Main Article Content

Abstract

This research is motivated by the existence of an inheritance dispute caused by the existence of a will deed made by a Notary that is contrary to the provisions of Legitieme Portie. In Article 913 of the Civil Code it is regulated that Legitieme portie must be given to the heirs in a straight line according to the law, against which the deceased person may not determine anything, even with a will deed. The formulation of the problem in this research is How is the notary's responsibility for a will that violates the absolute rights (Legitieme Portie) of the heirs in the Civil Code, and What are the legal consequences of a will deed that violates the absolute rights (Legitieme Portie) of the heirs in the Civil Code. The theory used in this research is the Theory of responsibility according to Hans Kelsen and the Theory of consequences according to Soeroso. The research method used in this study is normative juridical. Legal research is conducted by examining library materials or secondary data only. This study uses legislative, conceptual, analytical, and case-based approaches. The results of this study indicate that a notary who makes a deed contrary to the provisions of the Legitieme Portie is obliged to be held accountable under civil law. Although the court decision does not stipulate sanctions for notaries, if the notary is later sued by a party who feels aggrieved, the notary must be held accountable. The legal consequence of the will is that it is null and void and has no binding legal force.

Keywords

Wills Inheritance notaries

Article Details

References

  1. Afandi, Ali. Hukum Waris Hukum Keluarga Hukum Pembuktian Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (BW. PT Bina Aksara, 1984.
  2. Afifah, Kunni. Tanggung Jawab dan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Notaris secara Perdata Terhadap Akta yang Dibuatnya, Tesis. Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2017.
  3. Ali, Zainuddin. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika Jakarta, 2011.
  4. Indradewi, Astrid Athina. “Keberlakuan dan Kekuatan Hukum Terhadap Wasiat yang Melanggar Legitieme Portie Ahli Waris”.” Jurnal Sapientia et Virtus 8, no. 1 (2023).
  5. Kie, Tan Thong. Studi Notariat dan Serba-Serbi Praktek Notaris, PT. Ichtiar Baru Van Hoeve, 2007.
  6. Mamminanga, Andi. Pelaksanaan Kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Notaris Daerah dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas Jabatan Notaris berdasarkan UUJN, Tesis. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2008.
  7. Moechthar, Oemar. Perkembangan Hukum Waris Praktik Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewarisan di Indonesia. Prenadamedia Group, 2019.
  8. No, Undang-undang Nomor. “2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang.” Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris, no. 30 (n.d.).
  9. Perangin, Effendi, P.T.Raja Grafindo Persada Hukum Waris, and Jakarta. Eman Suparman, Hukum Waris Indonesia. Dalam Prespektif Islam, Adat, dan BW), PT Refika Aditama, 2006.
  10. Senoadji, Andreas Prasetyo. Penerapan Legitieme Portie (Bagian Mutlak) dalam pembagian Waris Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Reg No. Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Diponegoro, 148AD.
  11. Soerjopratiknjo, Hartono. Hukum Waris Testamenter. Seksi Notariat Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gajah Mada, 1984.
  12. Soeroso, R. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Sinar Grafika, 2007.
  13. Suparman, Maman. Hukum Waris Perdata. Sinar Grafika, 2019.