Article Sidebar

Submitted
Dec 4, 2023
Published
Dec 10, 2023
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 97 Download : 76

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Democracy in the government system places emphasis on power in the hands of the people; however, with the approval of election law number 7 of 2017 regarding the regulation of threshold requirements for presidential and vice presidential candidates, it is considered detrimental to the people because the additional conditions related to the administrative requirements for presidential and vice presidential candidates are deemed to be contradictory. With the 1945 Constitution Article 6A paragraph (2) and Article 28 D paragraph (3) on human rights, especially the right to participate in politics, the space for democracy is limited because, basically, Indonesian people have the right to vote and choose. In fact, it has been proven that there are only two candidates for president and vice president in the 2014–2019 and 2019–2024 election periods, forcing the public to choose the candidates that have been provided, even though these candidates are not necessarily the candidates that the public expects, thus giving the impression of forcing personal human rights to participate. in the presidential election. In this research, the author uses a normative legal research method in the form of a library search. The results of the research show that the nomination requirements regulated in the 1945 Constitution, Article 6A paragraph (2), do not regulate thresholds, but there are additional requirements in Article 222 that have become controversial, so that the threshold causes the loss of political rights to be able to suggest presidential and vice presidential candidates. Conflicts can destroy democracy. . Indonesia. People and political parties who want to run for the presidential election cross the threshold so that entering a presidential system gives rise to limited democracy. This is because national hopes still require a judicial review to guarantee the upholding of human rights, which hampers the process of emerging more alternative leadership candidates to realize people's welfare. From a benefit perspective, whatever government policy, must take into account the aspirations of its people, so that government policy must be in line with the public interest.

Keywords

Presidential Threshold Elections Human Rights Justice

Article Details

References

  1. Adhitya, A. W., & Sunarso, S. (2020). Dampak Presidential Threshold Terhadap Partai Politik Dalam Pemilihan Presiden 2019. AGORA, 9(5), Article 5.
  2. Ahmad, A. (2020). Hukum Konstitusi: Menyongsong Fajar Perubahan Konstitusi Indonesia Melalui Pelibatan Mahkamah Konstitusi. UII Press Yogyakarta. https://balaiyanpus.jogjaprov.go.id/opac/detail-opac?id=321525
  3. Anggono, B. D. (2014). Perspektif Konstitusi Indonesia pada Kerjasama Partai Politik dalam Pemilihan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v9i1.3000
  4. Ansori, L. (2017). Telaah Terhadap Presidential Threshold Dalam Pemilu Serentak 2019. Jurnal Yuridis, 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.35586/.v4i1.124
  5. Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer. Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504
  6. Budiarjo, M. (2017). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Penerbitan Universitas Terbuka.
  7. Cahyono, S. (2023). Efektivitas Presidential Threshold dan Penguatan Sistem Presidensial dalam Sistem Multi Partai. Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan, 1(1), Article 1.
  8. Chairul Huda, M. (2021). METODE PENELITIAN HUKUM (Pendekatan Yuridis Sosiologis). The Mahfud Ridwan Institute.
  9. Faiz, P. M. (2009). Teori Keadilan John Rawls (John Rawls’ Theory of Justice). SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2847573
  10. Fuqoha, F. (2017). Pengisian Jabatan Presiden dan Presidential Threshold dalam Demokrasi Konstitusional di Indonesia. Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v1i2.495
  11. Humairo, P. R., & Ruslie, A. S. (2023). Batas Parlemen Perliamentary Threshold & Presidential Threshold Di Indonesia Dalam Prinsip Demokrasi & Ham. Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i2.256
  12. Islami, M. F., & Kalimas, F. (2023). Perspektif Ham Tentang Presidential Threshold (Analisis Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017). Islamic Constitutional Law, 1(1), Article 1.
  13. Isrok, & Al-Uyun, D. (2019). Ilmu Negara: Berjalan Di Dalam Dunia. UB Press.
  14. Mahardika, A. G. (2019). Potensi Pelanggaran Hak Konstitusional dalam Pemilu Serentak Menggunakan Sistem Presidential Threshold. DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.32503/diversi.v5i1.540
  15. Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Prenada Media.
  16. Mas’udah, A. (2020). The Presidential Threshold As An Open Legal Policy In General Elections In Indonesia. Prophetic Law Review, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol2.iss1.art3
  17. Monteiro, J. M. (2023). Presidential Threshold and Parliamentary Threshold Setting in Elections. Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies, 1(02), Article 02. https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v1i02.32
  18. Mukhtarrija, M., Handayani, I. G. A. K. R., & Riwanto, A. (2017a). Inefektifitas Pengaturan Presidential Threshold dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 24(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss4.art7
  19. Mukhtarrija, M., Handayani, I. G. A. K. R., & Riwanto, A. (2017b). Inefektifitas Pengaturan Presidential Threshold dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 24(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss4.art7
  20. Mulyana, F. D. (2023). Problems With the Presidential Threshold System in Elections. JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah, 8(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.24815/jimps.v8i4.28159
  21. Munir, S. (2023). Pengaruh Presidential Threshold Terhadap Alternatif Pilihan Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden. JOURNAL IURIS SCIENTIA, 1(2), Article 2.
  22. Muttaqin, L., & Ananda, M. A. R. (2022). Presidential Threshold Seen From Perspective Constitutional Democracy. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(10), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v5i10.591
  23. Prabowo, B. S. (2022). Menggagas Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Presidential Threshold di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1914
  24. Pujianti, S. (n.d.). Aturan Presidential Threshold Dinilai Batasi Jumlah Calon Presiden | Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Retrieved December 10, 2023, from https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=17959&menu=2
  25. Rizal, M. (2021). Presidential Threshold 20% Ditinjau Menurut Prinsip Demokrasi [Skripsi]. UIN Ar-Raniry.
  26. Rumah Pemilu. (n.d.). Rumah Pemilu. Retrieved December 8, 2023, from https://rumahpemilu.org/
  27. Saifulloh, P. P. A. (2022). Penafsiran Pembentuk Undang-Undang Membentuk Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka Presidential Threshold Dalam Undang-Undang Pemilihan Umum Yang Bersumber Dari Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 11(1), 153. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v11i1.867
  28. Setiawan, A. H. (2023a). Politik Hukum Presidential Threshold 20% Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017. JAPHTN-HAN, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.55292/japhtnhan.v2i1.64
  29. Setiawan, A. H. (2023b). Politik Hukum Presidential Threshold 20% Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017. JAPHTN-HAN, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.55292/japhtnhan.v2i1.64
  30. Shirotol, A. (2023). Polemik Presidential Threshold Dalam Pemilu 2019 dan Sebelum Kontestasi Pemilu 2024 di Indonesia. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v3i3.5518
  31. Sigit, P. (2009). Perihal Pemilu. Laboratorium Fisipol UGM.
  32. Sumodiningrat, G., & Agustian, A. G. (2008). Mencintai Bangsa dan Negara: Pegangan Dalam Hidup Berbangsa dan Bernegara di Indonesia. ARGA.
  33. Yusmalinda, Y., Ismail, S., Muhammadiah, M. R. bin, Firdaus, M., & Muhazir, M. (2023). Islam dan Sosial Kontrol: Menelisik Penerapan Syariat Islam di Aceh. Jurnal El-Qanuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan Dan Pranata Sosial, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24952/el-qanuniy.v9i1.7711