Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jan 19, 2025
Published
Feb 8, 2025
Download
Pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 107 Download : 105

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Discriminatory treatment and gender stereotypes against women in the justice system are directly related to women's accessibility to justice. The more women experience discrimination and negative stereotypes, the more limited their access to justice becomes. The implementation of Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 3 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating Cases Involving Women in Conflict with the Law has not been effectively carried out. For instance, some judges in the trial process have not adhered to the guidelines set out in PERMA No. 3 of 2017. In reality, there are still judges who make belittling, blaming, intimidating statements, and use loud voices against women in conflict with the law, which can undermine women's mentality in court. In response to these conditions, the Supreme Court, as the highest judicial institution in Indonesia, has initiated steps to gradually eliminate discriminatory treatment against women in conflict with the law in judicial practices in Indonesia. This study aims to examine the efforts made by judges in implementing PERMA No. 3 of 2017 at the Banda Aceh Sharia Court and to explore the perspectives of Sharia Court judges regarding the implementation of PERMA No. 3 of 2017. The research uses a qualitative method with a field research approach. This study indicates that there are still challenges in implementing PERMA No. 3 of 2017 at the Banda Aceh Sharia Court. However, efforts are being made to reduce discrimination and negative stereotypes against women in conflict with the law. This research contributes to providing insights into the importance of implementing guidelines to reduce discriminatory treatment and offering recommendations to improve the effectiveness of PERMA No. 3 of 2017 in addressing gender discrimination issues in Indonesian courts.

Keywords

Women's Access to Justice Sharia Court Legal Gender Equality

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Aliani Fauziyah, Ratnaningsih Lilis, and Prayuti Yuyut. 2019. Pe$rlindungan Hukum Bagi Pe$re$mpuan Yang Be$rhadapan De$ngan Hukum Ditinjau Dari Pe$raturan Mahkamah Agung Re$publik Indo$ne$sia No$. 3 Tahun 2017 Tantang Pe$rkara Pe$re$mpuan Be$rhadapan De$ngan Hukum. Vo$l. 1.
  2. Amran Suardi. 2018. Pe$ranan Pe$radilan Agama Dalam Me$lindungi Hak Pe$re$mpuan Dan Anak Me$lalui Putusan Yang Me$mihak Dan Dapat Dilaksanakan/ The$ Ro$le$ O$f Re$le$gio$us Co$urt In Wo$me$n And Childre$n Rights Pro$te$ctio$n Thro$ugh Partial And E$xe$cutable$ De$cisio$n. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pe$radilan 7(3):353. do$i: 10.25216/jhp.7.3.2018.353-374. Vo$l. 7, No$. 3.
  3. Ani Triwati. 2019. HUMANI (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani) Akse$s Ke$adilan Se$bagai Pe$rlindungan Hukum Bagi Pe$re$mpuan Be$rhadapan De$ngan Hukum Dalam Siste$m Pe$radilan Pidana. Justice$ Acce$ss Le$gal Pro$te$ctio$n Fo$r Wo$me$n With A Law In The$ Criminal Justice$ Syste$m. 9:79. Vo$l. 9 No$. 1.
  4. Anne$ Lo$ckle$y e$t al. 2019. Ge$rakan 1000 Sahabat Jurnal Pe$re$mpuan. Vo$l. 24 No$. 1.
  5. Asit De$fi Indriyani. 2022. Pe$nde$katan Re$sto$rative$Justice$ Dalam Me$lindungi Ko$rban Ke$ke$rasan Se$ksual. Vo$l. 2.
  6. Be$stha Inathan Aisila and De$bo$ra Silalahi. 2018. Pe$do$man Me$ngadili Pe$rkara Pe$re$mpuan Be$rhadapan De$ngan Hukum. De$po$k: MAPPI FH UI.
  7. Daffa Arya Prayo$ga e$t al. 2023. Pe$rlindungan Hukum Te$rhadap Hak Warga Ne$gara De$ngan Be$rlakunya Undang-Undang No$mo$r 23 Tahun 2019 Te$ntang Pe$nge$lo$laan Sumbe$r Daya Nasio$nal. Vo$l. 2.
  8. De$wa Ge$de$ Atmadja. 2018. Asas-Asas Hukum Dalam Siste$m Hukum. Ke$rtha Wicaksana 12(2):145–55. do$i: 10.22225/kw.12.2.721.145-155. Vo$l. 12, No$. 2.
  9. DP3KAK Pro$vinsi Jawa Timur. 2023. Pe$rlindungan Pe$re$mpuan Pada Saat Be$rhadapan De$ngan Hukum.
  10. Ibnu Alwato$n Surya Walide$n e$t al. 2022. Tinjauan Asas E$qualty Be$fo$re$ The$ Law Te$rhadap Pe$ne$gakan Hukum Di Indo$ne$sia. Ve$rfassung: Jurnal Hukum Tata Ne$gara 1(2):123–42. do$i: 10.30762/vjhtn.v1i2.186. Vo$l. 1, No$. 2.
  11. Imam Mukhlish Ash Shiddiq, e$t al. (2023). 24-DasSo$lle$n0201-754. Jurnal Das So$lle$n Kajian Ko$nte$npo$re$r Hukum Dan Masyarakat, Analisis Asas Ke$manfaatan Hukum Te$rhadap Pe$mbe$rian De$nda Tindak Pidana O$le$h Ko$rpo$rasi Pe$rbankan (Ditinjau Putusan No$mo$r 4/Pid.B/2024/PN Bar). https://do$i.o$rg/10.11111/dasso$lle$n.xxxxxxx
  12. Le$mbaga Pe$rce$takan Al’Qur’an Ke$me$nag RI. n.d. Al’Qur’an Dan Te$rje$mahanya. Jakarta: LPQ, 2013.
  13. Muhammad Rijal Fadli, 2021. Me$mahami De$sain Me$to$de$ Pe$ne$litian Kualitatif, Jurnal Humanika, Vo$l.21, No$.1.
  14. Muh. Wahyu himawan e$t al. 2022. Pe$laksanaan Pe$raturan Mahkamah Agung No$ 3 Tahun 2017 Untuk Me$lindungi Hak Pe$re$mpuan Di Pe$ngadilan Agama Kudus. Vo$l. 23. Kudus.
  15. Muhammad Abdul Husni Abdullah Pakarti. (2023). Analisis Pe$rbandiangan Pe$ne$rapan Hukum Ke$luarga Di Me$sir Dan Di Indo$ne$sia. Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Ke$luarga Dan Pe$radilan Islam, 4 (Asas Ke$adilan Se$bagai Salah Satu Landasan Hakim Dalam Me$mutuskan Putusan Pe$rce$raian), 123–132. https://do$i.o$rg/10.15575/as.v2i2.14327, Vo$l. 4, no$. 2
  16. Nur Kho$lish. (2018). Asas No$n Diskriminasi Dalam Co$nte$mpt O$f Co$urt. In Nur Kho$lis Asas No$n Diskriminasi dalam Co$nte$mpt o$f Co$urt Le$gality (Vo$l. 26, Issue$ 2).
  17. Nurhilmiyah. 2019. Pe$rlindungan Hukum Te$rhadap Pe$re$mpuan Be$rhadapan De$ngan Hukum Se$be$lum Dan Se$sudah Lahirnya Pe$rma No$mo$r 3 Tahun 2017 Te$ntang Pe$do$man Me$ngadili Pe$rkara Pe$re$mpuan Be$rhadapan De$ngan Hukum. DE$ LE$GA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4(1):211–19. do$i: 10.30596/dll.v4i2.3172. Vo$l. 4, No$. 2.
  18. Nursyamsi Ichsan. 2020. Jurnal Nursyamsi Ichsan. O$f Islamic Family Law (Pe$ne$rapan Pe$rma No$. 03 Tahun 2017 Te$ntang Pe$do$man Me$ngadili Pe$rkara Pe$re$mpuan Be$rhadapan De$ngan Hukum Di Pe$ngadilan (Studi Di Pe$ngadilan Ne$ge$ri Palo$po$):16. Vo$l. 02, No$. 01.
  19. Ne$o$ng Muhadjir. 2000. Me$to$de$lo$gi Pe$ne$litian Kualitatif, Rake$sarasin, Yo$gyakarta.
  20. Re$zki E$ka Putri, and Muhammad Amiruddin. 2020. Pe$rlindungan Hukum Bagi Pe$re$mpuan Be$rhadapan De$ngan Hukum. Vo$l. 2.
  21. Silmi Mursidah. 2018. Analisis Maslahah Te$rhadap PE$RMA No$ 3 Tahun 2017 Te$ntang Pe$do$man Me$ngadili Pe$re$mpuan Be$rhadapan De$ngan Hukum. Vo$l. 08.
  22. Silvia Putri dan Amar Ma, Rizky. 2018. Imple$me$ntasi Pe$raturan Mahkamah Agung No$ 3 Tahun 2017 Te$ntang Pe$do$man Me$ngadili Pe$rkara Pe$re$mpuan Be$rhadapan De$ngan Hukum Te$rhadap Pe$rkara Ce$rai Gugat Di Pe$ngadilan Agama Tanjung Karang. Lampung. Vo$l. VII No$.2.
  23. So$nny De$wi Judiasih. 2022. Imple$me$ntasi Ke$se$taraan Ge$nde$r Dalam Be$be$rapa Aspe$k Ke$hidupan Be$rmasyarakat Di Indo$ne$sia. Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Ke$no$tariatan Dan Ke$-PPAT-An 5(2). do$i: 10.23920/acta.v5i2.904. Vo$l. 5, No$. 2.
  24. Sugiyo$no$. 2021. Pe$nde$katan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. Afabe$ta, Bandung, E$d. 2. Ce$t. 3.
  25. Wildan Suyuthi Musto$fa. 2013. E$tika Ko$de$ E$tik Hakim. 2e$d e$d. Jakarta: Ke$ncana Pre$nada Me$dia.
  26. Zahrul Baizah. 2022. Pe$re$mpuan Be$rhadapan De$ngan Hukum.
  27. Zainuddin Ali. 2009. Me$to$de$ Pe$ne$litian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.