Main Article Content

Abstract

This research This study aims to analyze the role of civil law in resolving land disputes by emphasizing three main aspects: the construction of lawsuits, evidence, and the implications of court decisions. The focus of the study is directed at how these three aspects are interrelated in providing legal certainty while also ensuring substantive justice for the disputing parties. This article falls under qualitative library research. The methodology applied is a juridical-normative study by examining legislation, legal doctrines, and jurisprudence related to land disputes. The resolution of land disputes through civil law highlights the importance of lawsuit construction, evidence, and court decisions as interdependent stages. Clear lawsuits and consistent evidence serve as the basis for judges to balance legal formalism with substantive justice. Court decisions have broad implications, not only for the legal certainty of land ownership but also for public trust in the legal system and social stability.

Keywords

Land Dispute Lawsuit Construction Implications

Article Details

How to Cite
Ika Ernawati, A., Awaluddin, M., Miftahuddin, M., & Hajairin, H. (2025). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan melalui Hukum Perdata: Dari Konstruksi Gugatan hingga Implikasi Putusan . Al-Muamalat Jurnal Hukum Dan Ekonomi Syariah, 10(2), 171-185. https://doi.org/10.32505/muamalat.v10i2.11636

References

  1. Akadol, J., Muchsin, T., & Saliro, S. S. (2020). Kegagalan Mediasi: Sengketa Pertanahan di Kementerian Agraria Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional Sambas. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 4(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v4i2.393
  2. Aksar, A., Dinata, U., Shaleh, A. I., Az-Zahra, F., Ambarwati, A., & Putri, M. (2023). Rekonstruksi Penyelesaian Sengketa Sertifikat Ganda Pada Badan Pertanahan Nasional. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 5(3), 537–549. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v5i3.537-549
  3. Claudia, J. (2023). Settlement of Land Disputes with the Competence of the State Administrative Court According to the Perspective of Indonesian Law. Asian Journal of Social and Humanities, 1(08), 399–406. https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v1i08.41
  4. Darmawan, D. A., Soetarto, E., Asnawi, Y. H., Mahasari, J., & Sukmawati, A. (2023). The History of Agrarian Reforms in Indonesia: A Sociological Perspective. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(11), e2196–e2196. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.2196
  5. Gultom, M., & Sidauruk, W. H. (2024). Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Menjatuhkan Hukuman Lebih Ringan terhadap Penyedia Chip Higgs Domino di Wilayah PN Pematangsiantar (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 54/Pid.B/2023/PN Pms). Jurnal Profil Hukum, 2(1), 39–56.
  6. Hanisa, I., Handayani, I. G. K. A. R., & Karjoko, L. (2025). Implikasi Hukum Sengketa Sertifikat Ganda Terhadap Kepastian Hak Atas Tanah dan Asas Kepastian Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains, 4(01), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v4i01.1844
  7. Komaruddin, K. (2020). Fairness in the distribution of land ownership in Indonesia based on Islamic law perspective. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 20(2), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v20i2.211-234
  8. Muthallib, A. (2024). Peran Hakim dalam Sengketa Tanah Berbasis Hukum Perdata: Analisis terhadap Kesenjangan Putusan Pengadilan. Al-Muamalat: Jurnal Hukum Dan Ekonomi Syari’ah, 9(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.32505/muamalat.v9i2.9885
  9. Nurokhim, N. (2021). Analisa Yuridis Pertimbangan Hakim atas Sengketa Tanah Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Perkara Banding No. 494/Pdt/2016/PT. DKI. Mustika Justice: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(2), Article 2. https://jurnal.uic.ac.id/mustikajustice/article/view/52
  10. Oktara, R., Zanariyah, S., & Famulia, L. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Akibat Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Viva Themis: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.24967/vt.v6i2.2423
  11. Sekar N.S, Rr. L., E, N. M., Hanifa, S., Sabila, F. A., Putra, M. P., Hakim, B. A., & G.b, I. S. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Peranan Kantor ATR/BPN terhadap Penyelesaian Permasalahan Sengketa Batas Tanah. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 1(4), 11–11. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v1i4.2333
  12. Shilva, S. N. (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Melalui Mediasi di Pengadilan Negeri Koto Baru (Studi Kasus Akta Perdamaian Nomor 15/Pdt.G/2022/PN Kbr). Jurnal Sarak Mangato Adat Mamakai, 9(2), Article 2. http://ojs.ummy.ac.id/index.php/sarmada/article/view/552
  13. Siki, M., Samudra, A. A., & Satispi, E. (2024). Conflict Situation and Proposals for Resolving Customary Land Conflicts in East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(1), e2743–e2743. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.2743
  14. Sujayadi, S., Wijayanta, T., & Herliana, H. (2023). Actor Sequitur Forum Rei: A Theoretical Study. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 7(2), 187–201.
  15. Taufik, A. A., Rifai, A. T. F., & Naswar. (2024). Transforming Conflict Resolution: Restorative Justice in Land Deed Registration. Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah, 9(2), 802–815. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v9i2.386
  16. Ulli, A., & Suryawati, N. (2022). Analisa Yuridis Terhadap Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Putusan yang Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap Mengenai Tanah Eigendom Bekas Milik Belanda (Studi Kasus Ahli Waris dari Frans Hadipurbojo). Jurnal Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 9(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v9i2.736-742
  17. warmin. (2023). Ratio Decidendi Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara Tanah Terlantar Ditinjau dari Perspektif Keadilan Hukum: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 2899 K/Pdt/2018. Mizanunat: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 1(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.59166/mizanuna.v1i1.30
  18. Wiguna, M. O. C. (2018). Peluang Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata tentang Tanah melalui Alternative Dispute Resolution. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 47(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.47.1.2018.47-55
  19. Wijayanta, T., & Aristya, S. D. F. (2014). Disparitas Putusan Perkara Sengketa Tanah Terkait Penerapan Hukum Formil. Jurnal Yudisial, 7(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v7i2.86