hukum Nasional, Kompetensi antara Hukum Islam dan Hukum Umum (Cetakan ke). Yogyakarta: Gama Media.
  8. Fathonih, A., Anggadwita, G., & Ibraimi, S. (2019). Sharia venture capital as financing alternative of Muslim entrepreneurs. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 13(3), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-11-2018-0090
  9. Hamid, M. A. (2007). Hukum Ekonomi Islam (Ekonomi Syariah) Di Indonesia Aplikasi dan Prospektifnya. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
  10. Kahf, M. (1987). Deskripsi Ekonomi Islam. ( diterjemahkan oleh R. Ka’bah, Ed.). Jakarta: Penerbit Minaret.
  11. Kholid, M. (2018). PRINSIP-PRINSIP HUKUM EKONOMI SYARIAH DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG PERBANKAN SYARIAH. Asy-Syari’ah, 20(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v20i2.3448
  12. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. (2004) (Cetakan ke). Jakarta, Indonesia: Pradiya Paramita.
  13. Manan, A. (2008). Aneka Masalah Hukum Perdata Islam Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  14. Mingka, A. (n.d.). Urgensi Kodifikasi Hukum ekonomi Syari’ah.
  15. PPHIMM. Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah.
  16. Rusli, N. (1999). Konsep Ijtihad asy-Syaukani, Relevansinya bagi Perubahan Hukum Islam di Indonesia. Ciputat: Logos Wacana Ilmu.
  17. Sabirin, S. (2003). Perjuangan Keluar Dari Krisis. Yogyakarta: BPEF.
  18. Soekanto, S. (1980). Pokok-Pokok Sosiologi Hukum (Cetakan ke). Jakarta: Rajawali.
  19. Subekti, R. (1991). Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Internusa.