Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jan 3, 2025
Published
Jan 27, 2025
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 133 Download : 88

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Corruption is a major factor that undermines government credibility and diminishes the quality of public services. Corruption practices have evolved beyond legal issues to become part of the complex dynamics of political battles, particularly in the context of electoral processes. This study aims to analyze the forms of campaign corruption carried out by political officials at the end of their terms in office and to examine the implementation of law enforcement against political officials involved in campaign corruption in Indonesia. This research employs a normative juridical method, utilizing secondary data analysis, focusing on legal provisions related to criminal acts of corruption, especially campaign corruption, through a literature review and relevant theoretical analysis. The findings indicate that campaign corruption is a systemic issue that damages the electoral process and erodes public trust in government. Abuse of power manifests in various forms, including the use of state facilities, mobilization of government apparatus, and distribution of cash to gain support. The Indonesian government has attempted to address this issue through regulations such as Law No. 31 of 1999, Law No. 20 of 2001, and establishing the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). However, law enforcement efforts face several challenges, including political interference, poor coordination among law enforcement agencies, and weaknesses in the legal system that perpetrators of corruption exploit. The contribution of this research lies in identifying gaps in regulations and implementing law enforcement against campaign corruption. This study provides recommendations for strengthening inter-agency coordination, improving existing regulations, and enhancing transparency in electoral oversight, thereby supporting more effective efforts to combat corruption in Indonesia.

Keywords

Campaign Corruption Electoral Process Corruption Eradication Commission Political Officials

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Adminkepemerintahan. “Pengaruh Korupsi Terhadap Stabilitas Politik Di Negara Berkembang.” Adminkepemerintahan, 2024.
  2. Adnan Topan Husodo. “Mengantisipasi Maraknya Korupsi Pemilu.” Indonesia Corruption Watch, 2009.
  3. Asbudi Dwi Saputra. “No TitlePencegahan Dan Penindakan Pelanggaran Netralitas Aparatur Sipil Negara (Asn) Oleh Bawaslu Kota Palopo Pada Pemilu 2019.” Jurnal I La Galigo | Public Administration Journal, 2020, 9–17.
  4. BBC News Indonesia. “Gubernur Bengkulu diduga ‘peras’ anak buah hingga Rp7 miliar untuk ongkosi pilkada, mengapa tidak didiskualifikasi.” BBC News Indonesia, 2024.
  5. Begouvic, M Eza Helyatha, dan Bayu Cuan. “Money Politik Pada Kepemiluan Di Indonesia.” Sol Justicia 4, no. 2 (2021): 105–22. https://doi.org/10.54816/sj.v4i2.451.
  6. Bekri Reski. “Kampanye Pendidikan Anti Korupsi.” Jurnal Dakwah dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat 10, no. 1 (2022): 1–52. https://doi.org/10.21608/pshj.2022.250026.
  7. Firmansyah, Vicky Zaynul, dan Firdaus Syam. “Penguatan Hukum Administrasi Negara Pencegah Praktik Korupsi dalam Diri Pemerintahan Indonesia.” Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi 7, no. 2 (2022): 325–44. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i2.817.
  8. Ghazaly Ama La Nora. Ilmu Komunikasi Politik. Yogyakarta: CV. ANDI OFFSET, 2014.
  9. Kasim. “MONEY POLITICS PADA PEMILU 2019 (Kajian Terhadap Potret Pengawasan dan Daya Imperatif Hukum Pemilu).” Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu ISSN 2, no. 1 (2019): 19–33.
  10. Kristian and Yopi Gunawan. Tindak Pidana Korupsi Kajian Terhadap Harmonisasi Antara Hukum Nasional Dan The United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC). Ed. Edi Se. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2015.
  11. Mutawalli, Muhammad. “Prinsip Periodik Dalam Pemilihan Umum: Orientasi Dan Implikasinya Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 23, no. 3 (2023).
  12. Neova Derenov Budhi Arti & Ratih Yanuar Rizky. “Analisis Korupsi Dan Upaya Mewujudkan Good Governance Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Pemerintahan Daerah 15, no. 2 (2023): 140–49.
  13. Outlook Korupsi Politik 2018. “Ancaman Korupsi di Balik Pemilu Serentak.” Indonesia Corruption Watch, 2018.
  14. Pamungkas, Yogo. “Tinjauan Ambang Batas Perolehan Suara Berdasarkan UU No.8 Tahun 2012 tentang Pemilihan Anggota DPR, DPD dan DPRD terhadap UUD 1945.” RechtsVinding 3, no. 8 (2014): 33–50. https://rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id/ejournal/index.php/jrv/article/viewFile/55/49.
  15. Paskarina, Caroline. “Korupsi Politik dalam Kompetisi Elektoral.” Prisma 37, no. 3 (2018): 37–50. http://www.bpkp.go.id/.
  16. Rahman, Abdul, Najamuddin, dan Wildhan Khalyubi. “Kontestasi Partai Persatuan Pembangunan Pada Pemilihan Umum Tahun 2019.” Ganaya : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora 5, no. 2 (2022): 140–56. https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v5i2.1658.
  17. Rayhan Naufaldi Hidayat. “Penguatan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Secara Kelembagaan Dengan Meletakkan Konstitusi Sebagai Dasar Legitimasi.” Jurnal USM Law Review 4, no. 3 (2020): 120–123.
  18. Robi Ardianto. “Partisipasi Masyarakat Tinggi, Dari 262 Kasus Politik Uang 197 Laporan Masyarakat.” Bawaslu, 2020.
  19. S, Laurensius Arliman. “Keterbukaan Keuangan Partai Politik Terhadap Praktik Pencucian Uang Dari Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Cita Hukum 4, no. 2 (2016): 225–40. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v4i2.3433.
  20. Satria Hariman. “Politik Hukum Tindak Pidana Politik Uang dalam Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia.” Jurnal Antikorupsi Integritas 5, no. 1 (2017): 1–14.
  21. Tibiko Zabar Pradano. “Korupsi dan Pemilihan Kepala Daerah 2018.” detikNews, 2018.