Main Article Content
Abstract
Penalaran bukalah sesuatu yang dapat tumbuh dan berkebang sendiri tanpa adanya sebab. Guru memegang peran penting Merancang dan melaksanakan pembelajaran menjadi bermakna dan dapat meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran merupakan tuntutan yang harus dilaksanakan oleh guru. Makalah ini ingin mendeskripsikan persepsi guru sekolah dasar terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematika yang ingin dikembangkan oleh pemerintah. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian survey, dengan pendekan penelitian kualitatif deskriptif. Subjek penelitian terdiri dari 12 orang guru sekolah dasar yang ada di Kota Langsa. Teknik pengumpulan data wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan presepsi guru sekolah dasar terhadap penalaran matematika siswa dikategorikan dalam tiga kategori yaitu penalaran dianggap sebagai sebuah kemampuan dalam berpikir, penalaran dianggap sebagai kemampuan dalam berkomunikasi, penalaran dianggap sebagai penggunaan argument secara logis untuk memvalidasi dugaan.
Keywords
Article Details
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al Qalasadi of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al Qalasadi published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
References
- Barnett, M. (2019). 12. Social constructivism. The Globalization of World Politics, (2006), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198825548.003.0012
- Dawkins, P. C., & Roh, K. H. (2016). Promoting Metalinguistic and Metamathematical Reasoning in Proof-Oriented Mathematics Courses: a Method and a Framework. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 2(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0027-0
- Erdem, E., & GÜRBÜZ, R. (2014). an Analysis of Seventh-Grade Students’ Mathematical Reasoning. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 44(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.14812/cufej.2015.007
- Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2005). Conditions for promoting reasoning in problem solving: Insights from a longitudinal study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3–4), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.09.001
- Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2011). Teachers attending to students’ mathematical reasoning: Lessons from an after-school research program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-010-9144-x
- Franke, M. L., Webb, N. M., Chan, A. G., Ing, M., Freund, D., & Battey, D. (2009). Teacher questioning to elicit students’ mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(4), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109339906
- Herbert, S., Vale, C., Bragg, L. A., Loong, E., & Widjaja, W. (2015). A framework for primary teachers’ perceptions of mathematical reasoning. International Journal of Educational Research, 74, 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.09.005
- Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). ELHAM KAZEMI and MEGAN LOEF FRANKE TEACHER LEARNING IN MATHEMATICS: USING STUDENT WORK TO PROMOTE COLLECTIVE INQUIRY. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 203–235.
- Kuo, E., Hull, M. M., Gupta, A., & Elby, A. (2013). How students blend conceptual and formal mathematical reasoning in solving physics problems. Science Education, 97(1), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21043
- Lithner, J. (2000). Mathematical reasoning in task solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(2), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003956417456
- Loewenberg Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
- Loong, E. Y.-K., Vale, C., Herbert, S., & Bragg, L. A. (2017). Tracking change in primary teachers’ understanding of mathematical reasoning through demonstration lessons. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 19(1), 5–19.
- Mueller, M., Yankelewitz, D., & Maher, C. (2014). Teachers Promoting Student Mathematical Reasoning. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 7(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/24727466.2014.11790339
- Stylianides, A. J., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Understanding and describing mathematical knowledge for teaching: Knowledge about proof for engaging students in the activity of proving. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(4), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9077-9
- Tall, D. (2014). Making Sense of Mathematical Reasoning and Proof. (2008), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7473-5_13
- Vale, C., Widjaja, W., Herbert, S., Bragg, L. A., & Loong, E. Y. K. (2017). Mapping Variation in Children’s Mathematical Reasoning: The Case of ‘What Else Belongs?’ International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(5), 873–894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9725-y