Article Sidebar

Submitted
Sep 20, 2021
Accepted
Dec 14, 2021
Published
Dec 23, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 201 Download : 207

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Penalaran bukalah sesuatu yang dapat tumbuh dan berkebang sendiri tanpa adanya sebab. Guru memegang peran penting Merancang dan melaksanakan pembelajaran menjadi bermakna dan dapat meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran merupakan tuntutan yang harus dilaksanakan oleh guru. Makalah ini ingin mendeskripsikan persepsi guru sekolah dasar terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematika yang ingin dikembangkan oleh pemerintah. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian survey, dengan pendekan penelitian kualitatif deskriptif. Subjek penelitian terdiri dari 12 orang guru sekolah dasar yang ada di Kota Langsa. Teknik pengumpulan data wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan presepsi guru sekolah dasar terhadap penalaran matematika siswa dikategorikan dalam tiga kategori yaitu penalaran dianggap sebagai sebuah kemampuan dalam berpikir, penalaran dianggap sebagai kemampuan dalam berkomunikasi, penalaran dianggap sebagai penggunaan argument secara logis untuk memvalidasi dugaan.

Keywords

persepsi, guru sekolah dasar, penalaran matematika.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wahyuni, W., & Zaiyar, M. (2021). PERSEPSI GURU SEKOLAH DASAR TERHADAP PENALARAN MATEMATIKA. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al Qalasadi, 5(2), 128-132. https://doi.org/10.32505/qalasadi.v5i2.3302

References

  1. Barnett, M. (2019). 12. Social constructivism. The Globalization of World Politics, (2006), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198825548.003.0012
  2. Dawkins, P. C., & Roh, K. H. (2016). Promoting Metalinguistic and Metamathematical Reasoning in Proof-Oriented Mathematics Courses: a Method and a Framework. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 2(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0027-0
  3. Erdem, E., & GÜRBÜZ, R. (2014). an Analysis of Seventh-Grade Students’ Mathematical Reasoning. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 44(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.14812/cufej.2015.007
  4. Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2005). Conditions for promoting reasoning in problem solving: Insights from a longitudinal study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3–4), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.09.001
  5. Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2011). Teachers attending to students’ mathematical reasoning: Lessons from an after-school research program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-010-9144-x
  6. Franke, M. L., Webb, N. M., Chan, A. G., Ing, M., Freund, D., & Battey, D. (2009). Teacher questioning to elicit students’ mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(4), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109339906
  7. Herbert, S., Vale, C., Bragg, L. A., Loong, E., & Widjaja, W. (2015). A framework for primary teachers’ perceptions of mathematical reasoning. International Journal of Educational Research, 74, 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.09.005
  8. Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). ELHAM KAZEMI and MEGAN LOEF FRANKE TEACHER LEARNING IN MATHEMATICS: USING STUDENT WORK TO PROMOTE COLLECTIVE INQUIRY. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 203–235.
  9. Kuo, E., Hull, M. M., Gupta, A., & Elby, A. (2013). How students blend conceptual and formal mathematical reasoning in solving physics problems. Science Education, 97(1), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21043
  10. Lithner, J. (2000). Mathematical reasoning in task solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(2), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003956417456
  11. Loewenberg Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
  12. Loong, E. Y.-K., Vale, C., Herbert, S., & Bragg, L. A. (2017). Tracking change in primary teachers’ understanding of mathematical reasoning through demonstration lessons. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 19(1), 5–19.
  13. Mueller, M., Yankelewitz, D., & Maher, C. (2014). Teachers Promoting Student Mathematical Reasoning. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 7(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/24727466.2014.11790339
  14. Stylianides, A. J., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Understanding and describing mathematical knowledge for teaching: Knowledge about proof for engaging students in the activity of proving. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(4), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9077-9
  15. Tall, D. (2014). Making Sense of Mathematical Reasoning and Proof. (2008), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7473-5_13
  16. Vale, C., Widjaja, W., Herbert, S., Bragg, L. A., & Loong, E. Y. K. (2017). Mapping Variation in Children’s Mathematical Reasoning: The Case of ‘What Else Belongs?’ International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(5), 873–894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9725-y