Main Article Content

Abstract

The existence of Adat in Aceh is getting stronger after the MoU between the Indonesian government and the Free Aceh Movement. However, it cannot be denied that customary disputes continue to occur. Lecturers as academics are required to be involved in the customary settlement process because this is a form of lecturer service to the community. This paper aims to look further at the involvement of PTKIN lecturers in Aceh in the customary dispute resolution process. This research resulted from an empirical study using a sociological approach. The sociological approach looks at how the activities of the Acehnese indigenous people contribute to resolving customer disputes. This study focuses on two PTKIN consisting of lecturers at UIN Ar-Raniry and IAIN Lhokseumawe. Data sources were obtained from interviews and observations; data analysis was carried out by means of data reduction obtained from the interviewer, and then analysis was carried out. The results of this study indicate that practically, law lecturers, with their scientific discipline, have contributed to the resolution of customary disputes. The law lecturer at PTKIN has carried out several stages of customary dispute resolution, starting from examining the problem, carrying out mediation, and reviewing legal norms that are used as a reference in dispute resolution. The strategy for resolving disputes is carried out by classifying the problem and bringing it closer to the legal aspect so as to produce a balanced solution both in terms of aspects of religious law and state law. Obstacles and problems that occur are related to the lack of agreement between the parties regarding customary decisions, so the parties choose the path of litigation (court). The litigation route is the last alternative when an agreement cannot be reached through a customary decision.

Keywords

Law Lecturer PTKIN Customary disputes Memorandum of Understanding

Article Details

References

  1. Achyar, G. (2020). Dosen Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Ar-raniry Banda Aceh [Personal communication].
  2. Amalia, N., Mukhlis, M., & Yusrizal, Y. (2018). Model Penyelesaian Sengketa dan Peradilan Adat di Aceh. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 25(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss1.art8
  3. Asrun, A. M., Rosyadi, A. R., & Milono, Y. K. (2019). Mempertanyakan Legalitas Qanun Aceh: Sesuaikah dengan Sistem Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 21(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v21i2.12632
  4. Bahreisy, B. (2020). Peran Lembaga Adat di Aceh dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.25-36
  5. Djawas, M., & Samad, S. A. A. (2020). Conflict, Traditional, and Family Resistance: The Pattern of Dispute Resolution in Acehnese Community According to Islamic Law. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v4i1.5271
  6. Ilyas, I., A.Rani, F., Bahri, S., & Sufyan, S. (2023). The Accommodation of Customary Law to Islamic Law: Distribution of Inheritance in Aceh from a Pluralism Perspectives. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 7(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i2.15650
  7. Iskandar, M. (2020). Dosen Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Ar-raniry Banda Aceh [Personal communication].
  8. J. Moleong, L. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosadakarya.
  9. Jamhir, J. (2020). Revitalisasi Hukum Adat di Aceh. Jurnal Justisia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.22373/justisia.v1i1.2562
  10. Kartono, K. (1990). Pengantar Metodologi Research Sosial. Mandar Maju.
  11. Kasim, F. M., & Nurdin, A. (2020). Study of Sociological Law on Conflict Resolution Through Adat in Aceh Community According to Islamic Law. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 4(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v4i2.8231
  12. Khoiruddin, M. A. (2014). Pendekatan Sosiologi Dalam Studi Islam. Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, 25(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.33367/tribakti.v25i2.191
  13. Lian, B. (2019). Tanggung jawab tridharma perguruan tinggi menjawab kebutuhan masyarakat. Prosiding seminar nasional program pascasarjana universitas pgri palembang. https://jurnal.univpgri-palembang.ac.id/index.php/Prosidingpps/article/view/2965
  14. Mardalis. (2008). Metode Penelitian. Buki Aksara.
  15. Missbach, A. (2011). The Acehnese diaspora after the Helsinki Memorandum of Understanding: Return challenges and diasporic post-conflict transformations. Asian Ethnicity, 12(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2011.571836
  16. Mubarak, H. (2022). Dosen Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Ar-raniry Banda Aceh [Personal communication].
  17. Nasrullah. (2020). Dosen Fakultas Syariah IAIN Lhokseumawe [Personal communication].
  18. Rachmawati, I. N. (2007). Pengumpulan Data Dalam Penelitian Kualitatif: Wawancara. Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.7454/jki.v11i1.184
  19. Rosaliza, M. (2015). Wawancara, Sebuah Interaksi Komunikasi Dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 11(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.31849/jib.v11i2.1099
  20. Salim, A. (2021). Adat and Islamic Law in Contemporary Aceh, Indonesia: Unequal Coexistence and Asymmetric Contestation. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 5(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.11082
  21. Sugiyono. (2012). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.
  22. Suyanto, B., & Sutinah. (2006). Metode Penelitian Sosial Berbagai Alternatif Pendekatan. Kencana Perdana Media Group.
  23. Walidain, M. P., & Astuti, L. (2021). Implementasi Qanun Jinayat dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana di Aceh. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC), 2(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v2i3.13790
  24. Yuliawati, S. (2012). Kajian Implementasi Tri Dharma Perguruan Tinggi sebagai Fenomena Pendidikan Tinggi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Widya, 218712.
  25. Zaki ’Ulya. (2014). Refleksi Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) Helsinki Dalam Kaitan Makna Otonomi Khusus Di Aceh. Jurnal Konstitusi, 11(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1129